CG Soldier Rage (talk | contribs) |
→The Laws of Dashism: new section |
||
Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
That'll be good. [[User:V-Dash|V-Dash]] ([[User talk:V-Dash|talk]]) 23:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC) |
That'll be good. [[User:V-Dash|V-Dash]] ([[User talk:V-Dash|talk]]) 23:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
== The Laws of Dashism == |
|||
As you can plainly see, I have a newfound passion in Dashism. Dashism is my ideal philosophy. It's more philosophy than religion. It's a way of thinking and interpreting details. |
|||
Now, I will point out the common buffoons that are basically agents against Dashism. |
|||
Wandering_Hero- This guy's a nutter. No really, he is. He spends his day locked in on the computer trying to find all of my hidy holes, but he's a bit on the...well, you get the point. |
|||
Tune in next time as I provided the name of another agent against Dashism. [[User:V-Dash|V-Dash]] ([[User talk:V-Dash|talk]]) 06:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:21, 28 November 2007
September 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Digimon World: Dawn and Dusk. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Владимир И. Сува Чего? 20:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Digimon World: Dawn and Dusk, you will be blocked from editing. Владимир И. Сува Чего? 20:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
LoZ:LA
If you want to have a genre debate (which is a hard fight to win with Zelda), do so on the discussion page. Zixor 09:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Stop reverting the genre. Discuss your opinion on the discussion page. You'll be reported if it happens again. Zixor 02:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Forgive me for my previous shortness, but my concern has little to do with this specific debate. I'm not advocating the current genre choice any more than I am your revision. -This isn't the way to solve the issue though. You need to stop simply forcing your opinion through reversion, and actually make your case on the discussion page. Otherwise you'll get nothing accomplished and merely create problems for everyone. Zixor 03:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 04:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Phantom Hourglass genre dispute
So what is your reason for changing the genre in this game's article to RPG? You have stated nothing other than so far that some completely unofficial site has stated it is one, which isn't a valid reason. Haipa Doragon (talk) 19:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Can you please disscuss on the talk page before making changes no one agrees with? The Placebo Effect 20:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Discuss? No, not until you lot learn to stop contradicting yourselves.V-Dash 22:48, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Dlong 14:39, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- you have been blocked for 24 hours. When you return you are requested to use article talk pages tp reach a consensus on contentious content rather then disrupting the project by edit warring. Spartaz Humbug! 22:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Dlong 20:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Everyone on the HPB. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
John Cena is the best wrestler
It is nice to see a fellow Cena fan on Wikipedia.Emplaya 19:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
It is nice to see two of you guys here. Hey Emplaya, it's me. CG_Soldier_Rage--CG Soldier Rage (talk) 01:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Beg your pardon?
Hello, there. I'm a Wikipedia administrator. Regarding this edit and this edit, that sort of behavior is not at all welcome on Wikipedia. If you have a disagreement with this user, please feel free to make use of the dispute resolution process; otherwise, please bear in mind that Wikipedia strives to welcome many people from many cultures and walks of life, and that behavior such as that could be construed as both harassment and vandalism, both of which can lead to user(s) being blocked from editing. Wikipedia isn't a battleground, we're here to work together, not to "pwn hard." – Luna Santin (talk) 23:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
October 2007
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass. Thank you. Please DISCUSS the game type on the talk page, but most of us are pretty sure this is a action-adventure game MASEM 02:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
John Cena shall be champion again
Always bashing John Cena for no reason. Cena rules. THE CHAMP IS HERE. He never lost the title, and he will gain it back as only he is worthy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emplaya (talk • contribs) 00:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
GO JOHN CENA--CG Soldier Rage (talk) 01:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
A note to Action
Wow dude, you're pathetic. Not only are you the world's biggest geek and nerd, but you are also a complete ass. Give it up trying to fake intelligence because you lack the brain capacity to string together even the most simplest of points.
How cute. The little turdball is getting mad because someone's dissing his favorite game. Save the excuse for someone who cares Action because I don't. You're a geek and that's all there is to it. Do the world a favor and ram your head into a wall.
