rm nonsense with offensive signature |
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) →Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Prill: new section |
||
Line 365: | Line 365: | ||
An article you deleted as a [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint George International|result of an AfD]] is back. --[[User:HighKing|HighKing]] ([[User talk:HighKing|talk]]) 10:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC) |
An article you deleted as a [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint George International|result of an AfD]] is back. --[[User:HighKing|HighKing]] ([[User talk:HighKing|talk]]) 10:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Redeleted per [[WP:CSD#G4|G4]]. <small>([[User:X!|<span style="color:gray">X!</span>]] · [[User talk:X!|<span style="color:gray">talk</span>]]) · [[Swatch Internet Time|@742]] · </small> 16:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC) |
:Redeleted per [[WP:CSD#G4|G4]]. <small>([[User:X!|<span style="color:gray">X!</span>]] · [[User talk:X!|<span style="color:gray">talk</span>]]) · [[Swatch Internet Time|@742]] · </small> 16:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Prill]] == |
|||
In your closing statement you said ''It's obvious that the people who said '''delete''' are either sockpuppets or meatpuppets''. Shouldn't that read "keep"? --[[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 02:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:38, 31 July 2009
- Features
- Create bot that reports TFA, POTD, and other stats to talk pages
- Modify adminstats bots (enwiki and simplewiki alike) to have a special param for non-admins
- Bugfixes
- Get AFD table working.
Votecount for an RFA isn't working
It appears the rfatally for Jerem43 isn't working. Any idea why? tedder (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to remove the template and manually enter the final tally. Tan | 39 14:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orion 17
I see a clear consensus to not keep the article in its present form, with people divided whether a redirect should exist. Could you re-examine your close? Thank you, Kusma (talk) 04:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- I've been looking over this AfD again and again, and have also discussed this privately with other administrators. All of us agree that either a no consensus closure or a redirect would have been appropriate. Because of this, I've decided to leave the AfD alone, but I would not object to you redirecting the article. (X! · talk) · @830 · 18:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Er, you didn't leave the AfD alone, you closed it. I don't really care about the article, but was hoping for a closure that gives some guidance about what to do with all the other related articles. From the way the debate went over time, there seemed to be less and less support for keeping. In particular, there was an obvious consensus to delete or redirect among the participants after the relist (when the true debate took place). I haven't closed AFDs in a while, but I really don't understand how you can arrive at a "no consensus" in this one. Kusma (talk) 06:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
How does 1 delete, and 6 merge/redirects since it was relisted become no consensus? Surely a redirect is in order, especially once one reads the discussion? Nfitz (talk) 07:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Please assume good faith, as I was closing it in what I thought was the most fair way. I've since reconsidered, after talking with Kusma above. (X! · talk) · @897 · 20:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Automated report of SoxBots
Here is a report of the status of all SoxBots as listed on User:X!/Sox Commons:
WikiCup Newsletter XXVI
The WikiCup Newsletter |
---|
Delivered for the WikiCup by ROBOTIC GARDEN at 15:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.
Section Title
KEVIN KEEN WENT TO JOHN HAMPDEN IN WYCOMBE ININT MANDEM —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.219.51.42 (talk) 16:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
- Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
- Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
- Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
- News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
- Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 15:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Soxred93's Tools
Hi, and thanks for all the great tools. Please link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:X!/Sox_Commons on your page Soxred93's Tools. Thanks. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind a little post AfD clean up
You decided the end of the Articles for deletion/List of film series with two entries AfD, but left the talk page message on the wrong talk page. The article was moved after the AfD had been started. I hope you don't mind that I moved the talk page message to the correct talk page and removed the AfD message from the article.
PS. How did you get the custom talk page edit header? LA @ 03:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- User talk:X!/Editnotice –Juliancolton | Talk 03:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- What Julian said.
:)
Yeah, I don't mind at all that you corrected me. I would have gladly done it, but I'm perfectly fine with you doing it. (X! · talk) · @210 · 04:02, 30 July 2009 (UTC) - Thanks Julian. And thank you X! for not minding about the clean-up. I wouldn't have known about your replies however, if I hadn't been bored and checked my contributions. There is a nice little template that you can use to let people know these things. :) LA If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:07, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Heehee, I don't really read signatures as much. I only just read the names. It might help if you let people know that you want a talkback message in the main body of your post, so it doesn't get lost in the "signature blindness". And besides, using the talkback isn't part of my general nature. I only use it if I see that someone specifically requests it. (see #4 of my pretty editnotice you asked about
:)
) But no big deal, just as long as you saw it. (X! · talk) · @300 · 06:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Heehee, I don't really read signatures as much. I only just read the names. It might help if you let people know that you want a talkback message in the main body of your post, so it doesn't get lost in the "signature blindness". And besides, using the talkback isn't part of my general nature. I only use it if I see that someone specifically requests it. (see #4 of my pretty editnotice you asked about
- What Julian said.
I wanted to take a moment to delivery a personal thank you (not "thank spam" :)) for your involvement in my RfA. It was truly an honor to be nominated by such well respected Wikipedian. I was familiar with your activities and have looked up to you for some time, but had no idea I was on your radar. I had been considering self-nominating for some time, but am glad I waited, as I much rather be nominated by someone like yourself than by me. :)
I will be sure to let you know if I encounter any problems that I need your help for - thank you for the offer.
Thanks again, ThaddeusB (talk) 04:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it was a pleasure to nominate you. It's not often that an editor gets over 100 supports in his RfA, and you are now one of them. I'm absolutely ecstatic that you've taken up the new tools excellently so far, and I wish you the best of luck in your future endeavors. And as Julian said, if you need any help, we're both here to help. (X! · talk) · @229 · 04:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
An article you deleted as a result of an AfD is back. --HighKing (talk) 10:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
In your closing statement you said It's obvious that the people who said delete are either sockpuppets or meatpuppets. Shouldn't that read "keep"? --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)