EdJohnston (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
:I understand. In this case, the text was fairly coherent and unlikely to be splitted, but no problem. Cheers, --[[User:Wickey-nl|Wickey-nl]] ([[User talk:Wickey-nl#top|talk]]) 08:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC) |
:I understand. In this case, the text was fairly coherent and unlikely to be splitted, but no problem. Cheers, --[[User:Wickey-nl|Wickey-nl]] ([[User talk:Wickey-nl#top|talk]]) 08:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Complaint about edit warring at [[Civilian casualty ratio]] == |
|||
Please see [[WP:AN3#User:Yarron reported by User:Sean.hoyland (Result: )]]. This report claims a 1RR violation by [[User:Yarron]]. While reading the history I notice that you also have reverted twice in 24 hours. It is possible that whoever closes the report might sanction you as well. You might add your own comment at the 3RR noticeboard. It has not escaped my notice that more than one person might be adding non-neutral prose, but even prose that needs removing can get a person in trouble with [[WP:1RR]]. There is an ARBPIA banner on the article's talk page. Thanks, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 18:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:27, 16 June 2014
Resources for maintenance and collaboration |
---|
Cleanup |
Categories |
|
Create an article |
Referencing |
Stubs |
Deletion |
Polishing |
Translation into English |
Images |
Controversy |
To-do lists |
Disambiguation |
More |
|
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard. |
/Archive 1
/Archive 2
/Archive 3
/Archive 4
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
Wikipedia:Footnotes
Wikipedia:Template messages/Section
Template:Which?
Template:Requested move
Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources that are usually not reliable
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
Noticeboards
POICA
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive139#Plot_Spoiler
Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Brewcrewer/list_of_Palestinian_ax_attacks
WARNING
I do not discuss articles here.
--Wickey-nl (talk) 16:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
1rr at Jerusalem
assuming good faith that you forgot about the 1rr restriction I'll you know that you should self revert. thanks.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- ...and at Beit El.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 17:39, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
semi-protected
I semi-protected this page and your user page. Feel free to ask if you want the protection removed. Zerotalk 13:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
For interest
Hi, regarding "Superfluous tags within one citation", for interest, there are a couple of reasons why I often tend to cite every sentence in ARBPIA. For me, it helps to keep track of exactly where things have come from while the section is being developed, especially when there are multiple sources at play and the content is in a state of flux. Also, when an article is likely to be targeted by sockpuppets, editors who have clearly decided that they do not need to follow the rules, the content tends shredded over time as they tamper with it, sometimes to the extent that it is no longer possible to tell where anything comes from. Sean.hoyland - talk 08:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- I understand. In this case, the text was fairly coherent and unlikely to be splitted, but no problem. Cheers, --Wickey-nl (talk) 08:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Complaint about edit warring at Civilian casualty ratio
Please see WP:AN3#User:Yarron reported by User:Sean.hoyland (Result: ). This report claims a 1RR violation by User:Yarron. While reading the history I notice that you also have reverted twice in 24 hours. It is possible that whoever closes the report might sanction you as well. You might add your own comment at the 3RR noticeboard. It has not escaped my notice that more than one person might be adding non-neutral prose, but even prose that needs removing can get a person in trouble with WP:1RR. There is an ARBPIA banner on the article's talk page. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)