→Wikipedia:Peer review for Pope John Paul II: corrected to Theologiae ;-) |
|||
Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
==Wikipedia:Peer review for [[Pope John Paul II]]== |
==Wikipedia:Peer review for [[Pope John Paul II]]== |
||
Hi |
Hi Theologiae, I was wondering whether you'd be interested in doing a [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Pope John Paul II/archive3|peer review]], |
||
or if you had any comments on this article? |
or if you had any comments on this article? |
||
Revision as of 21:29, 28 January 2012
SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.
Farewell for nowI just wanted to wish you well. If you don't feel safe, then you're quite right that this isn't the best place for you right now. Maybe you'll feel like contributing again when you get a little older. If you do, you have the option of coming back to this account or of starting a new one. We call that getting a "clean start", and it's pretty easy. All you have to do is create a new account and start using it. If you do it anytime soon, you do want to be careful not to edit the same articles that you were, especially if it might look like you're being sneaky and trying to pretend to be a new person. If you do start a new account, you should let this one stay retired. And if you ever decide you want to be an administrator or something under your new account, be sure to let arbcom know who you were. That way if somebody finds out later and accuses you of sock puppetry, you can prove that you weren't trying to hide anything. Good luck! :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
re: your messagesHi Theologiae, I've left replies to your messages here and here -- Marek.69 talk 21:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC) re: your messageHi Theologiae, I’ve replied here. Cheers, Ian Spackman (talk) 04:37, 18 April 2010 (UTC) Hi Theologiae, I've left you another reply here -- Marek.69 talk 16:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC) We will not miss youTo be honest, after a check I gave on your "masterwork" at Royal Palace of Milan, an automatic translation from the Italian article in which, among the other pearls, Sforza had become "effort", I can tell that we will not be missing you as a Wikipedian... --'''Attilios''' (talk) 23:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
re: your messageHi Theologiae, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 talk 17:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC) Barnstar
Bedtime StoryHi Theologiae, how are you? Well I don't really do reviews, I think I never have reviewed an article, but I guess I can give you some feedback.
There have to be some things I am forgetting, but as I said before I haven't reviewed articles, you probably should ask Legolas for input, he is the one that is the most active on the Madonna project, I only did a couple of her songs that I like from her True Blue album back in 2009, when the Madonna wikiproject wasn't even created and no one was really improving her articles. I only did "Papa Don't Preach", "Live to Tell" and "True Blue", which were I think the first good articles of Madonna's songs, but since then a lot have been enhaced and the formats have changed, so Im not really familiar with the style the current Madonna articles use. Let me know if you need more help. Regards. Frcm1988 (talk) 19:18, 18 October 2011 (UTC) TalkbackHello, Theologiae. You have new messages at Wikipedian Penguin's talk page.
Message added 19:59, 25 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 19:59, 25 October 2011 (UTC) re: your messageHi Theologiae, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 talk 15:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC) New Wave Music ArticleNice job with the lead. It both flows better and better summarizes the what is detailed below. Edkollin (talk) 22:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC) Ray of LightHello, Theologiae. As you are a part of WP:MADONNA, I guess you are interested to help here. Per discussion on its talkpage, this masterpiece really needs some works to keep its GA status. Thanks :) Bluesatellite (talk) 13:09, 1 November 2011 (UTC) The Wagner article is in need of some helpWe're in a bit of a pickle in the Wagner discussion page. The issues concerns what can be in the introduction and what not, should it be shortened and are the chapters in the right order? At the Wagner discussion page there is Edit War solution topic and at the end of it some courses of action that I was requested to list. Please help, it seems that the few old hags (me included) don't want to come to any conclusion. Just take a fast look. Thank you User:Major Torp (talk) 14:24, 7 November 2011 (UTC) Dear TheologiaeDear Theologiae, I don't really know what to say, just thank you. I'm very happy and grateful for what you wrote. But as you can see, I don't give any importance to my user page. I've always contribuited with the only objective to improve the image of Italy, and if I can do it, that's my reward. But when someone appreciate your work, it's always nice. As you reminded, when firstly I arrived here, all the articles about Italy lied in state of neglect, so I just tried to fix the most important articles. After some years of work starting from virtually zero, I confess that I had been a little upset by your large edits, but anyway I knew that they were done in good faith and that was a useful lesson to cope with new editors. So thank you for everything and let's keep on working! --Conte di Cavour (talk) 22:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC) technoyou added: "Techno music is generally characterised by highly repetitive, 4/4 rhythm tracks, making strong usage of synthesizers and drum machines. It generally follows a minimalist and percussion-based aesthetic, and in many cases, it also abandons the traditional harmonic structure of Western music." am familiar with the the main text you are pointing to as i placed it there. issues with the phrases "rhythm tracks," "highly repetitive," and "minimalist," the latter two are in particular not accurate, and are context specific. i feel the main body content could be summarized more precisely, and without using terms such as "highly repetitive" and "minimalist." -- Semitransgenic talk. 14:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notificationHi. In Bedtime Story (Madonna song), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 17 December 2011 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Rococo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decoration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 24 December 2011 (UTC) A bowl of strawberries for you!Thanks for your xmas greeting, Theologiae! I seem to have run out cards – and you probably don’t want any left-over plum pudding – so how about some fresh strawberries? Cheers, Ian Spackman (talk) 08:00, 27 December 2011 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Culture of Milan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Second city (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 31 December 2011 (UTC) Project Rome Re-launchHello, As the project coordinator and manager I am re-launching Wikipedia Project Rome. The new scope of the project is the city, Kingdom, Republic, Empire and it's influence on the entire world we know today. The current project emphasis is on the fall of the Republic and bringing these articles to GA! Please let your friends and associate know about this projects new scope! Project Rome coordinator, User:Amadscientist--Amadscientist (talk) 00:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Charade (1963 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time Out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC) Wikipedia:Peer review for Pope John Paul IIHi Theologiae, I was wondering whether you'd be interested in doing a peer review, or if you had any comments on this article? Best Regards |