I apologize for not signing my post before. You have marked me down for vandalism, but I do not know on what. Please respond on my talk page with what I vandalized. [[User:Iankap99|Iankap99]] Iankap99 21:57, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
I apologize for not signing my post before. You have marked me down for vandalism, but I do not know on what. Please respond on my talk page with what I vandalized. [[User:Iankap99|Iankap99]] Iankap99 21:57, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
:: You're not the only one. He's also been vandalizing the Lady Gaga song articles too by changing the stage names to the real names. They used to be perfect, but because of him, they don't look the same. [[User:CharlieJS13|CharlieJS13]] ([[User talk:CharlieJS13|talk]] 18:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
=== Here ===
=== Here ===
Revision as of 17:39, 27 April 2010
Hello, Tbhotch! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! fetchcomms 04:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
52nd Grammy Awards
Why would we even think of removing the nominees that didn't win? That is a disservice not only to the still-honored singers, songwriters, etc., but to our readers. I understand that previous Grammys also do not show the nominees, but this must be changed. I have started a thread at Talk:52nd Grammy Awards. Thanks, Reywas92Talk 01:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DYK
Being curious I looked at a recently deleted DYK nomination, and it seems you posted a DYK nomination, but for the wrong thing. You listed the new article as Up (2009 film), while I think you meant to use Up (soundtrack). I was tempted to try and nominate Up (soundtrack) myself but it's too short: < 1000 characters of prose but it needs at least 1500. It also needs references for the 'thematic transformation' point, so would fail without some work to improve it.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 12:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free files in your userspace
Hey there, this is just a notification that I commented out the use of non-free files on your userpage. Per our restrictive non-free content criteria policy, non-free content must be used in very limited places—basically, it can only be used in article namespace. If you would like to list the files on your userpage, please place a colon before the beginning brackets and the file.
For example, placing the following on your userpage:
Thank you for understanding, and sorry for the inconvenience. — ξxplicit 04:39, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can I replace "file" with "image"? TbhotchTalk2 Me 05:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but there isn't a difference, though. — ξxplicit 05:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I've added a colon to these images so they don't display. Please remember that non-free images are not allowed in user space. — ξxplicit 20:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
laundry Service
My links are official! Sources: linklink And find the certifications. Are you blind??? Please, accept the truth. Genieofmusic (talk) 15:427, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
I have two sources, you have one. And I know Wikipedia does not accept the United World Chart, but you can: linkGenieofmusic (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have more sources and they are official. Stop vandalize the page, please. Genieofmusic (talk) 12:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Accept the facts. Check the certifications! And I have besides my BMI source, the source of Shakira's OFFICIAL site. You just have one. Deal with it. Genieofmusic (talk) 13:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Laundry Service sales have been discussed many times. Go to the discussion page , please. Thanks--Albes29 (talk) 11:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, la página de discusión de Laundry service si existe lo que pasa es que debe estar en los archivos y por eso no lo encuentras. Ese tema se ha discutido muchas veces y se ha llegado a la conclusión de que no se puede confiar mucho en las webs de los artistas pòrque tiende a inflar las ventas. es por eso que se confía más en el reporte de BMI que dice que las ventas de ese disco son 13 millones. Ahora no tengo mucho tiempo, pero mañana buscaré en los archivos la discusión sobre este tema. De momento creo que deberías dejar las ventas en 13 millones hasta que se discuta. alguien podría molestarse y decir que lo que haces es vandalismo. Gracias por tu mensaje, veo que hablas español. chao--Albes29 (talk) 23:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
Hey! I forgot to thank you a while back for reverting that bit of vandalism on my userpage a while back, so thank you! JujutacularT · C 22:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, I was lucky to find that vandalism, and help block that account TbhotchTalk2 Me 22:07, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are extremely rude. Do you do anything else with your life? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.20.53 (talk) 03:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you except sales numbers from usa today, then why not this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.20.53 (talk) 03:13, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
just FYI.. I opened a sock puppet investigation/check user on 118.90.20.53 plus another IP and one user that's always editing the Kelly Clarkson articles in the same mannor. the mentioned IP claiming to have edited before, when the history only goes back a couple of days is suspicious, but we'll know after the check. If you want to add any comments or proof you may have, here's the investiagtion: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kcfan90. The users have not been notified in case it comes out negative during the check, they may take it the wrong way when it's not a big deal if there's no sock puppet Alan - talk 03:59, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:I got you music video LL.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:I got you music video LL.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 03:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
KND
So you DON'T think the article is riddled with spelling mistakes and other errors? 76.226.96.194 (talk) 20:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, but I was trying to place it in a position where it would be noticed quickly. Sometime soon, i hope to repair some of it myself.76.226.96.194 (talk) 03:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
82nd Academy Awards
why did you remove star trek award I've just added to the academy awards??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mic of orion (talk • contribs)
Dear Mr. Unknown: Star Trek didn't win or do any NOTABLE unlike other pictures, also, who put it marked Star Trek as a Best Picture nominee.TbhotchTalk2 Me 16:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are you taking a piss, and don't call me unknown have some respect, or I will report you to the admins and have you banned from editing wiki, and I mean main admin (owners) in US.
