This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Pr.
- Ruhnama - Low priority.
- Hasmukh Dhirajlal Sankalia - Low priority.
- The Story of Civilization - High priority.
- R. C. Majumdar - Medium priority.
- Satish Chandra Mittal - Low priority.
To Read
- THE EVOLUTION OF ANTLER AND BONE CHEEKPIECES FROM THE BALKAN-CARPATHIAN REGION TO CENTRAL KAZAKHSTAN: CHRONOLOGY OF “CHARIOT” CULTURES AND MYCENAEAN GREECE
- Politics, gender, and the Islamic past: The Legacy of ʻAʼisha bint Abi Bakr
The Kashmir Files
[[The Kashmir File#Review by Shubhra Gupta Please adhere to the topic where consensus was built. if you want to change, before changing again make sure to discuss. Dsnb07 (talk)
Reassess GA
TrangaBellam (talk) 07:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Aryacakravarti dynasty
- Gal Vihara
- Portuguese conquest of the Jaffna Kingdom - Imp.
- Munneswaram temple - Imp. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nezak Huns
The article Nezak Huns you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nezak Huns and Talk:Nezak Huns/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
My GA nomination of Yoga and cultural appropriation
Hi TrangaBellam, time is flying past and I don't wish to hassle you – you are under no obligation. It's quite all right if you don't feel like doing this GAN review – your suggestion to use Andrea Jain was already very helpful, thank you. Just let me know if you'd like me to pop it back into the queue. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- I do not get the point of time schedules in a GAR - it takes time to read a topic and make an informed review. For some examples, see Talk:Tuqaq/GA2, Talk:Ormon Khan/GA1, Talk:Battle of Vijithapura/GA2, Talk:Anuradhapura Kingdom/GA2 etc. Obviously, I understand that I am in a minority and most reviewers review everything from Cambrian geology to statistical functions to pop culture without caring to assess the NPOV nature of the content and acucracy. I took to reviewing the article, because I have my own interests in the area.
- Anyway, if you feel constrained by my delays, please feel free to remove my name and throw the review open. If left to me, I will get to the review in this weekend. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Many thanks for telling me your timescale, the weekend will be fine. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Friendly request to WP:REFACTOR
First, thanks for creating a number of articles relevant to our recent discussions. Second, would you kindly revisit your talk page comments at Talk:Glaukopis and consider refactoring them for WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, WP:NPA, WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND? TIA. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- No. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- So now you are accusing me of trolling. (for the record) - GizzyCatBella🍁 17:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @GizzyCatBella See below. Doug Weller talk 17:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. - GizzyCatBella🍁 17:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @GizzyCatBella See below. Doug Weller talk 17:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- I hope we can stay on friendly terms, but, I repeat politely, please refactor your personal attack here, per policies cited. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Obliged. I hope that in future, you won't either slap misplaced NPOV tags while being fairly oblivious about the subject. Thanks! TrangaBellam (talk) 06:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- So now you are accusing me of trolling. (for the record) - GizzyCatBella🍁 17:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
That wasn't trolling
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
But it was a terrible edit summary, a personal attack. I'm surprised. Doug Weller talk 17:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller Look at really bad one this --> if you find that there are reliable historians — though I doubt that you understand the term GizzyCatBella🍁 17:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- If you wish, I can cite the Grabowski paper :-) TrangaBellam (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- That said, I am awaiting your response at Talk:Mariusz Bechta. You seem quite interested in whether I have subscriptions of Polish dailies etc. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- (tpw) I read this as trolling, Doug, because it came after trolling here and here (on an article TB started today). GCB's also trolled me here and Horse Eye's Back here and here, and now there is continued whatever-you-want-to-call-it here. Levivich (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller and @TrangaBellam - it has been mentioned here - GizzyCatBella🍁 18:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- I did not wish to be a party to the case but if you insist, ... :-) TrangaBellam (talk) 18:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @TrangaBellam I don’t insist on nothing else but refactoring your personal attacks. - GizzyCatBella🍁 18:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- I did not wish to be a party to the case but if you insist, ... :-) TrangaBellam (talk) 18:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Levivich, thanks. This is longstanding passive-aggressive behaviour, which I hope, would be addressed in another few months. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- IMO Levivich has a point. In the examples that involved me if it wasn't trolling it was sexual harassment, I did not like the way that interaction made me feel and it did effectively derail the conversation. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, I spotted the particular diffs right now. I agree that this is trolling at best and sexual harassment at worst. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @TrangaBellam Your insinuations are disgusting!- GizzyCatBella🍁 18:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Consider yourself banned from my t/p; any further edits will be reverted on sight. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Textbook DARVO. Levivich (talk) 18:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @TrangaBellam Your insinuations are disgusting!- GizzyCatBella🍁 18:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- There was nothing sexual about my comment to you @Horse Eye's Back. I didn’t mean to do anything like that. - GizzyCatBella🍁 18:21, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- "With whom you want to "hammer out" RS's again Horse Eye's Back?" and "You want to do it with me @Horse Eye's Back ? 🙂" speak for themselves. There is no plausible interpretation of those statements which does not identify them as sexual innuendo. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Horse Eye's Back Remember that English is my second language, I don’t interpret things as you. - GizzyCatBella🍁 18:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller: How is this not trolling? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- "With whom you want to "hammer out" RS's again Horse Eye's Back?" and "You want to do it with me @Horse Eye's Back ? 🙂" speak for themselves. There is no plausible interpretation of those statements which does not identify them as sexual innuendo. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, I spotted the particular diffs right now. I agree that this is trolling at best and sexual harassment at worst. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller and @TrangaBellam - it has been mentioned here - GizzyCatBella🍁 18:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)