MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 12h) to User talk:Xeno/Archive 22. |
→MK5384: new section |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Thanks :). -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 17:34, 17 May 2010 (UTC) |
Thanks :). -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] <[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]> 17:34, 17 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
:No problem =) –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 17:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC) |
:No problem =) –[[user:xeno|<font face="verdana" color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[user talk:xeno|<font color="black"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 17:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
== MK5384 == |
|||
Hello, Xeno. I'm glad everything worked out amicably. I would just like to mention a couple of things. First, I have amassed quite an extensive block log, which others have been quick to use against me. The truth of the matter is, that the 2 block extensions that followed the first were found to be unjust, and reversed. The next block came when I made a single edit to the Pershing article after it was unprotected. This came after I had made numerous promises that I would not edit war, and also discussed the proposed edit at length with the protecting admin (you). The block was reversed almost immediately. Then, in the process of unblocking me, the blocking admin accidentally re-blocked me. So, out of 7 incedents, we have 2 that are genuine. Is there any way of expunging, or at least providing an explanation in the log, of these other blocks? Secondly, I really take issue with what OberRanks said at ANI about me. I do not "frequently pick up on a topic, and make endless edits in an effort to get my version approved". He stated that I started, and restarted, ect. the Pershing debate, when, in fact, I wasn't even involved when OR began that debate with a number of other users. He claimed that I think that I am never wrong, ect., when examples of my admitting error and apologising can be found in many places. And the fact (which he knows) is, that, a number of users sided with me during the whole Pershing debate. I am not opining that he shouldn't be permitted to post his thoughts about me. But he said a number of things about me that were outright lies, and it isn't the first time he's done it. Can something at least be said to him to get him to stop with all of this?[[User:Mk5384|Mk5384]] ([[User talk:Mk5384|talk]]) 20:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:17, 17 May 2010
userpage | talk | dashboard | misc |
|
|
|
Where's Tsbdy?
I don't remember why I had Tsbdy's page on my watchlist, but I'm curious as to what happened to him. I remember his user page. Baby girl. Very cute. Did she leave, too? Thanks.Malke2010 00:38, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- He's sailed off into the great blue yonder. –xenotalk 02:15, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Complicated question
You know Infoboxes? Well, I am a member of another wiki and the infobox template would come in handy. However, the code for it is very complicated to me, so many internal templates and such that do not exist on this other wiki. I want to translate it so it can be used on this site, how can I do this without any other templates or stuff en.wikipedia? If it require as ton of effort than I'll just drop the idea completely.--Ezekiel 7:19 †Go Sharks! (sign)† 15:26, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well you can look at the bottom of the page in the edit window to Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page: that will show you its dependencies. You could either subst the ones you don't want to also import, or import them as well. I think it's easier to do the latter. –xenotalk 15:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Define 'anchor', please.
I've never seen that term used before. HalfShadow 16:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- See [1]. It means to add the {{anchor}} template so the old section links (in watchlists, page history, etc.) don't break. –xenotalk 16:25, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the pp-notice
Thanks :). -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 17:34, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
MK5384
Hello, Xeno. I'm glad everything worked out amicably. I would just like to mention a couple of things. First, I have amassed quite an extensive block log, which others have been quick to use against me. The truth of the matter is, that the 2 block extensions that followed the first were found to be unjust, and reversed. The next block came when I made a single edit to the Pershing article after it was unprotected. This came after I had made numerous promises that I would not edit war, and also discussed the proposed edit at length with the protecting admin (you). The block was reversed almost immediately. Then, in the process of unblocking me, the blocking admin accidentally re-blocked me. So, out of 7 incedents, we have 2 that are genuine. Is there any way of expunging, or at least providing an explanation in the log, of these other blocks? Secondly, I really take issue with what OberRanks said at ANI about me. I do not "frequently pick up on a topic, and make endless edits in an effort to get my version approved". He stated that I started, and restarted, ect. the Pershing debate, when, in fact, I wasn't even involved when OR began that debate with a number of other users. He claimed that I think that I am never wrong, ect., when examples of my admitting error and apologising can be found in many places. And the fact (which he knows) is, that, a number of users sided with me during the whole Pershing debate. I am not opining that he shouldn't be permitted to post his thoughts about me. But he said a number of things about me that were outright lies, and it isn't the first time he's done it. Can something at least be said to him to get him to stop with all of this?Mk5384 (talk) 20:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)