ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Widefox/Archive 4. (BOT) |
|||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
:::[[User:Ɱ]] no evidence, no consensus, did you see [[WP:DWH]] ([[Wikipedia:Harassment]]) first as it rules it out? You tried to contact me offwiki - why? (your disclosure issues I'll reply to at COIN), note that disclosure is required everywhere including talk messages, which could even include this as the actual topic is your paid COI. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 15:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC) |
:::[[User:Ɱ]] no evidence, no consensus, did you see [[WP:DWH]] ([[Wikipedia:Harassment]]) first as it rules it out? You tried to contact me offwiki - why? (your disclosure issues I'll reply to at COIN), note that disclosure is required everywhere including talk messages, which could even include this as the actual topic is your paid COI. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 15:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
:Jumping on this again {{u|Widefox}}. As an independent (but now verging on involved) editor, I would recommend removing and ignoring this warning as it is unfounded <abbr title="Smiling face" style="border-bottom: none;">[[File:Face-smile.svg|18px|link=]]</abbr> [[User:samtar|samtar]] <sup>[[User talk:Samtar|{<font color="DarkGrey">t</font>}]]</sup> 17:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC) |
:Jumping on this again {{u|Widefox}}. As an independent (but now verging on involved) editor, I would recommend removing and ignoring this warning as it is unfounded <abbr title="Smiling face" style="border-bottom: none;">[[File:Face-smile.svg|18px|link=]]</abbr> [[User:samtar|samtar]] <sup>[[User talk:Samtar|{<font color="DarkGrey">t</font>}]]</sup> 17:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
::{{re|samtar}} How is this unfounded? Have you read WP:HOUNDING and read what Widefox put on my talk page? If not, then maybe you could think it unfounded. If you have read those and didn't get that conclusion, then Widefox should ignore your advice, as the majority should clearly see how accusing Widefox was with multiple conflicts related to me. Widefox, how is 'attempted off-wiki communication' not allowed? Wikipedia allows editors to email other editors freely for a reason. Better communication helps solve issues. I could Skype you if that's help. There's no rule that says COI editors can't off-wiki talk to 100% volunteer editors. Besides, that's ridiculous.--[[User:Ɱ|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">'''ɱ'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ɱ|(talk]] · [[User:Ɱ/Briarcliff Manor|vbm]] · [[User:Ɱ/COI|coi)]] 06:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== ''The Signpost'': 04 November 2015 == |
== ''The Signpost'': 04 November 2015 == |
Revision as of 06:03, 12 November 2015
A page, about me, and edits on the English Wikipedia. Talk to me...
- If I reverted, or undid your edit, please see User:Widefox/Why I revert vandalism.
- If your edit was to a disambiguation page, first see Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts.
Virginia Tech Articles Created
I noticed you flagged a number of the articles that I recently created, and questioned if I have a COI. I can assure you that I do not, and respectfully request your assistance in improving these articles to meet Wikipedia's standards. Huskers110110 (talk) 01:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- (reply is on your page - i.e. draft first to avoid deletion). Widefox; talk 01:25, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Please stop the Wikipedia:Bullying. I have already put in a complaint to the Administrator and stop contacting me.Huskers110110 (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- You asked at Help [1] and several places [2] [3] [4] [5]. I was happy to let others discuss with you, but help suggested dialog with me, so it appears not the answer you wanted from them. As there's nothing personal, but these are promo articles it's a bit WP:BOOMERANG for you I'm afraid. Widefox; talk 12:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Please stop the Wikipedia:Bullying. I have already put in a complaint to the Administrator and stop contacting me.Huskers110110 (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- If you would like to do similar work with other universities, there's a wide opportunity. More than 10% of the more extensively covered universities are done as poorly, and at least 50% not much better DGG ( talk ) 19:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know if I should feel flattered you ask DGG, or run in horror. The irony is I was just trying something new inspired by the 5M articles - checking a couple of new ones. Eye-opener! I'm actually shocked by the state of these new articles, and more so to hear so many uni articles are similarly promo per other's comments. Widefox; talk 02:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
deprod
I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Charis Katakis, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! 2602:30A:2EFE:F050:6C6F:3B3D:9F18:9068 (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Great, I see you deprodded several articles but didn't improve or comment why. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charis Katakis. Widefox; talk 22:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Jambo!
