Content deleted Content added
SebastianHelm (talk | contribs) Courtesy notice: Continuation of SLR agreement using AWB |
→User notice: temporary 3RR block: new section |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
== SLR agreement == |
== SLR agreement == |
||
As a signatory of this agreement, you may be interested that we're currently discussing the [[WT:SLR#Continuation of SLR agreement]]. This is just a courtesy notice. — [[User:SebastianHelm|Sebastian]] 05:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC) |
As a signatory of this agreement, you may be interested that we're currently discussing the [[WT:SLR#Continuation of SLR agreement]]. This is just a courtesy notice. — [[User:SebastianHelm|Sebastian]] 05:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
== User notice: temporary 3RR block == |
|||
<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> |
|||
==Regarding reversions[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bharatanatyam&action=history] made on [[January 24]] [[2008]] to [[Talk:Bharatanatyam]]== |
|||
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{time|}}}|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for violating the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|at [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Please be more careful to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] or seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] rather than engaging in an [[WP:EW|edit war]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{sig|}}}|<span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 07:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> The duration of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User:Wiki_Raja&action=edit§ion=new block] is 2 weeks. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 07:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)</div> |
|||
:The duration was set for 2 weeks because this is not the first time you have engaged in disruptive edit warring over the same project templates on user talk pages. If you recall, I issued a 72 hour block for the same type of editing back in September 2007. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] ([[User talk:Nishkid64|talk]])</span> 07:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:11, 24 January 2008
|
Impressive Work
I've been observing for quite sometime. You have been doing extremely impressive work in Wikipedia. Your userpage is highly informative. I'm extremely sorry for not joining your project. I personally dont feel the name 'Dravidian civilizations' or 'Dravidian people' is right. Instead something like 'Tamil civilization' could be used. Anyway, thankx. Bye. tc.-Ravichandar 03:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Actually Wikiproject Dravidian civilizations was chosen to promote Tamil, Telugu, Malayalee, and other similar groups. Thus, Dravidian civilizations is a family of related ethnicities and languages in South Asia. There is not much info on these groups as compared to the information covered on Indo-Aryan civilizations. There is a lot of work to be done, which is being done. Furthermore, Wikiproject Dravidian civilizations can be used as a platform to create other Wikiprojects focussing on a particular civilization such as that of the Tamils, or Telugus, or Brahuis, and so forth. Therefore, I will consider the idea for a Wikiproject Tamil civilization. Please let me know if you are interested. Regards. Wiki Raja (talk)
SLR agreement
As a signatory of this agreement, you may be interested that we're currently discussing the WT:SLR#Continuation of SLR agreement. This is just a courtesy notice. — Sebastian 05:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions[1] made on January 24 2008 to Talk:Bharatanatyam
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
The duration of the is 2 weeks. Nishkid64 (talk) 07:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)- The duration was set for 2 weeks because this is not the first time you have engaged in disruptive edit warring over the same project templates on user talk pages. If you recall, I issued a 72 hour block for the same type of editing back in September 2007. Nishkid64 (talk) 07:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)