'''Being involved in an edit war can result in being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]], if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#Other revert rules|one-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than one [[Help:Reverting|revert]] on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the one-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-1rr --> ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 16:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]], if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#Other revert rules|one-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than one [[Help:Reverting|revert]] on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the one-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-1rr --> ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 16:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
==Disambiguation link notification for June 9==
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Juliana of Nicomedia]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Campana]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Juliana_of_Nicomedia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Juliana_of_Nicomedia?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
You have some great quotes on your page! Thanks for sharing, Zen. - JGabbard (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JGabbard Hey J, apologies for the late reply! Thank you! All quotes I have on my page hold some kind of weight & meaning in my life. It's good to see other's relating to it too. zenzyyx_ (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Don't remove tags unless you reach a consensus/solution
@Mann Mann hello. the tags were removed due to no further elaboration on the talk page. but now that the talk page has been moved, the tags will be kept up. thanks. zenzyyx_ (talk) 18:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atatürk's Main Principles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello, Zenzyyx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CanKan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Discretionary sanctions notice
Hi Zenzyyx. Please see the standard notice below about heightened conduct standards in a sensitive topic area. I know we're in the midst of a content dispute and these templates can appear hostile. I want to emphasize the "does not imply that there are any issues" part.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Your recent editing history at Armenian genocide shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in being blocked from editing—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (t · c) buidhe 16:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for June 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juliana of Nicomedia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campana.