How pathetic. A "momma joke." Dude, that's soo played out. Perhaps you need a crash course on how to NOT bastardize the English language.
November 2007
With regard to your comments on User:V-Dash: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Nn123645 03:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Should be happy to see this.[[1]] See the system does work if you let it :).Nn123645 04:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 03:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
November 3rd, 2007: Caution
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pokémon Diamond and Pearl. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. You have already exceeded the number of revisions permitted within the 24-hour period. If you make another, you will be reported for violating WP:3RR. MelicansMatkin 21:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:V-Dash. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MelicansMatkin 22:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
What treachery is this?
Vandalism to V-Dash's talk page? I AM V-DASH. How can I be marked for editing MY own talk page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by V-Dash (talk • contribs) 22:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- You were marked for removing a cautionary warning regarding WP:3RR from your talk page; removing/editing comments made by other users is frowned upon on Wikipedia, especially when it comes to removing warnings that serve only to let you know when Wikipedia policy is being broken, and encouraging you to express yourself in a constructive manner. MelicansMatkin 22:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Proof that I did not edit your profile
Hello, this is MetricTrout. As you can see, my IP address is 4.156.201.101. The IP address of the guy who vandalized your profile is 64.90.92.236.
Also, lol. The Wikipedia moderators found you guilty of vandalizing your own profile as well.
- V-Dash did not vandalize his own profile. What he did was remove a caution from his talk page, something discouraged. No warning would have been issued if it had been archived instead of removed. Also, please do not try to escalate a conflict. A difference in the IP address means nothing for the record; the anonynous edits could have been made using a laptop, a library computer, etc, although the only edits that the IP 64.90.92.236 made were on V-Dash's userpage and user talk page. That IP address has also been warned on this. MelicansMatkin 23:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Metric and his sidekick Action/Lufia have been vandalizing my profile. You can't give geeks access to a computer as they speak in their own language when dealing with computers.
Personal attacks
You've been warned, over and over again, about personal attacks, but you've continued to do so here and here. If I catch one more whiff of this, you will be blocked. -- RG2 00:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I'll vouche for the first one, but the second is entirely this site's fault. If you want me to stop attacking them, then tell those guys to quit vandalizing my profile.
- Enough. You are both at fault here for your comments towards each other. You don't need a reason to stop attacking them, just do it. Stop antagonizing them and they will return the favour. MelicansMatkin 02:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Serebii.net Reference
Instead of arguing in another edit war, I thought I would bring the issue to your awareness here. The problem with using Serebii.net is that it is a fansite, and fansites are not considered to be a reliable source for an article. The problem with Pokemon is that most of the information is not cited by reliable sources. This is one reason why it is so hard to reference the Pokemon articles. It is the same with all of the major Pokemon fansites; Bulbapedia, Poke Beach, and Serebii are only a few of the fansites that are frequently cited, by new editors. Unfortunately, because of their fansite status, their references all have to be removed where possible. MelicansMatkin 03:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Understood, but why is Bulbapedia on the reference list?
