Lucia Black (talk | contribs) |
ChrisGualtieri (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 296: | Line 296: | ||
:: I've posted a little more at my talk page. Sorry to split it. [[User:ChrisGualtieri|ChrisGualtieri]] ([[User talk:ChrisGualtieri|talk]]) 13:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC) |
:: I've posted a little more at my talk page. Sorry to split it. [[User:ChrisGualtieri|ChrisGualtieri]] ([[User talk:ChrisGualtieri|talk]]) 13:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
For the past few months edit war between me, ryulong and chrisgualtieri about splitting content, even though no consensus was in his favor, he continued to disrupt. And eventually gave up. I'm no saint, but what I say is the truth. Not lies and not slander. I have User:knowledgekid also bringing him to ANI for personal attacks against me. Its 1 thing to admit wrong in the recent past, and attempt to say theyve changed, but thats not the case here.[[User:Lucia Black|Lucia Black]] ([[User talk:Lucia Black|talk]]) 16:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC) |
For the past few months edit war between me, ryulong and chrisgualtieri about splitting content, even though no consensus was in his favor, he continued to disrupt. And eventually gave up. I'm no saint, but what I say is the truth. Not lies and not slander. I have User:knowledgekid also bringing him to ANI for personal attacks against me. Its 1 thing to admit wrong in the recent past, and attempt to say theyve changed, but thats not the case here.[[User:Lucia Black|Lucia Black]] ([[User talk:Lucia Black|talk]]) 16:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
:: I've taken this to ANI. Sorry, Worldtraveler, but I used the diff of this in the posting. You are not a party to it, sorry to have accidentally dragged you into something like this. I wish I could have your thoughts on the matter, but I'd understand under the circumstances. These allegations are false and I can easily prove it. [[User:ChrisGualtieri|ChrisGualtieri]] ([[User talk:ChrisGualtieri|talk]]) 17:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:50, 24 May 2013
|
||||||
2013 (Q1) 2013 (Q2) 2013 (Q3) 2013 (Q4) |
If you stalk my talk page, please add your name to this list. Thanks.
World Traveller101 14:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() | Beware! This user is a known talk page stalker. |
![]() | Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers. |
|
My current time (United States-Boston) --- Please
to update![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What is my talk page not for
Hello people. My talk page is not for you stupid trolls or you lamebrain vandals Enjoy.
Welcome to my Talk Page
Hi guys. This is my talk page. If you have anything to discuss, please do. Thank you all. -Connor WorldTraveller101Did I mess up? 12:32, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
For Newer Wikipedians
These are very helpful:
- Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual
- Help:Contents
- Wikipedia:FAQ
- Wikipedia:Five pillars
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Template:Admin help
- Template:helpme
Thanks. World Traveller101 00:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Here's a plate full of cookies to share! | |
Hi WorldTraveller101/Last, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! AutomaticStrikeout ! C Sign AAPT 02:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC) |
Please STOP
Hi.. WorldTraveller101.. Stop your sloppy vandalism work!!! You recently undid several constructive contributions by IP 70.247.166.76 citing it as unsourced content. I am no worldtraveller, but it took me less then 30 secs for each page, to verify the information added by IP using the sourced provided in the article already. You can consider this as final or only warning as you have been previously notified several time by different editors about you undoing constructive edits of others. Next time you repeat this, you may be indefinitely blocked (as you have already been blocked 4 times) or if possible banned from so called anti-vandalism work. Plus you issued two consecutive level1 and level2 warning to 70.247.166.76, which is again a violation of WP policies. IP 70.247.166.76 did not do any "un sourced" editing after level1 warning, so a level2 warning is unfair. Similarly your behaviour in the edit summaries is also not proper. I demand that you apologise to this IP. I know that you did not apologise to 142.240.200.7. But this time you do.--Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:40, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:13, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hm. Alrighty then. I really don't have anything else to say. Um, I'll change things. World Traveller101 10:16, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- Decided to give him WikiLove. Hope he enjoys. However, [not that this excuses it], but without an edit summary stating the source (unless you re-add the link for the domestic top 10 route source, it rots pretty quickly), I just thought it was like that and that there was no evidence, but for me:...sigh and
