Sherlock4000 (talk | contribs) →POV at YPF: new section |
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 24h) to User talk:Yopie/Archives. |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yopie/Archives | Archive page] |
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yopie/Archives | Archive page] |
||
== Komenský == |
|||
I am curious removing note Komenský was "Czech" teacher is reported as vandalism. |
|||
In my opinion, it is misleading to refer Komenský as “Czech” teacher. He was born and part of his life spent in The Margrave of Moravia ( a member state of The Czech Kingdom, part of The Holy Roman Empire). As is correctly noted in the same wiki article, he described himself as "Moravus ego natione, lingua Bohemus". Yes, he recognize his primary language as a czech language (but wrote mainly in latin). But language is not determinative for nationality. Moreover, nationality was not clearly defined in seventeen century and its definition is not unequivocal even in this days. |
|||
During all his life he recognize himself as a Moravian and Moravia as his homeland. This fact he explicitly demonstrates several times in his writings. Based on this facts, I guess referring Komenský as "Czech" teacher is misleading and should be deleted as not neutral. 90.178.30.242 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.178.30.242|90.178.30.242]] ([[User talk:90.178.30.242|talk]]) 20:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:Dear anonymous, please use [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Amos_Comenius|talk page of the article], where is my reply.--[[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie#top|talk]]) 15:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Danish Crown Regalia == |
|||
Don't revert if you don't know [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Danish_Crown_Regalia&diff=473694905&oldid=473687180 what you're reverting]. The link is not okay (it points to a guide about cultural places in Copenhagen, because the site has undergone a radical change sice the link was established), as it no longer points to a description about the lions guarding King Solomons throne. And if you look carefully at my edit, you'll see I added a Wiki link to an article about King Solomon and the 12 lions guarding it, which itself has references to biblical sources, which is a whole lot bettter! Thanks. [[User:Meewam|Meewam]] ([[User talk:Meewam|talk]]) 21:58, 28 January 2012 (UTC) |
|||
: Sorry for it, with this explaining is this OK, I misunderstood your summary "dead link".--[[User:Yopie|Yopie]] ([[User talk:Yopie#top|talk]]) 21:16, 31 January 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:: No - not exactly a good edit summery, I agree. Sorry for that. [[User:Meewam|Meewam]] ([[User talk:Meewam|talk]]) 06:37, 1 February 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== User talk:89.100.150.198 reported == |
== User talk:89.100.150.198 reported == |
Revision as of 20:53, 3 May 2012
User talk:89.100.150.198 reported
29 User talk:89.100.150.198 reported by User:Unokodak (Result: blocked one week) Best regards Unokodak (talk) 22:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
I dislike to say it, but thanks. You forced me to see things that indeed could be improved. The article's first section is now more focused on the subject.
— Breadbasket 05:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Dictators
At least give me an explanation of how I cannot place Josip Broz-Tito and Slobodan Milosevic additionally as dictators? Explain. 68.202.26.86 (talk) 05:18, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Moravian
Dear Yopie, is attached to this version, as this is objective and neutral edition. The question is not a stupid chauvinistic theory (for ex. the Wendish question or Međimurian question), and i objective linguists in this question. I think now it's a outcry, that the census in 2011 showed half million Moravians. For ex. Iaroslav was not objective and researched between my private things from the internet, but this is outrageous. Doncsecztalk 17:26, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
POV at YPF
Hi, Yopie:
I appreciate your interest in YPF.
Please realize that this user, BobRayner, has been insistingly adding op ed pieces as "sources" for his own opinions on the recent events at the firm. This violates NPOV, V, RS. There are a number of quotes from Spanish and Argentine officials directly concerned with the issue, and these are, of course, cited.
What Mr.Rayner has been inserting into the article are opinions and innuendo written in hostile editorials and as such were blatant POV; they were published in the Economist as opinion pieces and have no place in this article or any other.
I have informed Mr. Rayner of these concerns, and from a few of his past edits, I know he knows better. These include attempting to quote "Conservapedia" when his source did not mention the site at all and numerous instances in which he deleted sourced material because it quoted a mere opinion. I also shared my concerns with these edits on the talk page.
Let me know if you have any questions.
My Regards, Sherlock4000 (talk) 23:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)