April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Zombie Douche) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it uses offensive language. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:50, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Douche is not an offensive name, however, if my name must be changed I will comply.Zombie Douche (talk) 18:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
- It couldn't be more obvious that this is not your first day on Wikipedia and you created this account with some sort of agenda in mind. I've got an idea, how about you just tell us right now what grand point you are endeavoring to make and save us the trouble of trying to figure it out through your odd remarks at RFA? Beeblebrox (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
I have just created this account but I have been reading wikipedia for days. Is not legal for a new editor to participate in RFA? I do not appreciate this bickering.
- It's perfectly "legal", but it is also a Redflag. A few days of reading Wikipedia is not normally enough time for a user to become aware of and feel comfortable participating in RFA discussions. You haven't actually edited any of the actual content of the encyclopedia yet you feel comfortable commenting on who is competent to be an administrator? Possible, but unlikely. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Well thus far, I haven't edited the encycolpedia and probably will just focus on recent changes, but I will mainly participate in RFAs. If you think that's shocking, then you'll really find it shocking that I know of the RFA reform. I know of the rules so it's not that I'm just voting without knowing anything.Zombie Douche (talk) 19:20, 13 April 2011 (UTC)