Hello,
You tagged the new article Jambo! with the same maintenance tag at the header and within a section after you took out the contents. Yes, I understand the contents were mostly on the disambig page for Jambo. And I have since updated a few you removed from Jambo! but failed to add to the disambig page. I put back one example, adding more than I wanted clarification, with two cites. I now assume that the section has cites, the issues of citation is no longer valid. I have removed the tags. Please review and if there is any addition or correction you see, please be specific where the corrections need to be done.
Thank you. Jrcrin001 (talk) 22:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm editing the dab right now. I will comment on the article on its talk page. Widefox; talk 22:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
deprod 2
I have removed the {{prod}} tag from James Dybas, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! 2602:30A:2EFE:F050:884:A54E:F6D5:C2AF (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TCP Fast Open, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
WP:PROD change
I was thinking of WP:BOLDly making that option A change, or would you like to do it? It might need an RFC but why not try and see if it sticks... Vrac (talk) 15:25, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Bold would normally be good, but many have objected to changing PROD on principle so I'll ping some first, then see. Widefox; talk 15:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Jarret Myer
Hi Widefox. Earlier this year, you added two flags to the Jarret Myer article noting poor sourcing and neutrality. I'm reaching out because I'd like to correct those issues. I'm working on behalf of Jarret Myer and Uproxx, the company Myer founded, to help improve the article. Unlike connected contributors of the past, I will not be editing the article directly. I left notes on the Talk page explaining my COI and also what I think can be done to fix some of the problems in the entry. If you have time, would you be willing to review those and let me know what you think? Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. (unsigned by User:Ɱ).
- Harass level 3 is a bold template. No 1, or 2 have been given. Care to tell me what about? Just to clarify timings, I am just about to post a question about your COI disclosure at WP:COIN. This is independent. Widefox; talk 19:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- So, a day later and no evidence of this has been presented, and at WP:COIN the consensus of other editors are in agreement with me. Either withdraw, or provide evidence! This currently empty accusation is supported by nobody else, see WP:BOOMERANG. Widefox; talk 12:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- User:Ɱ no evidence, no consensus, did you see WP:DWH (Wikipedia:Harassment) first as it rules it out? You tried to contact me offwiki - why? (your disclosure issues I'll reply to at COIN), note that disclosure is required everywhere including talk messages, which could even include this as the actual topic is your paid COI. Widefox; talk 15:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- So, a day later and no evidence of this has been presented, and at WP:COIN the consensus of other editors are in agreement with me. Either withdraw, or provide evidence! This currently empty accusation is supported by nobody else, see WP:BOOMERANG. Widefox; talk 12:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Jumping on this again Widefox. As an independent (but now verging on involved) editor, I would recommend removing and ignoring this warning as it is unfounded
samtar {t} 17:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Samtar: How is this unfounded? Have you read WP:HOUNDING and read what Widefox put on my talk page? If not, then maybe you could think it unfounded. If you have read those and didn't get that conclusion, then Widefox should ignore your advice, as the majority should clearly see how accusing Widefox was with multiple conflicts related to me. Widefox, how is 'attempted off-wiki communication' not allowed? Wikipedia allows editors to email other editors freely for a reason. Better communication helps solve issues. I could Skype you if that's help. There's no rule that says COI editors can't off-wiki talk to 100% volunteer editors. Besides, that's ridiculous.--ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 06:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 November 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation finances; Superprotect is gone
- In the media: Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov: propaganda myth or history?
- Traffic report: Death, the Dead, and Spectres are abroad
- Featured content: Christianity, music, and cricket
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 17:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- This is just a repeat of the same claim #Your recent edits, so instead of replying there with any evidence above (requested 3 times) just escalating. This is despite another editor saying to remove the warning [6]. As the topic is your paid editing at WP:COIN#Ɱ, thought I'd better note that here as it has been omitted. Widefox; talk 22:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)