TheGracefulSlick (talk | contribs) Reverted, done. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
==Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2017_December_28#Peter_Hood_Ballantine_Cumming]]== |
==Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2017_December_28#Peter_Hood_Ballantine_Cumming]]== |
||
[[File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]] You are invited to join the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2017_December_28#Peter_Hood_Ballantine_Cumming]]. [[User:Rusf10|Rusf10]] ([[User talk:Rusf10|talk]]) 00:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC){{Z48}}<!-- [[Template:Please see]] --> |
[[File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]] You are invited to join the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2017_December_28#Peter_Hood_Ballantine_Cumming]]. [[User:Rusf10|Rusf10]] ([[User talk:Rusf10|talk]]) 00:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC){{Z48}}<!-- [[Template:Please see]] --> |
||
==1RR violation== |
|||
Please note, that you violated 1RR with these two - [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ahd_Tamimi&diff=817582979&oldid=817581753] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ahd_Tamimi&diff=817560020&oldid=817557151] - specifically the "original author" clause. It is also POVish and contains factual errors: |
|||
# You know he was shot, you don't know it was a soldier who shot him - at the very least this is shot, allegedly by an Israeli soldier. |
|||
# She didn't know he was in intensive care at the time. |
|||
# It is her '''claim''' that this is in response to that. It needs to be qualified (even if probably true). |
|||
# You don't mention the cousin was involved in clashes with the soliders - this didn't come out of the blue. |
|||
# use of POVish sources from one side in exclusion to others. |
|||
# She didn't slap a "security officer" (a low paid person at the mall) - she slapped an officer (in this case - a Captain in the IDF). |
|||
I respectfully ask you self-revert due to breaking 1RR.[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 09:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:{{u|Icewhiz}} unfortunately the second diff you provided is an independent edit meant to expand the article, not a revert of your, or anyone else's edit. The first diff, yes, is a revert but that unfortunately does not violate 1RR as of yet. So please can you elaborate further on how I violated 1RR?[[User:TheGracefulSlick|TheGracefulSlick]] ([[User talk:TheGracefulSlick#top|talk]]) 09:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
::{{u|Icewhiz}} ehh nevermind. I'll revert since I'll be expanding the article anyways. That takes a few days, however.[[User:TheGracefulSlick|TheGracefulSlick]] ([[User talk:TheGracefulSlick#top|talk]]) 09:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
::: {{ec}} Certainly, per ARBPIA snactions: {{tq|"If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours of the revert."}}. You are the author of the second diff. I performed an action that is a partial revert of your content - and you reverted me (diff1) back to the version you originally authored. This is a clear cut "original author" vio (you would also be potentially in violation if diff1 was a partial revert - but here it is a clear cut "original author" and revert back to that state. Regardless of the 1RR issue - even if you disagree with some of what I did - some of it was an improvement - I didn't fully revert you (e.g. I think the rubber bullet to the cousin is relevant), you don't have to fully revert even if you disagree on some aspects.[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 09:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:22, 29 December 2017
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hello, welcome to my talk page brothers and sisters, please comment below if you want to discuss anything!
Zachary Taylor: I have requested feedback
TheGracefulSlick recently accepted an edit to remove two sentences from Zachary Taylor. There is a section on that article's talk page where I requested feedback on the potential of that edit to be WP:GOOD. Please address the issue in section "168 years" before reverting the edit again, thanks. - Sleyece 17:43:02, July 3, 2017 (UTC)
The Good Article Nominations Page Needs Your Help!
Hi there. You nominated an article for evaluation against the good article criteria some time ago, but I noticed you have yet to review an article yourself. Although it's not mandatory, it would be helpful if every user who creates a nomination also reviewed at least one other article, as this would help clear the massive backlog. Reviewing someone else's article can also help you in the long run: every article reviewed brings yours one position closer to the top of the nominations list! If you worked on the article you nominated, chances are you're already familiar with the six good article criteria. It really isn't hard to review, and may take an experienced editor only a few hours to complete. If you have the time and would like to help, please click here, take a moment to figure out which article you'd like to review, then click on its (start review) button. Thank you for reading, and if you need assistance with your review at any point, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page and I'll respond to you as soon as I can. Homeostasis07 (talk) |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, TheGracefulSlick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Markelle Fultz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All-Pac-12 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Nighthawk
I have my suspicions that Nighthawk is a sockpuppet of another editor, who he sometimes follows into battle. Some of his reverts seem to be antagonistic. I'll keep an eye on what follows. Regards, WWGB (talk) 06:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
About Azerbaycan'ın geleneksel kıyafetleri - not a WP:G1 candidate, but pretty sure it's a copyvio
Hi Graceful,
I have declined the WP:G1 speedy deletion. It's in Azerbaijani. I immediately recoginised it was in that language from "Azerbaycan'ın" and the dotless i in the text... but I'm hellaciously nerdy about that sort of stuff, so don't worry too much about the speedy decline.
