MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 24h) to User talk:Yopie/Archives. |
Sherlock4000 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
My Regards, |
My Regards, |
||
[[User:Sherlock4000|Sherlock4000]] ([[User talk:Sherlock4000|talk]]) 23:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
[[User:Sherlock4000|Sherlock4000]] ([[User talk:Sherlock4000|talk]]) 23:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Repeated addition of unsubstantiated, anonymous claims == |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent editing history at [[:YPF]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[WP:BLOCK|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[WP:REVERT|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. |
|||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[WP:TALK|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Sherlock4000|Sherlock4000]] ([[User talk:Sherlock4000|talk]]) 22:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:11, 3 May 2012
User talk:89.100.150.198 reported
29 User talk:89.100.150.198 reported by User:Unokodak (Result: blocked one week) Best regards Unokodak (talk) 22:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
I dislike to say it, but thanks. You forced me to see things that indeed could be improved. The article's first section is now more focused on the subject.
— Breadbasket 05:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Dictators
At least give me an explanation of how I cannot place Josip Broz-Tito and Slobodan Milosevic additionally as dictators? Explain. 68.202.26.86 (talk) 05:18, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Moravian
Dear Yopie, is attached to this version, as this is objective and neutral edition. The question is not a stupid chauvinistic theory (for ex. the Wendish question or Međimurian question), and i objective linguists in this question. I think now it's a outcry, that the census in 2011 showed half million Moravians. For ex. Iaroslav was not objective and researched between my private things from the internet, but this is outrageous. Doncsecztalk 17:26, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
POV at YPF
Hi, Yopie:
I appreciate your interest in YPF.
Please realize that this user, BobRayner, has been insistingly adding op ed pieces as "sources" for his own opinions on the recent events at the firm. This violates NPOV, V, RS. There are a number of quotes from Spanish and Argentine officials directly concerned with the issue, and these are, of course, cited.
What Mr.Rayner has been inserting into the article are opinions and innuendo written in hostile editorials and as such were blatant POV; they were published in the Economist as opinion pieces and have no place in this article or any other.
I have informed Mr. Rayner of these concerns, and from a few of his past edits, I know he knows better. These include attempting to quote "Conservapedia" when his source did not mention the site at all and numerous instances in which he deleted sourced material because it quoted a mere opinion. I also shared my concerns with these edits on the talk page.
Let me know if you have any questions.
My Regards, Sherlock4000 (talk) 23:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Repeated addition of unsubstantiated, anonymous claims
Your recent editing history at YPF shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sherlock4000 (talk) 22:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)