Content deleted Content added
Generalrelative (talk | contribs) →Also: new section Tags: Reverted New topic |
Zilch-nada (talk | contribs) Removed baseless claims; take issues with my edits up on talk pages - I am not here to right "great" wrongs, only to right wrongs I see in some articles. Tags: Blanking Manual revert |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Edit warring at [[The Heritage Foundation]] == |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Heritage_Foundation&diff=1177521467&oldid=1176950200 This] is one more example of edit warring. I see that you've been warned about this before so I won't hit you with the standard template, but I will encourage you to self-revert since there is clearly a [[Talk:The_Heritage_Foundation#Activist?|discussion on the talk page]] which you have failed to contribute to. Believe it or not, the other editors in this community are reasonable people who are persuaded by sources. You just have to take the time to unpack what the sources say in a civil way in order to persuade others. If you cannot collaborate like that you will eventually be subject to sanctions which may culminate in the loss of editing privileges altogether. Thanks, [[User:Generalrelative|Generalrelative]] ([[User talk:Generalrelative|talk]]) 23:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Also == |
|||
I took a look at your recent contribution history and reverted several of your most recent edits. This is not because I want to [[WP:HOUND|hound you]], i.e. to make your experience as an editor unpleasant, but rather because I think they display a clear pattern of POV-pushing which most third-party observers would agree is inappropriate. Please be careful not to present the appearance that you are here to [[WP:RGW|right great wrongs]]. We are all expected to adhere to Wikipedia's understanding of [[WP:NPOV|neutrality]], not our own personal one. Thanks, [[User:Generalrelative|Generalrelative]] ([[User talk:Generalrelative|talk]]) 23:53, 27 September 2023 (UTC) |