It does appear to meet the WP:G12 criterion, as a simple google search (same as what I found declining the WP:G1) finds a lotta websites with the same text. I guess I'm WP:INVOLVED now, so I'll leave it to you to it.
Pətər ın Australıa aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:35, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
A white rabbit for you!
A white rabbit for you! | |
I always see you around helping people out and saying the things I'd wish I'd said myself. Thank you for all your work. Adamfinmo (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC) |
Happy Holidays
Happy Holidays | |
Wishing you a happy holiday season! Times flies and 2018 is around the corner. Thank you for your contributions. ~ K.e.coffman (talk) 00:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC) |
Season's Greetings
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
DYK for J. P. Crawford
On 22 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article J. P. Crawford, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that J. P. Crawford was drafted by the Philadelphia Phillies major league baseball team with the expectation of eventually superseding Jimmy Rollins? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/J. P. Crawford. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, J. P. Crawford), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017 Melbourne car attack
I am in favor of talking about deletion before going through with it as this will get most editors on the same page. This event may very well be nothing but I feel we should give it the benefit of the doubt so future deletion rationales are stronger. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:22, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Knowledgekid87 I just needed to leave that AFD and cool off; it was clear no one is there to discuss notability. I do not approve of the "wait and see" tactic WP:RAPID uses, especially since we can apply it to any news story that garners coverage for a day. Wikipedia has notability guidelines for the present yet I'm being told time and time again they can be disregarded when the event is hot off the presses. And oddly, I only ever see RAPID applied when terrorism is in the conversation; however, an article like this, another recent event, is easily deleted within the same timeframe.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- An article isn't worth getting worked up about as sources and words can always be placed back in. I don't know how or why some articles are kept while others aren't, but to be honest I was irked in this case about a discussion being ignored for outright deletion. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Have a kitten, and happy holidays! =)
Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:39, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
Happy Holidays | |
From Stave one of Dickens A Christmas Carol So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~ MarnetteD|Talk 00:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC) |
YouWillRegret
If you can find a valid guideline on what constitutes a valid "claim" of notability, I'd be interested. I also think the article should be deleted, I'm merely extra obnoxious about speedy-deletion criteria. I found a credible "claim" of notability per an interpretation of NMUSIC #5. Most artists who appear on a label as significant as Republic I would presume to be notable, I find it odd that no suitable sources were found for this artist, the label must not believe in this artist much. As I have no interest in the genre, I wouldn't know where to begin to look for sources myself, mostly because I don't know which rap sources are hype, and which are reliable. There's certainly a lot out there. Anyway, I wanted to explain the decline since it may have caused you irritation. All the best, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- No, 78.26, I was not irritated. Your understanding of NMUSIC would apply to artists or ensembles but it makes no claims for their recordings. That is why we have WP:NALBUM. Anyhow, it is no biggie and I appreciate you sparing some time to explain your action.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- I agree, and I would certainly NOT make that argument at the AfD. If I could, I would delete the article as advertising, since it seems all the "sources" are to sites selling the album, but it doesn't quite qualify as G11 either in my estimation. I had not seen the AfD for the artist, no excuse as I probably should have. Odd in that discussion that no one mentioned sources in an attempt to meet NMUSIC #1. One would expect the usual wall of social media links. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:53, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I'm asking around whether people can do a grammar check/proofread/NPOV check on Beaumont children disappearance. If you could go over the article it would be good. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 13:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2017_December_28#Peter_Hood_Ballantine_Cumming. Rusf10 (talk) 00:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48