Content deleted Content added
removed; not looking to clutter my talkpage with pointless bickering |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:::: Since the edit I'd made to the [[Michael Jordan]] article was merely deleting the mention of his university affiliation it should have been <i>very</i> clear which discussion at [[Talk:Marion Jones]] was relevant. <font face="raphael" color="green">[[User:Duke53|Duke53]] | <sup>[[User talk:Duke53|Talk]]</sup></font> 04:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC) |
:::: Since the edit I'd made to the [[Michael Jordan]] article was merely deleting the mention of his university affiliation it should have been <i>very</i> clear which discussion at [[Talk:Marion Jones]] was relevant. <font face="raphael" color="green">[[User:Duke53|Duke53]] | <sup>[[User talk:Duke53|Talk]]</sup></font> 04:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::::An entire paragraph was moved in the wiki edit and multiple sentences were highlighted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Jordan&diff=163462607&oldid=163344603 diff] in red. The page is monitored aggressively for vandals and lead changes. Edit summaries are not only for listing reasons for changes, but also to ''describe the changes made.'' [[User:Zodiiak|Zodiiak]] 02:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
:::::An entire paragraph was moved in the wiki edit and multiple sentences were highlighted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Jordan&diff=163462607&oldid=163344603 diff] in red. The page is monitored aggressively for vandals and lead changes. Edit summaries are not only for listing reasons for changes, but also to ''describe the changes made.'' [[User:Zodiiak|Zodiiak]] 02:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
Yeah, leave your phony allegations though. :>) <font face="raphael" color="green">[[User:Duke53|Duke53]] | <sup>[[User talk:Duke53|Talk]]</sup></font> 04:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Hakim Warrick]] == |
== [[Hakim Warrick]] == |
Revision as of 04:53, 11 October 2007
Edit to Michael Jordan article
Are you saying that once an article achieves FA status that it can't be improved by further edits? Duke53 | Talk 02:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Not at all. I wasn't clear on what exactly you were referring to when stating, see Marion Jones' talk page. Your edit summary was a bit ambiguous. If you are looking to change the entire opening, it would be best to discuss first. Zodiiak 03:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- "See Marion Jones talk page; apparently this is the accepted format." The talk page has 5 subsections with various matters and discussions on it; the edit was unclear that you were referring directly to the inclusion of the University. Personally, I do not see a reason why you were not allowed to include Marion Jone's college affiliation in the lead. However, MJ's case is much stronger since it is countlessly mentioned throughout his career; from the origins of his "clutch" capabilities to his establishment of players in his new organizations (traded for stackhouse [UNC alum]), etc. Zodiiak 04:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Since the edit I'd made to the Michael Jordan article was merely deleting the mention of his university affiliation it should have been very clear which discussion at Talk:Marion Jones was relevant. Duke53 | Talk 04:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- An entire paragraph was moved in the wiki edit and multiple sentences were highlighted diff in red. The page is monitored aggressively for vandals and lead changes. Edit summaries are not only for listing reasons for changes, but also to describe the changes made. Zodiiak 02:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Since the edit I'd made to the Michael Jordan article was merely deleting the mention of his university affiliation it should have been very clear which discussion at Talk:Marion Jones was relevant. Duke53 | Talk 04:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, leave your phony allegations though. :>) Duke53 | Talk 04:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm about to get a picture of Hak on Wikipedia and then I'm going to submit it for review for Good Article status. Any other suggestions before I do so? Thanks again. Chengwes 15:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'll give it a read tomorrow and let you know -- Thanks! Zodiiak 02:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)