Anyway, apologies. World Traveller101 10:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- While the edit summaries are helpful and recommended, those are not mandatory. In the preset case, the editor have basically updated the statistics of a given airline. It is entirely possibly that the new editor may not be aware fully of policies. In such cases and in general while reverting vandalism it is the responsibility of the reverting editor to check the facts. Maybe I will enjoy your cookies better if you suspend your so called anti-vandal work for coupe of months and focus on content creation. You spend great deal of amount doing the work precisely other then content creations. Spreading cookies and burgers, requesting protection for your userpages even without in vandalism, and updating edit counts of your user box etcs. I hope you put same kind of efforts in the actual aim of WP i.e. content creation. You know out of 2000+ edits which you show on your userbox about 500-600 are in your own user page, read WP:ITIS. If you really hope to actually make any decent contribution to WP, I suggest you find someone to adopt you, and focus only on content creation. It is for your own good. I do not know what else to advice you. It is another immaturity of yours that now you throw a barnstar on the anon IP editor with only about 10 edits. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 13:11, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- I would be interested in adopting WorldTraveller101. However, you guys would have to wait for me to set up my adoption program. AutomaticStrikeout ? 01:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh cool thanks. I've been invited to the teahouse[which I have poorly utilised] and I'm also getting CVUA training, but extra help can only help. Thanks. World Traveller101 11:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- If AS can't do it, Arctic Kangaroo would be great help or additional help. Thanks. World Traveller101 11:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I'd be glad to adopt you, but it may take me some time to get my adoption program set up. AutomaticStrikeout ? 15:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh cool. Thanks, AS. World Traveller101 15:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. I'll let you know when I'm ready for you to begin. AutomaticStrikeout ?
- Oh cool. Thanks, AS. World Traveller101 15:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I'd be glad to adopt you, but it may take me some time to get my adoption program set up. AutomaticStrikeout ? 15:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- If AS can't do it, Arctic Kangaroo would be great help or additional help. Thanks. World Traveller101 11:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh cool thanks. I've been invited to the teahouse[which I have poorly utilised] and I'm also getting CVUA training, but extra help can only help. Thanks. World Traveller101 11:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- I would be interested in adopting WorldTraveller101. However, you guys would have to wait for me to set up my adoption program. AutomaticStrikeout ? 01:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- While the edit summaries are helpful and recommended, those are not mandatory. In the preset case, the editor have basically updated the statistics of a given airline. It is entirely possibly that the new editor may not be aware fully of policies. In such cases and in general while reverting vandalism it is the responsibility of the reverting editor to check the facts. Maybe I will enjoy your cookies better if you suspend your so called anti-vandal work for coupe of months and focus on content creation. You spend great deal of amount doing the work precisely other then content creations. Spreading cookies and burgers, requesting protection for your userpages even without in vandalism, and updating edit counts of your user box etcs. I hope you put same kind of efforts in the actual aim of WP i.e. content creation. You know out of 2000+ edits which you show on your userbox about 500-600 are in your own user page, read WP:ITIS. If you really hope to actually make any decent contribution to WP, I suggest you find someone to adopt you, and focus only on content creation. It is for your own good. I do not know what else to advice you. It is another immaturity of yours that now you throw a barnstar on the anon IP editor with only about 10 edits. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 13:11, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Another note on this: you're continuing to use Twinkle to revert good faith edits without an edit summary (most recently here). Per WP:TWABUSE, that is forbidden. —Alex (ASHill | talk | contribs) 00:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Adoption page
I have created your main adoption page at User:AutomaticStrikeout/Adopt/WorldTraveller101. You can start whenever you are ready. The program actually is not completely finished, as I still have work to do on the 9th lesson. However, I don't think it will be a problem for you to start now. Regards, AutomaticStrikeout ? 20:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm just wondering if you've gotten started yet. AutomaticStrikeout ? 16:16, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've been busy, but yes I've started looking over. Thanks for asking. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 16:17, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. Don't feel rushed and let me know when you are ready for the first test. AutomaticStrikeout ? 16:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm ready. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 20:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Okie dokie. I posted the test. AutomaticStrikeout ? 02:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm ready. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 20:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. Don't feel rushed and let me know when you are ready for the first test. AutomaticStrikeout ? 16:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've been busy, but yes I've started looking over. Thanks for asking. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 16:17, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
