AndrewPeterT (talk | contribs) →Thanks and formal apology: new section Tag: New topic |
Tim O'Doherty (talk | contribs) →Thanks and formal apology: Reply Tag: Reply |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
'''''[[User:AndrewPeterT|AndrewPeterT]] ([[User talk:AndrewPeterT|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/AndrewPeterT|contribs]])''''' 23:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC) |
'''''[[User:AndrewPeterT|AndrewPeterT]] ([[User talk:AndrewPeterT|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/AndrewPeterT|contribs]])''''' 23:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
:@[[User:AndrewPeterT|AndrewPeterT]] - It's alright Andrew, no need to apologise. You were doing what you thought right and you should have a clear conscience. Just read up on policy a bit: [[WP:RMCI]] is a good essay. You've wronged neither me nor GoodDay, and I've always liked your conversations. I'm going to step back a bit from BritRoy titling debates; will still participate in RMs, but not in the full RfC/policy-making stuff. Cheers, [[User:Tim O'Doherty|Tim O'Doherty]] ([[User talk:Tim O'Doherty#top|talk]]) 23:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:56, 25 November 2023
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
Fantastic user page! Absolutely spot on. ——Serial 11:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC) |
- @Serial - Thanks! Had some time to spare, so instead of being productive decided to mess around on WP. Hopefully a few of them made someone laugh; reckon Private Eye will be good this week. Hopefully don't get sanctioned by ArbCom for some of my Suella jokes either. Cheers — Tim O'Doherty (talk) 15:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- The latest outing is great :) "Suella Leatherapron"! ——Serial 21:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Serial Number 54129 - Ha ha (though, as we're on the subject of Braverman, I should say "haw haw"). Tim O'Doherty (talk) 21:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- The latest outing is great :) "Suella Leatherapron"! ——Serial 21:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
GA Reviews
Hello @Tim O'Doherty glad that you passed William, Prince of Wales as GA. That's one more feather in your hat. Now please one humble request from my end. Though you might find it difficult, please take up Catherine's article from the GA Noticeboard for review. No hurries but please take it up. Time will be at your discretion. Regards MSincccc (talk) 16:43, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- @MSincccc - OK. If you really don't mind about the timing, I will. It will probably be a few weeks from now until completion, though. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Tim O'Doherty Thanks by the way. Also including Keivan.f. He'll prove to be a valuable asset (I suppose) MSincccc (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Glad William's article has now been passed as GA. It doesn't really matter that it takes time to complete each review as long as the job is done properly. MSincccc has already nominated Catherine's page and I will play my part in bringing it to GA status. I have two more pages on mind that I think could possibly meet the GA criteria and I hope we can wrap them all up by the end of this year or perhaps early next year. Keivan.fTalk 20:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Just giving you a heads up regarding Catherine's page because our long comments have turned the review box into a mess. I did make some changes, followed by further modifications by MSincccc and the page has now a score of 35.9% (i.e. "Violation Unlikely"); I think that's even lower than William's article. Feel free to run it again, but I think technically it no longer fails the plagiarism aspect of the GA sets of criteria. Cheers. Keivan.fTalk 12:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Informal meetings
Don't know where you are located, but if you are in, or in convenient reach of, London, various Wikipedians gather from time to time at my flat in Islington or at a favoured pub in King's Cross station. If you might like to join us do email me. Tim riley talk 23:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Extremely kind of you to think of me Tim: unfortunately, I live right up in the north, and haven't ever really properly visited London itself, save for travelling through it and doing some buro stuff. But I thank you for your warm hospitality and am delighted you'd think of me as a someone good enough to socialise with. Best, Tim O'Doherty (talk) 07:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Very wise Tim. The Riley's is actually a well-known place of pilgrimage for all those who suffer from a sound liver and steady legs. It is believed by the faithful that at the solstice, in only a matter of hours, these afflictions can be cured, and one will leave with glow-in-the-dark internals and legs that—having given up their association with the body—find their own way home :) ——Serial 18:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Question
Hello Tim O’Doherty, I have seen that some of my edits have been removed because it is not cited. Please help me out with this and how do I cite sources? Danjwilkie (talk) 12:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Danjwilkie - Hi Daniel, it depends on the type of source. Which one are you citing? Tim O'Doherty (talk) 15:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:Charles III task force
Template:Charles III task force has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject British Royalty. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 11:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Thanks and formal apology
Dear Tim O'Doherty,
Thank you for undoing my inappropriate RM closure. And I also would like to sincerely apologize to you for my actions today. I should not have written that message on GoodDay's talk page and pinged you or GoodDay. And I also apologize that you became unnecessarily involved in all of this. I genuinely hope that we can have better conversations moving forward.
Sincerely,
AndrewPeterT (talk) (contribs) 23:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @AndrewPeterT - It's alright Andrew, no need to apologise. You were doing what you thought right and you should have a clear conscience. Just read up on policy a bit: WP:RMCI is a good essay. You've wronged neither me nor GoodDay, and I've always liked your conversations. I'm going to step back a bit from BritRoy titling debates; will still participate in RMs, but not in the full RfC/policy-making stuff. Cheers, Tim O'Doherty (talk) 23:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)