Undid revision 1103530948 by Zenzyyx (talk) Let people see the false warning until the issue has been resolved in the talk page of the article Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
→ATTENTION: question |
||
Line 7:
I DELETE TOPICS ON MY TALK PAGE ONCE THE CONVERSATION HAS BECOME DORMANT IN ORDER TO AVOID CLOGGING IT. [[User:Zenzyyx|zenzyyx_]] ([[User talk:Zenzyyx#top|talk]]) 12:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
:Why not use the archiving facility? [[User:Deb|Deb]] ([[User talk:Deb|talk]]) 08:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
== Eastern Anatolia Region ==
|
Revision as of 08:16, 10 August 2022
Quotes
You have some great quotes on your page! Thanks for sharing, Zen. - JGabbard (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
@JGabbard Hey J, apologies for the late reply! Thank you! All quotes I have on my page hold some kind of weight & meaning in my life. It's good to see other's relating to it too. zenzyyx_ (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
ATTENTION
I DELETE TOPICS ON MY TALK PAGE ONCE THE CONVERSATION HAS BECOME DORMANT IN ORDER TO AVOID CLOGGING IT. zenzyyx_ (talk) 12:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Eastern Anatolia Region
I'm not sure if this is a competance issue of yours or something else, but at this point of your account age, you should be aware that we don't use short essay edit summaries as means of communication like you did here [1], [2], especially for controversial edits, and especially when your arguments are subpar at best for justifying removal of an entire sourced section. There are talk pages for these kinds of things, you should discuss on the article talk page and raise your concerns, like I'm doing now discussing you on your talk page, and you could've noticed at least per article history that your edits would most likely face opposition. You've removed entire chunks of information with subpar at best rationale, and here's why;
This section is being removed because it is inconsistent with how all other articles on the Geographical regions of Turkey are structured. This issue has been raised in the talk page a few times, and is a legitimate one. These articles are not about the history of said regions, but current information (as evidenced by the remaining 6 articles relating to the geographical regions of Turkey
Not all articles are structured the same way, I'm not sure if this is a surprise for you or not, see WP:OTHERCONTENT which your arguments is at core. Especially when there is sourced information about the history of Eastern Anatolia Region that merits inclusion, it's a history section of its own. Why exactly, based on what valid rationale, this shouldn't be included in the article? I'm dumbfounded with your edit summary mini essay "argument" and lack of talk discussion for blanking an entire section.
Refer to previous edit summary + the Armenian translation included in the article translates to "Western Armenia", not "Eastern Anatolia Region". Again this is inconsistent with how all other articles on the Geographical regions of Turkey are structured.
That's not a translation, it's the separate and original name, see Western Armenia or Armenian highlands, it's even cited in the sources you removed if you actually bothered to read before removing an entire section. It predates Eastern Anatolia (see First Geography Congress, Turkey) by many years. And the second part of your argument is the same whataboutism which I addressed above. Your third edit is another WP:OTHERCONTENT whataboutism and lacks a valid rationale for removing well sourced content, like the other two.
You should consider stopping POV removal of an entire section and perhaps start discussing for especially controversial edits, just a thought. You may get sanctioned if you continue this type of POV editing pattern. I'm going to restore the valid and relevant information. If you have any disagreements, we can discuss here or on the article talk page. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 23:36, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Eastern Anatolia Region, you may be blocked from editing. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 23:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)