I noticed your Wikibreak template just now and I'm wondering if this will affect your ability to continue with your adoption program? AutomaticStrikeout ? 02:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- No no no, not at all! I'll still be on almost every day. All it means is that I'm putting more time towards nl.wili. So, no. I'll still finish in a timely manner. Only full wikibreaks will affect it. Thanks for adking. Sincerely, WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 02:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, that's good to hear. AutomaticStrikeout ? 02:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- When will you be able to finish test 1? AutomaticStrikeout ? 23:29, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Is by the end of this week okay? I'm busy with school and track, so I can only do a little bit a night. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 23:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I suppose so. AutomaticStrikeout ? 23:38, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, I could have it done by the end of tomorrow
Gracias. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 01:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- That would be good. AutomaticStrikeout ? 01:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm done. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 01:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, I could have it done by the end of tomorrow
- You passed! I've graded your test and left some comments for you in the now-collapsed section. I have also posted lesson two, which you may begin at any time. AutomaticStrikeout ? 02:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cc/Kitten-stare.jpg/150px-Kitten-stare.jpg)
Thanks for the welcome!
JackFrost2121 (talk) 23:44, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, and welcome JackFrost 2121. Cheers. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 23:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Username Artwork
I noticed that whenever you sign your comments on talk pages, you signature shows color and excitement, while mine is simply blue link, how did you pimp out your name, did you use HTML or what, If I do customize mine ill probably add cool colors to go with my username. Cheers JackFrost2121 (talk) 12:35, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Go to preferences to change it. I frequently change my signature, but I'll send it to you ASAP, then change signature in Preferences, but link it so it goes to your user and talk page. Thanks. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 13:01, 18 May 2013 (UTC)- I'll send you a version of it to your talk page (I'll make it for you and you say whether or not you like it). The one thing is you may not have icons such as
or
in your signature. I'll have it for you in a second. Unfortunately, there is limited space for signature, just as an FYI. Thanks, Jack. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 13:13, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
You Are Awesome!
That's Awesome I never expected you to make one for me! you are awesome Thank you so much!, didn't expect Wikipedia to be so helpful JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 17:15, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- If you plan to edit constructively, cooperate with editors/come to consensus, and are always cool/never insult editor, even if they push you to the brim. I hope you enjoy and plan to stay, because clearly, you are going to be an excellent editor as far as I'm concerned
Cheers. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 01:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
New Articles Created
Hi There! I just created two articles
If you are free could you check them out, and tell me if they will last or get deleted soon, as I am unaware of their lasting. Thanks! JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 21:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- I checked out both. Find more references and expand to make sure that A) it indeed does not get tagged and b) it is good to improve the rating. You are currently at Stub Class, then it goes up to Start Class, C-class, B-class, A-class, Good Article, and finally, Featured Article. They are good for a start. They will always improve. Good luck. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 21:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Draft
Just wanted to let you know about your draft here: User:WorldTraveller101/Martin Richard. That page already exists as a redirect at Martin Richard to the main event due to WP:1E, so your article is unlikely to survive in the mainspace if you move it. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Re: WP:AIV commentary
Hello! Thanks for chiming in on WP:AIV regarding the report of User:76.102.142.132. I just wanted to let you know that the little templated decision tags are generally for use by administrators making a more or less official "call" on the actionability of the report. I quite agree with the call you made, but just for propriety and clarity's sake (though you did identify yourself as a non-admin), it might be best to avoid using those templates in future. No harm done, it just might be best to avoid. As far as I know there's no hard-and-fast policy on it, it's just a matter of typical procedure. - Vianello (Talk) 15:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh OK cool, no harm done. Thanks for the advice/notice. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 15:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Article Creation
I was just stalking your talkpage, to the point where there were no barnstars at all in your 9+ months of service. There has often been cases where an editors been raging on you for hounding, and reverting work done by an IP, so I was thinking if you want to work together in creating articles? I already see that you have already attempted to do this here; User:WorldTraveller101/Martin Richard, I can help you expand that one if you want, also there's a link here to my article creation page here: User:JackFrost2121/Articles, so if you want to work together on articles, please do tell me as I would be really happy if you do so. I have already created 4 articles over the last two days so don't worry about bad track records such as my articles being deleted because of A1, G6, G11 excetera.
