ThereWillBeTime (talk | contribs) |
173.88.250.97 (talk) Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Hey, thank you for coming to me for my explanation, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]]. |
:Hey, thank you for coming to me for my explanation, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]]. |
||
:I'll of course defer to your judgement on this matter. But just summarizing my experience of this situation; there was what I saw to be a section in an article presenting a large amount of undue weight to a subject. I edited this section and opened up discussion about the section on the article's talk page. Another editor joined the discussion, which turned into an unproductive edit-war esque situation. An admin stepped in, you, protected the page, and told us, the editors, to discuss this issue on the talk page, and advised to seek resolution using other procedures if one could not be reached. This discussion was happening, changes and compromise edits had been made, and then a third editor who wasn't even aware of the discussion, or a participant in it, came, wiped out these edits, and restored the previously disputed content. |
:I'll of course defer to your judgement on this matter. But just summarizing my experience of this situation; there was what I saw to be a section in an article presenting a large amount of undue weight to a subject. I edited this section and opened up discussion about the section on the article's talk page. Another editor joined the discussion, which turned into an unproductive edit-war esque situation. An admin stepped in, you, protected the page, and told us, the editors, to discuss this issue on the talk page, and advised to seek resolution using other procedures if one could not be reached. This discussion was happening, changes and compromise edits had been made by myself and the other editor who had discussed the issue, and then a third editor who wasn't even aware of the discussion, or a participant in it, came, wiped out these edits, and restored the previously disputed content. |
||
:To that end. I feel I should not be blocked because I do not feel that I am continuing this war. I feel as though the third editor who came in and restored the content without even reviewing the discussion surrounding it on the talk page was irresponsible with their edit. I am hoping to have a discussion about it with other editor's, and if no consensus can be reached there, I would hope to follow through with other [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution options.]][[User:ThereWillBeTime|ThereWillBeTime]] ([[User talk:ThereWillBeTime#top|talk]]) 05:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC) |
:To that end. I feel I should not be blocked because I do not feel that I am continuing this war. I feel as though the third editor who came in and restored the content without even reviewing the discussion surrounding it on the talk page was irresponsible with their edit. I am hoping to have a discussion about it with other editor's, and if no consensus can be reached there, I would hope to follow through with other [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution options.]][[User:ThereWillBeTime|ThereWillBeTime]] ([[User talk:ThereWillBeTime#top|talk]]) 05:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:28, 18 January 2021
Archives
|
Season of the Witch (song)
I have made my contribution about the proposed changes to the song on its talk page and that discussion should start there. What I wanted to bring here was a discussion about your actions. I did not know about the talk page discussion, so it would have been more helpful to point that out to me on my talk page instead of through an edit summary, especially when your reversion went against WP:BRD with an ongoing discussion. Your edits in relation to this song are WP:Edit warring, which already got the article protected from editing. Your adding back the orphaned fair use template to the file, [1], was incorrect and could also be seen as edit warring, trying to get the file deleted. Once a file is no longer orphaned, the process starts over again and a new seven day template could have been put in starting January 17 or you could have let the bot tag it like it did the last time. Aspects (talk) 23:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Understood. I guess, in that same sense. It perhaps would have been more helpful for you to review the edits and the discussion on the talk page before restoring an entire section.ThereWillBeTime (talk) 23:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Complaint about you on my talk page
See User talk:EdJohnston#Season of the Witch (song) where User:Aspects has complained about the continuing war on this article. Since you continued to revert after protection expired, with no evidence (that I can see) of any agreement reached on talk, please explain why you shouldn't be blocked for continuing the war. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 05:18, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hey, thank you for coming to me for my explanation, EdJohnston.
- I'll of course defer to your judgement on this matter. But just summarizing my experience of this situation; there was what I saw to be a section in an article presenting a large amount of undue weight to a subject. I edited this section and opened up discussion about the section on the article's talk page. Another editor joined the discussion, which turned into an unproductive edit-war esque situation. An admin stepped in, you, protected the page, and told us, the editors, to discuss this issue on the talk page, and advised to seek resolution using other procedures if one could not be reached. This discussion was happening, changes and compromise edits had been made by myself and the other editor who had discussed the issue, and then a third editor who wasn't even aware of the discussion, or a participant in it, came, wiped out these edits, and restored the previously disputed content.
- To that end. I feel I should not be blocked because I do not feel that I am continuing this war. I feel as though the third editor who came in and restored the content without even reviewing the discussion surrounding it on the talk page was irresponsible with their edit. I am hoping to have a discussion about it with other editor's, and if no consensus can be reached there, I would hope to follow through with other wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution options.ThereWillBeTime (talk) 05:48, 18 January 2021 (UTC)