Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Toa Nidhiki05/Archive 15) (bot |
Thenightaway (talk | contribs) →Stalking: new section |
||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
Think I've addressed everything you brought up in the GAN. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 03:09, 2 June 2019 (UTC) |
Think I've addressed everything you brought up in the GAN. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 03:09, 2 June 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Stalking == |
|||
Please stop stalking me and reverting whatever I add. In this instance[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009&diff=900269473&oldid=900135149], you removed peer-reviewed academic publications and expert assessments. You were warned about this in April 2019[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Toa_Nidhiki05&diff=890824757&oldid=890405040]. [[User:Snooganssnoogans|Snooganssnoogans]] ([[User talk:Snooganssnoogans|talk]]) 14:51, 4 June 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:51, 4 June 2019
|
||||||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
WikiCup 2018 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Courcelles (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 147 GAs, 111 GARs, 9 DYKs, 4 FLs and 1 ITN. Our finalists were as follows:
- Courcelles (submissions)
- Kosack (submissions)
- Kees08 (submissions)
- SounderBruce (submissions)
- Cas Liber (submissions)
- Nova Crystallis (submissions)
- Iazyges (submissions)
- Ceranthor (submissions)
All those who reached the final win awards, and awards will also be going to the following participants:
- Cas Liber (submissions) wins the FA prize, for three featured articles in round 2.
- Courcelles (submissions) wins the GA prize, for 92 good articles in round 3.
- Kosack (submissions) wins the FL prize, for five featured lists overall.
- Cartoon network freak (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 30 articles in good topics overall.
- Usernameunique (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 24 did you know articles in round 3.
- Zanhe (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 17 in the news articles overall.
- Aoba47 (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 43 good article reviews in round 1.
Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition.
Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2019 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email) and Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email).
Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 --MrClog (talk) 20:31, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
MercyMe sales changes
I noticed that you were updating the sales figures, but the links to RIAA are broken. Could you please update them while you're making the other changes? Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:38, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Sure thing, I'll go ahead and fix the dead links on all the pages I can. I've been going to back to some of the older articles I've done and finally prepping them for FAC, so this is a good start. Toa Nidhiki05 21:42, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
MOS:NUMERO
Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style where it states, "style and formatting should be consistent within an article. Where more than one style is acceptable under MoS, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a good reason." Some articles use No. and other use number. Both are acceptable. Changing because some other article uses a different format is not a good reason as some articles use this format. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:13, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- If it's worth anything to you, and I'm not sure why you care so much, I'm the one who originally brought that article to GA. I don't think anyone else has really made any contributions since, so it's not really a big deal. Toa Nidhiki05 23:14, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For choosing to edit in places that are contentious, while maintaining your composure, and seeking the betterment of the overall project by ensuring neutrality of politically sensitive articles, I hereby present to you this barnstar. May it strengthen your resolve to continue to contribute in those difficult areas, where others may fear to tread. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 21:21, 25 May 2019 (UTC) |
Why did you web.archive.org every single source on Tracy Lawrence? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- To prevent link rot. I was going to look at reviewing it later if I had time (saw your message on WikiProject Albums) but figured regardless that having every link checked and archived ahead of time would be helpful. Toa Nidhiki05 20:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Seems like overkill to wayback EVERY link though, doesn't it? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Not really, there’s even an automated tool for it on the history page (“Fix dead links”).. I’ve been going back to modify some of my old GAs from six years ago and there were a fair number of dead links - some of which don’t have suitable replacements. It’s the best way to make sure the references stay functional forever, especially for a GA or FA - better fixing now than later, right? Toa Nidhiki05 21:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Seems like overkill to wayback EVERY link though, doesn't it? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2019
- From the editors: Picture that
- News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections
- In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball
- Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead
- Technology report: Lots of Bots
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey
- Essay: Paid editing
- From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?
Tracy again
Think I've addressed everything you brought up in the GAN. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:09, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Stalking
Please stop stalking me and reverting whatever I add. In this instance[1], you removed peer-reviewed academic publications and expert assessments. You were warned about this in April 2019[2]. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:51, 4 June 2019 (UTC)