MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:WLU/Archive 5. |
67.204.42.122 (talk) →Parental alienation: 2 editors who advocate for child abuse |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
:The fact that they are part of the virtual library of the canadian Children's Rights Council is beside the point. Look at the content linked. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:JaniceMT|JaniceMT]] ([[User talk:JaniceMT|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JaniceMT|contribs]]) 18:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
:The fact that they are part of the virtual library of the canadian Children's Rights Council is beside the point. Look at the content linked. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:JaniceMT|JaniceMT]] ([[User talk:JaniceMT|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JaniceMT|contribs]]) 18:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
::Please review [[Wikipedia:Convenience_link#Reliability]] and [[Wikipedia:Convenience_link#Arguments_against_convenience_links]] - CCRC regularly edits the storyies, highlighting "important" parts. It hits against all three reasons why particular convenience links should not be used. [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 19:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC) |
::Please review [[Wikipedia:Convenience_link#Reliability]] and [[Wikipedia:Convenience_link#Arguments_against_convenience_links]] - CCRC regularly edits the storyies, highlighting "important" parts. It hits against all three reasons why particular convenience links should not be used. [[User:WLU|WLU]] <small>[[User talk:WLU|(t)]] [[Special:Contributions/WLU|(c)]] Wikipedia's rules:</small>[[WP:SIMPLE|<sup><span style='color:#FFA500'>simple</span></sup>]]/[[WP:POL|<sub><span style='color:#008080'>complex</span></sub>]] 19:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
Strangely you objected to the list of Canadian court cases webpage which has both favourable and unfavourable cases. Why? |
|||
The 2 editors that you refer to obviusly have a slant in favourt of child abusers that perptrate this horrible form of child abuse know as parental alienation. So then , you 2 editors are dfamaging Wikipedia by using your very narrow point of view . Get a life! In any even the section on the Canadian Children's Rights Council on parental alienation is fabulous and gets thousands of visitors daily. It's the most visited website in Canada pertaining to child rights. So then, you condone this form of child abuse![[Special:Contributions/67.204.42.122|67.204.42.122]] ([[User talk:67.204.42.122|talk]]) 18:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Howdy, could use your help for a sec.... == |
== Howdy, could use your help for a sec.... == |
Revision as of 18:30, 20 May 2009
Please note that I usually don't do e-mail; if it's about wikipedia use my talk page. |
If I judge it requires discretion, I'll contact you. This is tremendously one-sided. I assure you, I feel terrible about it. Really I do. |
Template:Archive box collapsible
Impersonation?
Um, you're not running multiple accounts for any reason, are you? Would you take a look at this note left on my talk page, supposedly signed by you? (It's in response to this pointed message about a blatant, but repeatedly denied, copyvio.)
It might have been an inadvertent mistake, but this user is not "winning friends and influencing people", so I'm not sure how much good faith is appropriate to assume. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
3rr
Sadly he's at four now. I will report it unless you are doing it currently.--Slp1 (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar of Persistance
Yep, I stuffed up. Didn't realise that your sig was at the bottom of the box. Apologies for the whole mess up. And i'm not an AIDS denialist, just someone trying to even up the balance of bias. Anyway, that doesn't matter, sorry again MrAnderson7 (talk) 22:20, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Unless there is a joke or relationship I am not aware of, it strikes me as extremely uncivil. I don't care if my signature was accidentally included, but I do take umbrage to bastardizing one of the few gestures we can use to acknowledge good works into an insult, irrespective of how WAID took it. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 22:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- You have made your point overtly clear and I'll take it on board for future reference.MrAnderson7 (talk) 03:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Parental alienation
You keep taking off valuable links scontent that meets of exceeds all standards for Wikipedia. You falsely claim that the content on the wesbite of the virutal library of the Canadian Children's Rights Council is a copyright violation. It isn't.
You have reduced the web page to nothing in a destructive manner.JaniceMT (talk) 18:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- The articles that are linked are from such sources as the Florida Bar Association , The Canadian Bar Association and a study by Nicholas Bala of Queen's university, a professor whose work has been cited 27 times by the Supreme Court of Canada.
- The fact that they are part of the virtual library of the canadian Children's Rights Council is beside the point. Look at the content linked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JaniceMT (talk • contribs) 18:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Please review Wikipedia:Convenience_link#Reliability and Wikipedia:Convenience_link#Arguments_against_convenience_links - CCRC regularly edits the storyies, highlighting "important" parts. It hits against all three reasons why particular convenience links should not be used. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 19:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Strangely you objected to the list of Canadian court cases webpage which has both favourable and unfavourable cases. Why?
The 2 editors that you refer to obviusly have a slant in favourt of child abusers that perptrate this horrible form of child abuse know as parental alienation. So then , you 2 editors are dfamaging Wikipedia by using your very narrow point of view . Get a life! In any even the section on the Canadian Children's Rights Council on parental alienation is fabulous and gets thousands of visitors daily. It's the most visited website in Canada pertaining to child rights. So then, you condone this form of child abuse!67.204.42.122 (talk) 18:30, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Howdy, could use your help for a sec....
Hi, hope you are well. You put on my user page the hide templates on my welcome page section and esp. the graphics. But they aren't hidden like they should be. I've tried to figure out what the problem is but for the life of me I can't seem to get them to hide under the hide/show bar. Could you help me out? My user page is getting too long and I think some of the things like the welcome page, images, and even the essays could be more useful if they were in a hide box. Sorry I can't think of the proper terminolgy right now, rough night, no sleep. Anyways, if you have time and can help me out I'd appreciate it. I have problems with coding like a lot of what you did to my user page. I have learned a lot though from you working on my page so maybe if you fix it I can figure out why I couldn't. :( ;) Thanks, I'll be in touch. I figure I have two maybe three weeks left before I go on break. As always, take your time, --CrohnieGalTalk 11:57, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Crohnie,
- The two boxes at the bottom? They're both hidden on my browser, but your barnstar box isn't capturing the Awesome Wikipedian barnstar (if that's not deliberate, you can fix it by moving the {{divhide}} text to the bottom of the section). Sometimes the browsers leave them open (something to do with the cache I think - try holding down control and clicking on the reload button if using internet explorer, or control-shift-R for Mozilla/Firefox). If you're really concerned, I would suggest moving some of the text or useful links to a sub-page, like your talk page archive. Aside from that, the page seems to be OK. The only other thing I can think of is adding |show = no to them, but I really think it's just an issue with your browser and not for most other people's. I'll try to remember to check on my other computer as well.
- Speaking of talk page archives, you're up to archive 17 already, but only archive 1 is showing up on your talk page. I assume this is an oversight? The reason you've got so many is MiszaBot is set to create a new page after 60K, which isn't very much. I've got mine set to 250K, which is pretty standard I think. Means you don't have to create links to your archives manually every couple months. I can fix it if you'd like - both the size and the lack of links to each archive (or you could do it yourself, it's good practice!)
- So in two-three weeks you're offline for a while? I'm assuming the lack of sleep is worry...keep me posted, via e-mail or talk page. I'll cross my fingers. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 13:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)