- Hemisodorcus arrowi my newest one.
- Great northern tilefish probably my best one.
- Latouchia swinhoei needs more references to support it.
- Miomantinae maybe more refs.
- Rhynchocinetes uritai just created
Sincerely: JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 11:38, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Resilient Barnstar |
After being blocked, shouted at, and disputed by some editors, you started to work really hard, reverting vandalism, and everything, as far as I can see from your contributions all your work is great, but nobody recognized your effort... Until Now JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 12:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 02:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
STOP UNDOING MSP AIRPORT!
Why are you undoing an edit on Minneapolis St Paul International Airport? The original change you are referring to is valid. The line is now called the Metro Blue Line. Do your homework before you undo someones edit. Now you are hounding me about vandalism??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.81.190.25 (talk) 11:32, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- He didn't hound you, he simply gave you a level 1 warning on an edit war, do yourself a favor and search up what vandalism is. You are simply trolling. JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 11:38, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Did anyone notice that the IP's edits are actually correct? The Hiawatha Line has been renamed the Blue Line. Although slow edit-wars are not acceptable, neither is the mindless reversion of an actually correct addition, simply because "it's been reverted before" (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Actually the IP was right, but edit wars are unacceptable on both sides no matter if you are right or wrong, I'll go ahead and fix it. JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 13:07, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- A few things to remember:
- 1. IP 216.81.190.25, if you want to prove your correct (as other editors had previously reverted such info), either a) add an inline source or b) state where you got the info from, such as the link.
- 2. Also, that was not hounding at all. As [likely] all of us have learned before [including myself], making accusations like that is actually a violation of policy. Hounding and vandalism are serious accusations, as neither did I hound, nor did you make vandalism. However, you un-reverting is the base of an edit war. I've seen it all before.
- Thanks guys for the help. Sincerely, WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 23:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Before you start biting into the ip for edit warring, just remember you made just as many reverts as the ip and edit warred just as much also so don't act like you're superior. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Um...how is this biting? He was edit warring by reverting. I'm not at no fault here, but if the IP had just a) added the source or b) stated the link in the edit summary, then I never would've reverted. Also, I wasn't saying I was 'superior'. I would've stopped reverting and had gone back if someone hadn't have piped up that the information is actually correct. Thanks. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 00:36, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, re-review things WT101 - you're actually the edit-warrior in this situation ... there's also no need for another source when a simple click on the wikilink would have shown you that. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:BITE#Common_newcomer_errors and read the whole thing too. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Um...how is this biting? He was edit warring by reverting. I'm not at no fault here, but if the IP had just a) added the source or b) stated the link in the edit summary, then I never would've reverted. Also, I wasn't saying I was 'superior'. I would've stopped reverting and had gone back if someone hadn't have piped up that the information is actually correct. Thanks. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 00:36, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Before you start biting into the ip for edit warring, just remember you made just as many reverts as the ip and edit warred just as much also so don't act like you're superior. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- A few things to remember:
- Actually the IP was right, but edit wars are unacceptable on both sides no matter if you are right or wrong, I'll go ahead and fix it. JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 13:07, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Did anyone notice that the IP's edits are actually correct? The Hiawatha Line has been renamed the Blue Line. Although slow edit-wars are not acceptable, neither is the mindless reversion of an actually correct addition, simply because "it's been reverted before" (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- WT101, if I remember correctly, you've gotten yourself into some trouble in the past for vandalism-reverting issues. I believe you are acting in good faith, but I still think you should be very careful when undoing edits. I'd say you should restrict yourself to 1 revert in any situation and don't hesitate to ask me for help when you aren't sure what to do. AutomaticStrikeout ? 00:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, Bwilkins, I reverted before the page was moved, so while I could've looked it up, but a source would save a lot of time and unnecessary argument. Although after checking, the page was moved. Thanks guys and I hope we can all move on. Sincerely, WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 01:27, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- It was in the first sentence of that page. It doesn't need to be in the title. And a split second google search would have saved a lot of time and unnecessary argument. