Binksternet (talk | contribs) →Disruptive editing at Detroit: new section |
Disruptive editing at Talk:Detroit |
||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Detroit&diff=next&oldid=566394940 This edit] of yours was knowingly performed against talk page consensus, as established at [[Talk:Detroit]] and [[Talk:Decline of Detroit]]. The material is valid and important. Your removal of it is tendentious and disruptive. Consider this a formal warning against edit warring and tendentious editing, per the guideline at [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing]]. If you continue to disrupt the article you will be blocked. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 15:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC) |
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Detroit&diff=next&oldid=566394940 This edit] of yours was knowingly performed against talk page consensus, as established at [[Talk:Detroit]] and [[Talk:Decline of Detroit]]. The material is valid and important. Your removal of it is tendentious and disruptive. Consider this a formal warning against edit warring and tendentious editing, per the guideline at [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing]]. If you continue to disrupt the article you will be blocked. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 15:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
==Disruptive editing at [[Talk:Detroit]]== |
|||
Thomas Paine1776, you need to post much more concisely, relevantly, and responsively on [[Talk:Detroit]]. Please stop copypasting bits of your own previous arguments to bloat up your posts. If you continue to [[WP:OWN]] the page by mere force of repetition, irrelevance, and wordiness, I'm going to [[WP:block|block]] you for talkpage [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruption]] and violation of [[WP:BATTLE]]. Specifically, if you paste the phrase {{tq|"your sources to [''sic, every time''] not prove your assertions. They amount to [[WP:Fancruft]] and [[WP:Coatrack]], and [[WP:Soap]]. Wikipedia is not obligated to include editorial bias"}} again. Or {{tq|"Agree with Lance, the section lacks neutrality/balance."}} Also, you may be blocked if you continue to make [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]], such as randomly accusing editors of being sockpuppets. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 21:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC). |
Revision as of 21:37, 30 July 2013
Welcome
Hello, Thomas Paine1776, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
Thanks
Appreciate the Barnstar!Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 22:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
WP:CHICAGO
You have been not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO, but you have made at least 25 edits to Chicago. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Atlanta, Georgia
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For a great deal of helpful cleanups and edits to geography articles including Atlanta, Georgia among others. Todd Vierling (talk) 19:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks a bunch!!!Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 21:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Detroit sources
Thank you for sourcing the article :) WhisperToMe (talk) 16:18, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the barnstar!Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Happy Thomas Paine1776's Day!
User:Thomas Paine1776 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
First edit of 2011
Random comment: I am a member of the central time zone, where 2011 has just begun about an hour ago. I was curious, so I looked at Wikipedia's recent changes to see the first edit of the year, and it turns out this edit by you is the first one! It appears from your editing interests that you are also a member of the central time zone, so congratulations on bringing the award home. Happy new year! Hope it's a great one!--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 07:06, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note, nice homepage. That was eastern time though. Happy New Year. Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 20:25, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
FYI
I just blocked ThomasPaine1776isaDick (talk · contribs). Thought you might like to know. --Closedmouth (talk) 08:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Disruptive editing at Detroit
This edit of yours was knowingly performed against talk page consensus, as established at Talk:Detroit and Talk:Decline of Detroit. The material is valid and important. Your removal of it is tendentious and disruptive. Consider this a formal warning against edit warring and tendentious editing, per the guideline at Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt the article you will be blocked. Binksternet (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Disruptive editing at Talk:Detroit
Thomas Paine1776, you need to post much more concisely, relevantly, and responsively on Talk:Detroit. Please stop copypasting bits of your own previous arguments to bloat up your posts. If you continue to WP:OWN the page by mere force of repetition, irrelevance, and wordiness, I'm going to block you for talkpage disruption and violation of WP:BATTLE. Specifically, if you paste the phrase "your sources to [sic, every time] not prove your assertions. They amount to WP:Fancruft and WP:Coatrack, and WP:Soap. Wikipedia is not obligated to include editorial bias"
again. Or "Agree with Lance, the section lacks neutrality/balance."
Also, you may be blocked if you continue to make personal attacks, such as randomly accusing editors of being sockpuppets. Bishonen | talk 21:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC).