Firefangledfeathers (talk | contribs) →Discretionary sanctions notice: new section |
Tags: Reverted Reply |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] ([[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Firefangledfeathers|contribs]]) 16:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC) |
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] ([[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Firefangledfeathers|contribs]]) 16:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC) |
||
:{{uw-1rr|Armenian genocide}} ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 16:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:43, 3 June 2022
Quotes
You have some great quotes on your page! Thanks for sharing, Zen. - JGabbard (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
@JGabbard Hey J, apologies for the late reply! Thank you! All quotes I have on my page hold some kind of weight & meaning in my life. It's good to see other's relating to it too. zenzyyx_ (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Don't remove tags unless you reach a consensus/solution
Hi. Why did you remove tags from Turkic history when there is a discussion about those issues on the talk page (see Talk:Turkic_history#Problematic article)? I guess it was an mistake because of this incomplete move, right? The editor seems to forgot moving the original talk page Talk:Turkic History. Mann Mann (talk) 01:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Mann Mann hello. the tags were removed due to no further elaboration on the talk page. but now that the talk page has been moved, the tags will be kept up. thanks. zenzyyx_ (talk) 18:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Atatürk's Main Principles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article is redundant with the article on Kemalism and the Six Arrows. Any unique information here can be merged into those articles
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Benlittlewiki (talk) 02:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Atatürk's Main Principles for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atatürk's Main Principles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:28, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:CanKan
Hello, Zenzyyx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CanKan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notice
Hi Zenzyyx. Please see the standard notice below about heightened conduct standards in a sensitive topic area. I know we're in the midst of a content dispute and these templates can appear hostile. I want to emphasize the "does not imply that there are any issues" part.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Your recent editing history at Armenian genocide shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in being blocked from editing—especially as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (t · c) buidhe 16:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)