Justice007 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. |
||
{{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]]. |
|||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
Unbelievable editwar you've gone into with the IP and 3 users, a sure way to get blocked. --<span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:TopGun|<b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b>]] ([[User talk:TopGun|<b style="color:#000">talk</b>]])</span> 02:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:05, 18 December 2014
Welcome!
Hello, VandVictory, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Darkness Shines (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kingdom of Holland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Information Relating to All Ages and Nations" - 347, author = Joseph Haydn, George Cary Eggleston}}</ref> Originally the arms of the new kingdom were to be like those of the [[Kingdom of Italy (
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Welcome
Hi. Welcome to editing in Wikipedia, which is a collective encyclopedia. I politely bring to your notice that we need reliable and credible sources to add some important informations; and one such information is about Dwarakadhish temple, wherein it is claimed that the temple is 2500 years old. But the sources provided are travel guides, which are hardly reliable sources to support 2500 years old theory. We may need sources written by famous historians for such facts. I politely write this to you and I hope you will understand my point. All the best. :) Rayabhari (talk) 16:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Fine, I will add, I know I've got some.
Archiving
Please do not use OneClickArchiver on a noticeboard like WP:AN or WP:ANI. Those pages are managed satisfactorily by a bot which archives the pages and updates iincoming links. At any rate, archiving of frequently used noticeboards should not be undertaken on an ad hoc basis. Johnuniq (talk) 06:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. As someone who has edited this article recently, I am bringing your attention to a proposed set of restrictions at Talk:Ayurveda#Going forward. I see this action as necessary to allow harmonious editing at the article, and to prevent more blocks going forward. Best regards, --John (talk) 20:47, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ambulatory care may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ** In the United States, the [[Urgent Care Association of America]] (UCAOA)] estimates that over 15,000 urgent care centers deliver urgent care services. These centers are
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -TheSawTooth (talk) 00:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- You have done 4 revisions. Undo your revision or I will report your account. ---TheSawTooth (talk) 00:32, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Unbelievable editwar you've gone into with the IP and 3 users, a sure way to get blocked. --lTopGunl (talk) 02:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC)