PeterTheFourth (talk | contribs) →FYI, Arbitration Enforcement: new section |
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:WookieInHeat/Archive 2) (bot |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{Talkback|Voceditenore}} |
{{Talkback|Voceditenore}} |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:WikiAlerter Roundel.png]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The file [[:File:WikiAlerter Roundel.png]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
<blockquote>Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[File talk:WikiAlerter Roundel.png|the file's talk page]]. |
|||
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion|files for discussion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Willy1018|Willy1018]] ([[User talk:Willy1018|talk]]) 05:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Alert == |
== Alert == |
||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
Revision as of 04:29, 14 May 2019
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Hello, let me note that the restriction at Template:Editnotices/Page//r/The_Donald regarding "You must not reinstate any challenged (via reversion) edits without obtaining consensus on the talk page of this article" means you shouldn't have made this revert. Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:58, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Please self-revert this edit per the above restriction - or else I'll have to file a report at WP:AE about these violations (of both WP:1RR and consensus-required) and you will probably be blocked. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:29, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
FYI, editing restrictions are in place for /r/The_Donald
Hello. Just so you know, there are some editing restrictions in place at /r/The Donald. I've included them below:
- You must not make more than one revert per 24 hours to this article.
- You must not reinstate any challenged (via reversion) edits without obtaining consensus on the talk page of this article
Of note is the second bullet point - you reinstated an edit I challenged without obtaining consensus on the talk page. Would you please revert that? If you'd like not to, I'd have to take it to arbitration enforcement to have this solved, which would likely result in sanctions against one of us. That's a route I'd rather not take - it would be easier if you could self revert and start a section on talk about your proposed removal. PeterTheFourth (talk) 08:41, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
FYI, Arbitration Enforcement
I've opened an arbitration enforcement request here regarding your edits to the /r/The Donald page. PeterTheFourth (talk) 12:18, 13 May 2019 (UTC)