No edit summary |
Rich Farmbrough (talk | contribs) →The tool discussed on IRC: cardinals |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
== The tool discussed on [[IRC]] == |
== The tool discussed on [[IRC]] == |
||
I thought I would let you know, I've posted the motivation and purpose statement for [[User:Shirik/CollabRC|CollabRC]] (tenatively-named), the tool I was discussing in IRC a few days ago that I would like to develop to improve the capabilities of [[WP:Rollback|rollbackers]] on Wikipedia. I thought you might be interested in it and wanted to invite you personally to look it over and let me know if you have any specific features or criticisms that may be constructive for the project. I hope you don't feel this is inappropriate [[WP:CANVAS|canvassing]]; I just respect you and figured you might want to get a better idea of where I am going, and I value your input. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns, or if you have any comments regarding the project itself, feel free to bring it up on the talk page there. Thanks! --[[User:Shirik|Shirik]] ([[User talk:Shirik|talk]]) 06:15, |
I thought I would let you know, I've posted the motivation and purpose statement for [[User:Shirik/CollabRC|CollabRC]] (tenatively-named), the tool I was discussing in IRC a few days ago that I would like to develop to improve the capabilities of [[WP:Rollback|rollbackers]] on Wikipedia. I thought you might be interested in it and wanted to invite you personally to look it over and let me know if you have any specific features or criticisms that may be constructive for the project. I hope you don't feel this is inappropriate [[WP:CANVAS|canvassing]]; I just respect you and figured you might want to get a better idea of where I am going, and I value your input. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns, or if you have any comments regarding the project itself, feel free to bring it up on the talk page there. Thanks! --[[User:Shirik|Shirik]] ([[User talk:Shirik|talk]]) 06:15, sixteen December 2009 (UTC) |
||
{{Talkback|User_talk:Shirik/CollabRC#Sample sets}} [[User:Shirik|Shirik]] ([[User talk:Shirik|talk]]) 18:20, |
{{Talkback|User_talk:Shirik/CollabRC#Sample sets}} [[User:Shirik|Shirik]] ([[User talk:Shirik|talk]]) 18:20, eighteen December 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Database dumps== |
|||
The way to process these is by scanning them which is actually pretty quick. The articles "only" dump takes between eight minutes and an hour, depending on what I am doing with it - probably it could be sped up more. I use perl, I can write a script in a few minutes from scratcch and if it is one I already have something similar, even quicker. For example I was trying to find a language stub I created, the following code listed all where I am the last editor. (Didn't actually find the stub, but that's another story.) |
|||
<pre> |
|||
while(<>){ |
|||
chomp; |
|||
if(/<title>(.*)<\/title>/){$title=$1;} |
|||
if(/<username>(.*)<\/username>/){ |
|||
if($1 eq "Rich Farmbrough"){ |
|||
$mine=1; |
|||
} |
|||
else {$mine=0;} |
|||
} |
|||
if ($mine ==1 && /lang-stub/){print "$title\n";} |
|||
} |
|||
</pre> |
Revision as of 10:53, 19 December 2009
Kambiz Roshan ravan
Mr Roshan Ravan is a renowned Iranian composer. I will rich this article soon. I urge you to refer to the Farsi version of the article in Persian Wikipedia service and observe the article. --Goodmanjoon (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Mediabizbloggers
Hello Tim1357, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Mediabizbloggers - a page you tagged - because: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW (Talk) 00:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Request for Reconsideration of Deletion / Canasta
Hello Tim -
I posted a request for reconsideration of deletion to Alphachimp on October 1st. I see that Alphachimp doesn't appear to be very active any longer.
Would you be able to help me with this request? Thanks -
Gouache23 (talk) 13:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
{{adminhelp}}
- Sure, the NPR source seems to bee good enough to assert notability. I ask the admin to unserfy the article in question, and Ill help the user get it ready to be moved to the main-space. thanks! Tim1357 (talk) 16:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- I have undeleted it to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Canasta (band). That gives you and Gouache23 a month to get it ready for the mainspace. This is a useful but fairly new idea: see Wikipedia:Article Incubator for details of how it works. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Daily FfD pages and this discussion
I haven't heard back from him. You asked me to let you know.--Rockfang (talk) 06:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Okey Dokey, Ill get to it this weekend. Would you want the bot to add a box to all the previous days? Or just start from current? Tim1357 (talk) 12:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
The tool discussed on IRC
I thought I would let you know, I've posted the motivation and purpose statement for CollabRC (tenatively-named), the tool I was discussing in IRC a few days ago that I would like to develop to improve the capabilities of rollbackers on Wikipedia. I thought you might be interested in it and wanted to invite you personally to look it over and let me know if you have any specific features or criticisms that may be constructive for the project. I hope you don't feel this is inappropriate canvassing; I just respect you and figured you might want to get a better idea of where I am going, and I value your input. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns, or if you have any comments regarding the project itself, feel free to bring it up on the talk page there. Thanks! --Shirik (talk) 06:15, sixteen December 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Shirik (talk) 18:20, eighteen December 2009 (UTC)
Database dumps
The way to process these is by scanning them which is actually pretty quick. The articles "only" dump takes between eight minutes and an hour, depending on what I am doing with it - probably it could be sped up more. I use perl, I can write a script in a few minutes from scratcch and if it is one I already have something similar, even quicker. For example I was trying to find a language stub I created, the following code listed all where I am the last editor. (Didn't actually find the stub, but that's another story.)
while(<>){ chomp; if(/<title>(.*)<\/title>/){$title=$1;} if(/<username>(.*)<\/username>/){ if($1 eq "Rich Farmbrough"){ $mine=1; } else {$mine=0;} } if ($mine ==1 && /lang-stub/){print "$title\n";} }