Ahrtoodeetoo (talk | contribs) →May 2019: new section |
173.54.120.246 (talk) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== May 2019 == |
== May 2019 == |
||
Hey Ahrtoodeetoo, Please go ahead and tell mommy you’re upset. PLEASE REPORT ME. It would be a badge of honor to have the “Democratic Party version of truth (Wikipedia - English Language)” boot me after 10 years because you and they are afraid of me opening an RfC on a talk page. |
|||
You have previously been warned not to re-open closed RfCs. If you re-open [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Spygate_(conspiracy_theory)&oldid=898145637#RfC:_conspiracy_theory this RfC] again I will report you. [[User:Ahrtoodeetoo|R2]] <small>([[User talk:Ahrtoodeetoo|bleep]])</small> 17:44, 21 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
It is absolutely ridiculous that we can’t have a discussion on a talk page because some people disagree with my question (see the inaccurately title article “Spygate (conspiracy theory)”[[Special:Contributions/173.54.120.246|173.54.120.246]] ([[User talk:173.54.120.246|talk]]) 18:18, 21 May 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:18, 21 May 2019
I know it's annoying, but the New York Times thing really isn't helping get the DM block removed
I get angry at the way the debate around the DM is so illogical and filled with prejudice as well, but the New York Times thing isn't helping, and may get you banned. Best take a chill pill. Even if the vote goes against unblocking the DM we've put a pretty good peg in the ground for having another debate on this in six months which we have every chance of winning. Keep your powder dry for that. FOARP (talk) 20:25, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thatnk you for the feedback FOARP. This is NOT about the Daily Mail. This is only about the NYT. The DM is a whole separate issue for me.
May 2019
Hey Ahrtoodeetoo, Please go ahead and tell mommy you’re upset. PLEASE REPORT ME. It would be a badge of honor to have the “Democratic Party version of truth (Wikipedia - English Language)” boot me after 10 years because you and they are afraid of me opening an RfC on a talk page.
It is absolutely ridiculous that we can’t have a discussion on a talk page because some people disagree with my question (see the inaccurately title article “Spygate (conspiracy theory)”173.54.120.246 (talk) 18:18, 21 May 2019 (UTC)