Catiline63 (talk | contribs) →Hannibal: new section |
Backslash Forwardslash (talk | contribs) →Hannibal: note about AIV |
||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
Your statement: "image of roman (''sic'') which cleary state (''sic'') that "it is not authentic" (''sic'') and definately (''sic'') not of hannibal (''sic'')" is OR. |
Your statement: "image of roman (''sic'') which cleary state (''sic'') that "it is not authentic" (''sic'') and definately (''sic'') not of hannibal (''sic'')" is OR. |
||
The text attached to the image clearly states that it is Roman/Capuan and only "MAY not be" an authentic image of Hannibal - not that it is "not authentic... definately not of hannibal", as you so confidently aver. The first statement is sourced, yours is not. If you have a better source, give it. Nor is the image of a "Roman" - the helmet alone is a give-away for that. [[User:Catiline63|Catiline63]] ([[User talk:Catiline63|talk]]) 00:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
The text attached to the image clearly states that it is Roman/Capuan and only "MAY not be" an authentic image of Hannibal - not that it is "not authentic... definately not of hannibal", as you so confidently aver. The first statement is sourced, yours is not. If you have a better source, give it. Nor is the image of a "Roman" - the helmet alone is a give-away for that. [[User:Catiline63|Catiline63]] ([[User talk:Catiline63|talk]]) 00:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
==AIV edits== |
|||
Hello. I have, for the second time, declined the AIV report on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=294906667&oldid=294906300 Catiline63]. This is because you appear to be in a content dispute, and Catiline63 is not engaging is obvious vandalism. Discuss the use of the image on the talk page, and consider following the steps of [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. \ [[User:Backslash Forwardslash|Backslash Forwardslash]] / {[[User_Talk: Backslash Forwardslash|talk]]} 04:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:11, 7 June 2009
Welcome
|
Hannibal
Your statement: "image of roman (sic) which cleary state (sic) that "it is not authentic" (sic) and definately (sic) not of hannibal (sic)" is OR. The text attached to the image clearly states that it is Roman/Capuan and only "MAY not be" an authentic image of Hannibal - not that it is "not authentic... definately not of hannibal", as you so confidently aver. The first statement is sourced, yours is not. If you have a better source, give it. Nor is the image of a "Roman" - the helmet alone is a give-away for that. Catiline63 (talk) 00:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
AIV edits
Hello. I have, for the second time, declined the AIV report on Catiline63. This is because you appear to be in a content dispute, and Catiline63 is not engaging is obvious vandalism. Discuss the use of the image on the talk page, and consider following the steps of dispute resolution. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 04:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)