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 01:38, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, Bwilkins, I reverted before the page was moved, so while I could've looked it up, but a source would save a lot of time and unnecessary argument. Although after checking, the page was moved. Thanks guys and I hope we can all move on. Sincerely, WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 01:27, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- User:AutomaticStrikeout is correct, as WorldTraveller has made a few good faith mistakes here and there, what I suggest is that you take a break from vandalism reverts and start creating articles, and completing your courses first. You can assist my efforts in article creation, or I can help you with your current article(More Information is on the post above your barnstar). Cheers JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 01:43, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- WT101, I know it took you quite a while to learn the ropes to the extent you have here, including what is a valid source and what isn't. In fact, it took you long enough that you gave yourself a fresh start with your current account. Thus, have some empathy for new editors! This is a clear case of an anonymous and presumably inexperienced editor (216.81.190.25) seeing something that was no longer accurate and fixing it, exactly what we encourage editors to do. As you should remember, new editors don't know about referencing standards, so saying that the anonymous editor should have provided a source and implying that the lack of a source justifies your failure to check the facts is errant pedantry.
- Sources are important, but they're a tool to make Wikipedia accurate. When you see something plausible but unsourced from an anonymous editor like this in the future, I recommend that you make some effort (10 seconds is more than it would have taken in this case) to research the edit before reverting. My experience is that a majority (though certainly not all) of edits like this are actually factually correct, particularly when the edit summary you undid explains that this is a change in the name of the line. Remember that sources of basic facts are only needed if a fact is challenged. Citation needed tags are also helpful if you doubt the veracity of a claim. —Alex (ASHill | talk | contribs) 02:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- To be honest ASHill, this user shows great empathy for new users (Like Me), and respects them, nor is he too bitey, as I haven't noticed that on my side, but he can be rough around I.P editors, I told him to take a breather and stop doing anti-vandalism work until he has completed the courses given to him by AutomaticStrikeout, I also told him to start working on article creation, as it helped me learn on how to use Wikipedia. Cheers! JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 02:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Article creation might be a good place to improve and help you. JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 02:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Connor, it is indeed anonymous editors on which I keep encountering this issue; they're generally new too! I do appreciate your efforts and resulting improvement, which are certainly notable. However, once again, I echo the common refrain that you refrain from anti-vandalism work until you've got the hang of Wikipedia more. —Alex (ASHill | talk | contribs) 02:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Understood! Also I think it's time this argument comes to a close, I doubt WT101 will reply now because he lives in the eastern time zone area according to his clock on the top of his page. Cheers! JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 02:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks guys. This thread and all above will be archived soon. Thanks guys. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 11:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Understood! Also I think it's time this argument comes to a close, I doubt WT101 will reply now because he lives in the eastern time zone area according to his clock on the top of his page. Cheers! JackFrost2121(Frostbitten?/ My Work) 02:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Connor, it is indeed anonymous editors on which I keep encountering this issue; they're generally new too! I do appreciate your efforts and resulting improvement, which are certainly notable. However, once again, I echo the common refrain that you refrain from anti-vandalism work until you've got the hang of Wikipedia more. —Alex (ASHill | talk | contribs) 02:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
San Francisco International Airport
Hello WorldTraveller101, Could I just draw your attention to the recent edits made on the San Francisco International Airport? A editor who seems to specialise in reverting correct infomation is getting close to edit warring. Do you know of an Admin whoo specialises in airports/airlines who could take look at this? Regards, David J Johnson (talk) 23:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Clearly just a content dispute. Get consensus at talk before reverting. See WP:3RR. This states that no one can revert more than three times on a single article within a 24-hour period. Luckily for you, you are at 1, and User:Tim Zukas is at two. I gave him a warning for edit warring, as he was nearly blocked for a similar edit war at Newark Liberty International Airport.