- On the article itself, or on the references that can't be used? If it is used in the article itself, it shouldn't be. It's likely that it was added as a temporary measure until a more useable source could be found. If you're asking why it can't be used as a reference it's because no matter how professional it is (and no matter how much I wish it could be used as a reference), it is still a fansite. It's very difficult to find any useable references for the Pokemon articles, exclusing Pokemon.com (which often doesn't contain the needed information anyways). For information on individual Pokemon, it's the games and handbooks that have to be used. For the characters we have to use the games and the episodes. It's a very tedious process! MelicansMatkin 04:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Pokémon Diamond and Pearl
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pokémon Diamond and Pearl. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. -- ReyBrujo 04:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Why do you insist on not DISCUSSING things on the talk page? You would save yourself a lot of grief if you did. Are you that stubborn? -Sukecchi 11:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Let me guess, you reversed the edit? Well Suke, for one thing, POKEMON DIAMOND IS A DAMN RPG!!!!!!! Just because a select few of you hate to see that doesn't mean Pokemon isn't an RPG.V-Dash 14:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- We understand that its an rpg, a Console RPG is till an RPG. THe only reason gamesites just call it an RPG is because its easier. The Placebo Effect 14:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
It'd be simpler to call it an RPG, which is what all official sites do. V-Dash 14:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- This is such a pointless edit war. A console RPG is still an RPG, it's just being specific. I don't understand what this furor is all about. Just leave it at console RPG. For example, fish is very generalized. A shark is more specific but still pretty general. Do we call a Tiger shark a fish? Yes, it's a type of fish, but most people will still call it a shark. All we're doing by calling it a shark is being nmore specific than just calling it a fish. MelicansMatkin 15:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
People wouldn't be as pissed with you if you discussed these changes on the talk page, but you instate countless edit wars by doing as you please. It's not helpful and it needs to STOP. -Sukecchi 16:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Suke, things would be peachy if you weren't so sensitive to every bloody thing. Anyhow, fish =/= games. Traditional genres used today are Action, Adventure, RPG, FPS, Platform, Puzzle, Fighting, and Simulators. Pokemon is an RPG. If you guys are going to call it a console RPG, then you need to have evidence other than the contradictory statements here.V-Dash 20:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
(the last time it was put here, it was only your second revert, since you've reverted since then: You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.
Stop attacking other editors
V-Dash, did you even read what A. Exeunt posted? It applies to you too. Just accept that consensus is against you. Stop attacking other editors. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia, the first step is in treating other editors politely. I suggest that you read WP:Etiquette, WP:POINT, WP:Civility, WP:Consensus, WP:NPA, and WP:DR. You have gone against every single one of these policies, and if you expect anyone to respect your opinions you need to follow them first. MelicansMatkin 20:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
You're the last to talk as the lot of you have contradicted your supposed ideas. I suggest you to read up on who owns Pokemon and who doesn't.V-Dash 01:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- We have all tried to treat you politely and with courtesy, and yet you have done nothing but attack and insult everyone who tries to discuss the matter with you. I honestly have no real opinion on whether to keep it as "Console RPG" or change it to "RPG". My concern is with your conduct towards other editors. MelicansMatkin 01:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I haven't attacked anyone. I merely responded with an aggressive voice. V-Dash 01:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- If you were to read the pages that I linked to above, you would see that an "agressive voice" is frowned upon on Wikipedia. MelicansMatkin 01:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Then perhaps you lot need to stop contradicting your words. V-Dash 02:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Please explain what "we lot" have contradicted. In any case, "contradiction" (if it has happened) does not justify a violation of Wikipedia policy. MelicansMatkin 02:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for confirming. Polite? Bs. Contradictory isn't polite. You lot attacked me when I said Zelda was an RPG since Nintendo called it an Adventure game. Well Nintendo ALSO calls Pokemon an RPG, yet you lot are whining because I proved you wrong.V-Dash 04:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. MASEM 00:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pokémon Diamond and Pearl. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. -- The Placebo Effect 01:27, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
-Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 02:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- I have extended your block to 10 days for circumventing your block as User:DOTEmerzon. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 01:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Your Userpage
I have fully protected your userpage to keep it from being vandalized. If you want it unprotected, email me or contact me on my userpage with this account. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 05:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, but I prefer it to be protected.V-Dash (talk) 19:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Alright. Do you want me to semi-protect the page when the current full-protection ends? -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 22:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
That'll be good. V-Dash (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
The Laws of Dashism
As you can plainly see, I have a newfound passion in Dashism. Dashism is my ideal philosophy. It's more philosophy than religion. It's a way of thinking and interpreting details.
Now, I will point out the common buffoons that are basically agents against Dashism.
Wandering_Hero- This guy's a nutter. No really, he is. He spends his day locked in on the computer trying to find all of my hidy holes, but he's a bit on the...well, you get the point.
Tune in next time as I provided the name of another agent against Dashism. V-Dash (talk) 06:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)