TranscendentMe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Horse Eye's Back (talk | contribs) →January 2021: new section |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TranscendentMe reported by User:Normchou (Result: )]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. <span style="border-radius:9em;padding:0 7px;background:#555">[[User:Normchou|<span style="color:#FFF">'''Normchou'''</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Normchou|💬]]</sup> 20:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC) |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TranscendentMe reported by User:Normchou (Result: )]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. <span style="border-radius:9em;padding:0 7px;background:#555">[[User:Normchou|<span style="color:#FFF">'''Normchou'''</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Normchou|💬]]</sup> 20:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
== January 2021 == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Australia–China relations]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#In talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[WP:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. |
|||
Points to note: |
|||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[WP:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to [[WP:Requests for page protection|request temporary page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 16:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:53, 1 January 2021
Edit War is bilateral. Leaving a message on my page doesn't justify your position. I will probably do the same. Instead, go open a section in talk instead of here
December 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Zhao Lijian; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Zhao Lijian. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Internet censorship in China, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Australia–China relations, you may be blocked from editing. Please seek consensus first before adding materials in the Morrison Government section. You are completely ignoring the suggestions on the talk page. Normchou 💬 20:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TranscendentMe reported by User:Normchou (Result: ). Thank you. Normchou 💬 20:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
January 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Australia–China relations; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)