→Thanks for the barnstar!: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
Line 203: | Line 203: | ||
Glad you found the discussion amusing. [[User:Tewdar|Tewdar]] ([[User talk:Tewdar|talk]]) 20:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC) |
Glad you found the discussion amusing. [[User:Tewdar|Tewdar]] ([[User talk:Tewdar|talk]]) 20:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Notification of discretionary sanctions concerning COVID-19 == |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have shown interest in and edits about [[COVID-19]]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/COVID-19|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
:Your edits/content removal from [[ZyCoV-D]] are clearly covered by discretionary sanctions concerning COVID-19. They are not a part of [[WP:NOTNEWS]] here. They are compiled as per recommended structure followed for [[COVID-19 vaccines]] articles. [[User:Run n Fly|Run n Fly]] ([[User talk:Run n Fly|talk]]) 10:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:47, 11 July 2021
Welcome
|
Persecution of Hindus discussion
Hi TrangaBellam, welcome to Wikipedia. At Talk:Persecution of Hindus, you are referring to citations by numbers. Without knowing which revision of the article you are speaking of, those numbers don't have any meaning. Can you go to the history page, pick out the revision that you are commenting on, and add a link to that revision at the top of the discussion? Thanks. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:05, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- I am sorry. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: Done. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: Do you plan to respond? Not sure how to proceed since two editors asked me to get consensus (by reversing my edits) via edit summaries but have not made any objections known over the talk-page. Joshua and Regents seem to be supportive, though. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Not really. It is not my page. Like you, I am also waiting for the other side to come back with a response.
- In general, I think some discussion is warranted regarding the Delhi Sultanate etc. it can't be removed entirely. There are issues like jizya, the prohibition of temple construction (even if it wasn't rigidly enforced) etc. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- I agree completely and will prepare a rewrite. However, I do not find anything minimally salvageable from the current mess. Wait for a couple days or so? TrangaBellam (talk) 18:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: Do you plan to respond? Not sure how to proceed since two editors asked me to get consensus (by reversing my edits) via edit summaries but have not made any objections known over the talk-page. Joshua and Regents seem to be supportive, though. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- TB, may I request you to kindly use your User:TrangaBellam/sandbox to draft the comment and only post on the talk page once you are done with corrections. As you can see here the talk page history is full of your name. It keeps coming on my watchlist. Hope you will understand. --Walrus Ji (talk) 11:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. Sorry. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Please add reference sections
If you add a reference to an unreferenced article, you need to add a Reference section and put a Reflist template in it. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 16:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Ty. Seems same like notelist. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:11, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Battle of Talikota
TrangaBellam, I have explained my edits on the page in a new section of the talk page of the article, here. I hope it clarifies your doubts. If you still have any issues, we can discuss it there; I request that you do not revert before that. 183.83.147.136 (talk) 08:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Priya Ramani, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 20:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Kautilya3: can you help out? This user is not replying to talk-page messages, copying quotes from all sources and reverting me as a vandal, when reverted. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- That is because you forgot to tag the editor :-) And once you see that your content is being reverted it is better to pause before undoing the revert. Vikram 20:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Also, you can't revert edits in quick succession and expect something to happen. You may need to give warning messages and write on their user talk pages for them to take notice. If you need to get more editors invoved, please use WT:INDIA. WP:CANVASSING editors like you did to me, won't help because the other editors won't generally listen to a canvassed editor. And we can't edit the main page in any case, having been cavassed. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- That is because you forgot to tag the editor :-) And once you see that your content is being reverted it is better to pause before undoing the revert. Vikram 20:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Priya Ramani shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vikram 20:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- My suggestion is to close the 3RR complaint and discuss. Vikram 21:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
I read about canvassing now, okay. Sorry. I know about the notice board. TrangaBellam (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am closing the complaint. TrangaBellam (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Cool! Thanks :-) BTW it might be better to make small changes to content rather than large ones. This way there is adequate scope for productive engagement. Vikram 05:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am closing the complaint. TrangaBellam (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Apologies