I personally can't help much more than to warn him with harder words, since he had 'warred many times before. For you, this is basically your general reminder to not 'war. Don't revert again. If he is removing other things you dislike, bring it to the article's talk page to get some consensus. Thanks for notifying me, David. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 00:42, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help. My only concern was that the amount of edits should have gone for discussion on the Talk page first. I have to say that this user seems to think he always right without developing consensus and that is not how Wikipedia operates. Best regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 09:59, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- You seem to demonstrate understanding of the policies quite well. He has been in trouble (nearly blocked) for the same thing. The only reason he didn't get a block is because he didn't hit 3RR. Thanks for the notice. I'll keep an eye open. Sincerely, WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 21:12, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for all your help, which is much appreciated. I think I've been around Wikipedia for long enough to understand the policies and that is what prompted my intervention Kind regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 21:20, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sure you both know this already, but just for the benefit of anyone who doesn't, be aware that editors can be blocked for edit warring even if they did not breach 3RR (even on articles that don't have lower thresholds set by other means). --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:26, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
SyndromeOfADown
I'd note at the SPI that that account's been blocked (although, to be fair, it was the socking more than the username. I think it or one of JY's other socks that has a similar name was reported to UAA sometime back, and the consensus (such as it was) was that it was not offensive enough to block on sight (I've seen that on T-shirts), but that someone could and should gently persuade him to request a change. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Understood. However, this user is extremely persistent on his talk that he isn't. I get the sense that there is surely some chance of him not being a sock. However, his recent contribs were so similar, that it wasn't a bad idea to block just to be surr, but the real answer falls on Checkuser. I 'll request soon, but I'm on my iPod, so it's harder to edit in any view. Thanks. WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 02:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
against adminship
I personally am against the adminship of of ChrisGualtieri. He may be helpful in alot of articles and editors but most definitely not impartial and I fear will only abuse his administrative power. In the past (recent) he was quick to call editors troll, make personal attacks and claim others to attack him. Uses WP:NPA whenever it suits him not realizing WP:BOOMERANG hurts his accusations. This editor is NOT ready to be an admin yet.Lucia Black (talk) 08:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- You know what, WorldTraveler101, I do welcome your favor, but this editor is the reason why I think I have to reconsider. Lucia Black is only going to spout slander and lies. Here is the relevant discussion, from my talk page. The RFC concerning Lucia's planned deletion campaign (self assert by Lucia Black) is open at the pump. I think that has to be dealt with before proceeding. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 13:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've posted a little more at my talk page. Sorry to split it. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 13:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
For the past few months edit war between me, ryulong and chrisgualtieri about splitting content, even though no consensus was in his favor, he continued to disrupt. And eventually gave up. I'm no saint, but what I say is the truth. Not lies and not slander. I have User:knowledgekid also bringing him to ANI for personal attacks against me. Its 1 thing to admit wrong in the recent past, and attempt to say theyve changed, but thats not the case here.Lucia Black (talk) 16:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've taken this to ANI. Sorry, Worldtraveler, but I used the diff of this in the posting. You are not a party to it, sorry to have accidentally dragged you into something like this. I wish I could have your thoughts on the matter, but I'd understand under the circumstances. These allegations are false and I can easily prove it. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)