Content deleted Content added
Trut-h-urts man (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Darkfrog24 (talk | contribs) →RfC at talk:Oathkeeper: new section |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
:No worries - I figured you had to be maybe a couple seconds behind me, because after I undid it back I went to the Xbox One page and saw your self revert. [[User:Trut-h-urts_man|<span style="color:blue">'''''Trut-h-urts man'''''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Trut-h-urts_man|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trut-h-urts_man|C]]) </small> 19:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC) |
:No worries - I figured you had to be maybe a couple seconds behind me, because after I undid it back I went to the Xbox One page and saw your self revert. [[User:Trut-h-urts_man|<span style="color:blue">'''''Trut-h-urts man'''''</span>]] <small>([[User talk:Trut-h-urts_man|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trut-h-urts_man|C]]) </small> 19:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
== RfC at talk:Oathkeeper == |
|||
You are being contacted because you have made substantial edits to the article [[Oathkeeper]]. |
|||
There is an RfC at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Oathkeeper#RfC:_Is_Westeros.org_a_suitable_source_for_this_content.3F Oathkeeper] regarding whether the site Westeros.org meets the criteria for an expert [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] (and is therefore suitable for use on Wikipedia). It is being cited as a source for the statement "This episode was based on [specific chapters of] [specific book]." Participation is welcome. 00:04, 3 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:04, 3 September 2014
Welcome
|
Scott Maine
Is this a good edit that I did to the page Scott Maine.Kingryan227 (Decrees • Acts) 20:36, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- The draft stuff should probably stick together, as he didn't sign with either team. Other than that, I'd say it's a good one. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 20:42, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Beat me to it.
I have never thanked anyone for reverting me, but thanks. I was reverting it, but it edit conflicted with you. Good heads up. Chambr (talk) 19:29, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- No worries - I figured you had to be maybe a couple seconds behind me, because after I undid it back I went to the Xbox One page and saw your self revert. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 19:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
RfC at talk:Oathkeeper
You are being contacted because you have made substantial edits to the article Oathkeeper.
There is an RfC at Oathkeeper regarding whether the site Westeros.org meets the criteria for an expert self-published source (and is therefore suitable for use on Wikipedia). It is being cited as a source for the statement "This episode was based on [specific chapters of] [specific book]." Participation is welcome. 00:04, 3 September 2014 (UTC)