→September 2018: Explantion and asking for fairness Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
A slithy tove (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:T. Eliot de Gagne|T. Eliot de Gagne]]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/Theboo77|your recent contributions]] to [[:People's Alliance of New Brunswick]] have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox|Advertising]] and using Wikipedia as a "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion|soapbox]]" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a [[WP:NPOV|neutral perspective]]. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.[[Category:User talk pages with Uw-advert1 notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-advert1 --> |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:T. Eliot de Gagne|T. Eliot de Gagne]]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of [[Special:Contributions/Theboo77|your recent contributions]] to [[:People's Alliance of New Brunswick]] have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox|Advertising]] and using Wikipedia as a "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion|soapbox]]" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a [[WP:NPOV|neutral perspective]]. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.[[Category:User talk pages with Uw-advert1 notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-advert1 --> |
||
== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion == |
|||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:A slithy tove|A slithy tove]] ([[User talk:A slithy tove|talk]]) 11:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:08, 24 September 2018
February 2018
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that you made a change to an article, People's Alliance of New Brunswick, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:16, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pipicacalol69 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
![Stop icon with clock](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Pipicacalol69 (talk) 14:03, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Warring?
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Theboo77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I updated the information, as I was asked to by the political party involved. Other rival parties have been taking done updates and added their own unfavorable information from former members who were expelled for misrepresenting party policies on social media. The upset individuals made up a story and a local paper ran the story which this rival party continues to add. Iwas asked to re-add my contribution with citations from wikipedia. I complied and added the references requested however now I am blocked? Theboo77 (talk) 17:13, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This was totally inappropriate and a violation of WP:COI and WP:PAID. Once your block expires, please make sure you declare your conflict of interest and carefully read the policies so you can avoid such inappropriate edits in the future. Yamla (talk) 14:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock
My apologies, I was not ignoring the talk function I just never knew it existed. I do not work for the party, only asked if I could update history as it hasnt for awhile. I do not intend to promote the party, only add additional history as the last piece of history was back in 2014. Four years have passed, many things change. The leader has been holding town halls the past 3 years, which is a part of history. Ive added links to the edits I have made, which were requested. I will add what conflict of interest if necessary, however I am not a member of said party or work for them in any other way. Theboo77 (talk) 14:38, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Since you have said that you are editing the page at the party's request, you are effectively representing them since they are directing you on what edits to make. I strongly advise you to restrict your contributions to the talk page, and as well place the {{UserboxCOI}} template on your userpage (User:Theboo77).
- Also note that the party has no right of ownership or editorial control over the article. Wikipedia is uninterested in what the party wants to say about itself or how it wishes to be portrayed. Only previously published information from reliable sources that are independent of the subject will be considered valid. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
They party did not tell me what to write. I had a friend of mine mention the wikipedia page history has not had anything from the last 3 years as much had happened. I added three things, with links. I guess they will have to hope someone updates their recent history for them.
March 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to People's Alliance of New Brunswick, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 14:07, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- The content that you removed had 8 citations, so the claim in your edit summary does not seem justified. Given your recent block, I suggest you be very careful when editing this article. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. A slithy tove (talk) 18:07, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. A slithy tove (talk) 19:52, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
Please be aware that there are politcal rivals editing the peoples alliance of new brunswick wikipage. I only wish to edit the page to keep it factual and on topic of the party. Upon reading and editing other political parties, I have noticed that any type of negative history or controversies is absent. Which is fair. However, editing to add any type of negative things possible continue to happen over and over again to this one particular party which seems to be allowed by one user in particular who is in conflict of interest as they are a known supporter of a rival political party (there are 6 in New Brunswick). Wiki should be a neutral site to read on specifics. If wiki begins to allow rivals to go onto other parties pages and add negative stuff, or allow that, it would really weaken the content. I could go to all 5 other party pages and add every controversy each party has ever faced but how would that make wiki better? Furthermore, it is evident changes are being made to weaken this partys public position, for example, when I add updates polling and add the link as a citation, this user deletes it and adds an earlier poll with a lesser percentage. This clearly shows the user is in a conflict of interest. Can this editing war started by this user please stop? Or if not, then please allow me to update all parties with their contraversial information for which I will add legit links.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kendall-K1 (talk) 03:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at People's Alliance of New Brunswick, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.
Hello, I'm T. Eliot de Gagne. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to People's Alliance of New Brunswick have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. A slithy tove (talk) 11:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)