Is Catherine Obianuju Acholonu pseudohistorian? Wrong category https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Edit_summary https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Edit_conflict#Resolving_an_edit_conflict https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_articles_needing_factual_verification TrangaBellam (talk) 06:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC) https://www.academia.edu/849388/The_Shahi_Period_A_Reappraisal_of_Archaeological_and_Art_Historical_Sources
Welcome
|
Persecution of Hindus discussion
Hi TrangaBellam, welcome to Wikipedia. At Talk:Persecution of Hindus, you are referring to citations by numbers. Without knowing which revision of the article you are speaking of, those numbers don't have any meaning. Can you go to the history page, pick out the revision that you are commenting on, and add a link to that revision at the top of the discussion? Thanks. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:05, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- I am sorry. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: Done. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: Do you plan to respond? Not sure how to proceed since two editors asked me to get consensus (by reversing my edits) via edit summaries but have not made any objections known over the talk-page. Joshua and Regents seem to be supportive, though. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Not really. It is not my page. Like you, I am also waiting for the other side to come back with a response.
- In general, I think some discussion is warranted regarding the Delhi Sultanate etc. it can't be removed entirely. There are issues like jizya, the prohibition of temple construction (even if it wasn't rigidly enforced) etc. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- I agree completely and will prepare a rewrite. However, I do not find anything minimally salvageable from the current mess. Wait for a couple days or so? TrangaBellam (talk) 18:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: Do you plan to respond? Not sure how to proceed since two editors asked me to get consensus (by reversing my edits) via edit summaries but have not made any objections known over the talk-page. Joshua and Regents seem to be supportive, though. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- TB, may I request you to kindly use your User:TrangaBellam/sandbox to draft the comment and only post on the talk page once you are done with corrections. As you can see here the talk page history is full of your name. It keeps coming on my watchlist. Hope you will understand. --Walrus Ji (talk) 11:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. Sorry. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Beta feature
I saw the edit conflict link on the top of this page. In case it is bothering you, then I suggest using this Help:Paragraph-based Edit Conflict Interface. It helps to resolve it faster. Walrus Ji (talk) 17:57, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. That helps. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:52, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Watch
Please add reference sections
If you add a reference to an unreferenced article, you need to add a Reference section and put a Reflist template in it. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 16:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Ty. Seems same like notelist. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Battle of Talikota
TrangaBellam, I have explained my edits on the page in a new section of the talk page of the article, here. I hope it clarifies your doubts. If you still have any issues, we can discuss it there; I request that you do not revert before that. 183.83.147.136 (talk) 08:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Controversial topic area alerts
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 07:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 07:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)