Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
:You repeatedly changing content to your preferred term against the clear consensus of other editors is disruptive and needs to stop. There has already been a talk page discussion where you made baseless accusations against other editors as well: [[Talk:Child's Play (2019 film)#Edit warring]]. Logging out of Wikipedia and continuing to make those edits as an IP editor is also [[WP:SOCKPUPPETRY|entirely inappropriate]]. – [[User:Wallyfromdilbert|wallyfromdilbert]] ([[User talk:Wallyfromdilbert|talk]]) 00:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC) |
:You repeatedly changing content to your preferred term against the clear consensus of other editors is disruptive and needs to stop. There has already been a talk page discussion where you made baseless accusations against other editors as well: [[Talk:Child's Play (2019 film)#Edit warring]]. Logging out of Wikipedia and continuing to make those edits as an IP editor is also [[WP:SOCKPUPPETRY|entirely inappropriate]]. – [[User:Wallyfromdilbert|wallyfromdilbert]] ([[User talk:Wallyfromdilbert|talk]]) 00:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
::What policy am I breaking.. By changing it to the proper term. You can below all you like about disruptive editing. I'm sure I could find a bunch of editors who would contend the term is 'title.' I will continue to change the term even if I am banned under other accounts until someone other than you becomes involved. You're not the king of this page. I've requested moderation and if they agree with you, I will abide by that. ([[User:Sellpink|Sellpink]] ([[User talk:Sellpink|talk]]) 03:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)) |
::What policy am I breaking.. By changing it to the proper term. You can below all you like about disruptive editing. I'm sure I could find a bunch of editors who would contend the term is 'title.' I will continue to change the term even if I am banned under other accounts until someone other than you becomes involved. You're not the king of this page. I've requested moderation and if they agree with you, I will abide by that. ([[User:Sellpink|Sellpink]] ([[User talk:Sellpink|talk]]) 03:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)) |
||
:::Your request for an administrator has already been answered. Apparently not reading what others have written is a recurring problem for you. – [[User:Wallyfromdilbert|wallyfromdilbert]] ([[User talk:Wallyfromdilbert|talk]]) 16:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC) |
:::Your request for an administrator has already been answered. Apparently not reading what others have written is a recurring problem for you. – [[User:Wallyfromdilbert|wallyfromdilbert]] ([[User talk:Wallyfromdilbert|talk]]) 16:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC) And clearly having a severe mental illness and no life to speak of beyond living for Wiki drama. I feel sad for you, you are so pathetic! ([[User:Sellpink|Sellpink]] ([[User talk:Sellpink|talk]]) 00:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)) |
||
So if a certain group of users on a certain page deem that 'apple' is more appropriate than either 'title' or 'name' should that stand?? What is the sense in that and where in Wikipedia policy does it state that any users get to vote on which word should be used. I don't recall encyclopedias where users get to vote on their favorite term. It's not a contest. Now you are intentionally going out of your way to revert edits I made that you previously had no involvement in.That's essentially stalking and trying to create more edit wars. How do you want this resolved? Should we take it to WP:ANI? Let me know headcase! ([[User:Sellpink|Sellpink]] ([[User talk:Sellpink|talk]]) 00:28, 17 November 2021 (UTC)) |
So if a certain group of users on a certain page deem that 'apple' is more appropriate than either 'title' or 'name' should that stand?? What is the sense in that and where in Wikipedia policy does it state that any users get to vote on which word should be used. I don't recall encyclopedias where users get to vote on their favorite term. It's not a contest. Now you are intentionally going out of your way to revert edits I made that you previously had no involvement in.That's essentially stalking and trying to create more edit wars. How do you want this resolved? Should we take it to WP:ANI? Let me know headcase! ([[User:Sellpink|Sellpink]] ([[User talk:Sellpink|talk]]) 00:28, 17 November 2021 (UTC)) |
Revision as of 00:30, 17 November 2021
|
|||
Precious anniversary
Two years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's a political thriller film, and also a neo-noir film. The reliable sources are here [1][2]. See WP:RS.--Beta Lohman (talk) 14:30, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- The lead for a film should only list its primary genre or subgenre (WP:FILMLEAD), and this should be based on what genres are most commonly used in the sources. Three genres in the lead seems excessive, especially when the ones you mention are rarely used in the sources, and none of the sources put them together in that way. Looking through the sources in the current article, "drama" seems to be by far the most commonly used genre, followed by "thriller" and then "crime". "Neo-noir" is not used in any of the sources, although "noir" is used in a few, including one that says a "noir-style drama" and the source that you cited above from NPR which describes it as a "modern-day noir" in prose and a "undernourished noir" in the headline, but lists its genre in the article as "Crime, Drama". "Mystery" is also used in a few sources, as well as "action". "Political thriller" is used in one source, and "political crime thriller" is used in one other. I think either "drama" or "thriller" is most appropriate, although I think "crime thriller" would also be appropriate. "Political thriller" seems fairly similar to "crime thriller", but "neo-noir" is definitely not used frequently or directly enough in the sources to be included in the lead. If you want to discuss this further, then please use the article's talk page so that other interested editors can be aware of the discussion, rather than on my user talk page. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Slappy and the Stinkers