Sorry about that revert and warning. I had not fully caffeinated, and got your edit mixed up with that of Pakistan4ever. Possibly (talk) 19:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. No worries. Mistakes happen. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Audrey Truschke moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Audrey Truschke, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- HitroMilanese, I will be moving the article back. Why did you delete it without discussion? If you believe the article do not pass our notable policies, convince the community in an deletion discussion. Which information was unsourced? TrangaBellam (talk) 07:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- WP:NAUTHOR, WP:NPROF TrangaBellam (talk) 07:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi there, the article is moved to draftspace so that you may demonstrate notability per WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF. The current version is not suitable for mainspace as notability has not been demonstrated. Draftspace gives you opportunity to improve the article, but if you move it back to mainspace then I will have to take it to AfD where it is likely to be deleted. Thanks. Hitro talk 07:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- User:HitroMilanese if you wish, take it to AfD. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- I guess you don't understand how Wikipedia works. There is difference between draftifying and deletion. The purpose of draftifying the articles is making them suitable for mainspace after required improvements. You improved a one-liner unsuitable stub within 58 minutes of draftifying. Great. See WP:NPPDRAFT. If it meant for AfD, I would have taken it on sight. Hitro talk 09:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- User:HitroMilanese if you wish, take it to AfD. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
TrangaBellam, HitroMilanese is a new page reviewer, and as such they would be experienced in deciding whether new pages qualify. Edit warring with them would not be a good practice. Rather, find out what is needed to make it a viable page and see if you can make it so. Is the author notable for anything other than the one book we are aware of? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- User:Kautilya3, I did not edit war and I am prepared to defend it at a deletion discussion. Have you checked the article? She has two works with multiple reviews. And, she won the John F. Richards Prize in South Asian History by AHA, a very reputed body. Also, her work on Aurangzeb is the poorest. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Things to watch
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22Hindu+Holocaust%22&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=1&ns0=1
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22Hindu+Genocide%22&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&fulltext=1&ns0=1
- Stop receiving emails every-time I am pinged or thanked.
- (talk page stalker) See Preferences --> Notifications. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- thanks, kautilya3. solved! TrangaBellam (talk) 08:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) See Preferences --> Notifications. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks anyway for adding all this excellent content about the pre-Muslim dynasties of Kashmir, which were in great need of such attention. I didn't even suspect there was so much about them. That's great! पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC) |
- That is nice. Congratulations TrangaBellam! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! TrangaBellam (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Rewrites
- Symptoms of COVID-19
- COVID-19 drug repurposing research
- Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
- List of Manipuri kings
- Template:rp TrangaBellam (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Sylheti language
Please do not revert without discussing this. Chaipau (talk) 17:37, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
I declined the prod. It's best to take this one to AFD for deletion input from the wider community. Best.4meter4 (talk) 14:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
For your reading pleasure
Comes with a cute edit summary as well. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- LOL. Quora would have appreciated his efforts better. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:41, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from Turkmenportal, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!--Tautomers(T C) 04:49, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Welcome
redacted ds-alert message as I did not realize it was given before. LukeEmily (talk) 03:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- I have been notified less than a year ago. The relevant policy notes,
Editors issuing alerts are expected to ensure that no editor receives more than one alert per area of conflict per year. Any editor who issues alerts disruptively may be sanctioned.
Please be cautious. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Bhonsale - warning - deletion of sources and quotes
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bhonsale, you may be blocked from editing. .LukeEmily (talk) 15:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Rathore deletion of sourced content
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rathore, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.
- @LukeEmily: If I see you abusing templates once again, I will be asking for a topic-ban. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Go ahead please, ask for a topic ban on me right now. You have been abusing caste pages and several users have been warning you. I will be asking for a topic ban shortly and will be reporting you to admins. Intentional deletion of sourced content is not acceptable.LukeEmily (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:46, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Go ahead please, ask for a topic ban on me right now. You have been abusing caste pages and several users have been warning you. I will be asking for a topic ban shortly and will be reporting you to admins. Intentional deletion of sourced content is not acceptable.LukeEmily (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
OUP
FYI: Wikipedia_talk:The_Wikipedia_Library#Oxford_bibliographies. –Austronesier (talk) 09:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar!
Glad you found the discussion amusing. Tewdar (talk) 20:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Notification of discretionary sanctions concerning COVID-19
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in and edits about COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- Your edits/content removal from ZyCoV-D are clearly covered by discretionary sanctions concerning COVID-19. They are not a part of WP:NOTNEWS here. They are compiled as per recommended structure followed for COVID-19 vaccines articles. Run n Fly (talk) 10:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)