An IP has tried to remove information from this article for months, and the other editor had no source for their edit themselves. Two weeks is a minimum film release in a theater, thus that explanation on why. Nate • (chatter) 06:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how your response addresses the unsourced information you restored in your edit. The content added by the user Anonymous3525 in the production section is supported by the Variety source. I am going to remove the content about "mainly intended as a direct-to-video release" and the "contractual minimums" language until we can find a source for that. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 20:04, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Short description
Please read my talk page! —It'sCtrlwiki • talk • 06:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Stop removing short descriptions that have been added to articles. Your edits are disruptive and are senselessly removing the hard work of many editors. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 06:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ctrlwiki:, I can't help noticing that you failed to notify this editor of the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Wallyfromdilbert. You are likely headed for a WP:BOOMERANG. BD2412 T 07:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Child's Play (2019)
Why don't you explain to me how changing terms from "name of the movie" to "title of the movie" is in any way "disruptive editing" when that 100% factually the term for it? If you attempt to block me from any page based on what appears to be an absurd contention, you can be assured I will not let that stand and I will get as many editors involved needed to fight this. I don't believe that you and you alone are the ultimate authority on what can be posted on this page. Are you actually saying that changing the term to the accurate term ('title') is somehow disruptive or against policy? Explain that please (Sellpink (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC))
- You repeatedly changing content to your preferred term against the clear consensus of other editors is disruptive and needs to stop. There has already been a talk page discussion where you made baseless accusations against other editors as well: Talk:Child's Play (2019 film)#Edit warring. Logging out of Wikipedia and continuing to make those edits as an IP editor is also entirely inappropriate. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 00:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- What policy am I breaking.. By changing it to the proper term. You can below all you like about disruptive editing. I'm sure I could find a bunch of editors who would contend the term is 'title.' I will continue to change the term even if I am banned under other accounts until someone other than you becomes involved. You're not the king of this page. I've requested moderation and if they agree with you, I will abide by that. (Sellpink (talk) 03:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC))
- Your request for an administrator has already been answered. Apparently not reading what others have written is a recurring problem for you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 16:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC) And clearly having a severe mental illness and no life to speak of beyond living for Wiki drama. I feel sad for you, you are so pathetic! (Sellpink (talk) 00:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC))
- What policy am I breaking.. By changing it to the proper term. You can below all you like about disruptive editing. I'm sure I could find a bunch of editors who would contend the term is 'title.' I will continue to change the term even if I am banned under other accounts until someone other than you becomes involved. You're not the king of this page. I've requested moderation and if they agree with you, I will abide by that. (Sellpink (talk) 03:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC))
So if a certain group of users on a certain page deem that 'apple' is more appropriate than either 'title' or 'name' should that stand?? What is the sense in that and where in Wikipedia policy does it state that any users get to vote on which word should be used. I don't recall encyclopedias where users get to vote on their favorite term. It's not a contest. Now you are intentionally going out of your way to revert edits I made that you previously had no involvement in.That's essentially stalking and trying to create more edit wars. How do you want this resolved? Should we take it to WP:ANI? Let me know headcase! (Sellpink (talk) 00:28, 17 November 2021 (UTC))