Star trek won the award, all movies that have won the awards have been listed, so I see no reason for Star Trek not be listed as well, after all "Up in the air", didn't won a single award and it is there. So stop that nonsense, unless you wish me to go to further with this and have you reported for vandalizing.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mic of orion (talk • contribs)
stop spamming my inbox, you have issues talk on 82md awards discussion page, Star Trek won the Oscar for best make up, which is 1 more than what Up in the air did, and was nominated for 3 more Oscars which it didn’t won.
Any move nominated for four Oscars (no matter what you think) should be there. Simple as. Mic of orion (talk) 17:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and sorry
Thank you for helping me keep J.G. Wentworth clean, and sorry i keep reverting to a version without template and with spacing.
again thanks for your help —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scamwatch (talk • contribs) 00:48, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
J.G. Wentworth Lead text
Again, thanks for helping with the lead text, i am also planning on updating the whole article this week.Scamwatch (talk) 02:10, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
GA review
Hi there. I noticed that you are a member of WikiProject:Albums. The article Carnival of Carnage is currently a Good Article nominee, but is on a long backlog. Would you be interested in reviewing the GAN? (Sugar Bear (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:AmericanLifeLive.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AmericanLifeLive.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Searching for it returns 0 ghits, wow. I may or may not tag it since it claims to be the first Latin American record label to sell over the internet, but searching for it Find sources:Google (books·news·scholar·free images·WP refs) ·FENS·JSTOR·TWL returns no hits. Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 04:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I COULD find some ghits, but no reliable sources, so might as well PROD. Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 04:08, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Whilst i agree that twitter is not a good source the picture clearly shows a HMV store where the cover is the official single art cover. It is the contents which is most important. Often songs recieve a promo cover and then a proper cover upon CD release. This is widespread practise. Therefore i've reverted your reversion. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:53, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
left you a response on the talk page because i dont think you understood the issue but at the same time are making the same point as me.Lil-unique1 (talk) 03:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
hello, there's more developments at the discussion. If you have chance take a look and tell us what you think.Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Alejandro (song)
Hi, you are waaaay past WP:3RR on Alejandro (song). If the detrimental edits are overwhelming you should ask for page protection instead, simply going on with reverts (in particular using rollback on unsourced, yet non-vandalistic edits) can quickly backfire. Cheers, Amalthea 20:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
New Billboard chart policy
As per consensus at WP:record charts there is a new guide to using Billboard Charts available at Billboard charts guide. Mainstream Top 40 (Pop Songs) (formerly known just as Pop Songs) is no longer deemed a component chart - there is no evidence to support this motion. I am no longer persuing the change of chart names. see the dicussion for why. :) Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Anna Anderson
Of course, I reverted it myself. InFairness (talk) 01:07, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Anna Anderson
No, I reverted it. Regardless of what the history says. I pushed the wrong button--save instead of show preview. Now y'all stop harrassing me for an innocent mistake. You don't like it, kiss my ass. InFairness (talk) 01:07, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"According to the History, I reverted you edition. "
Not that at least two others didn't try. You're just quicker. :) Dlohcierekim 01:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pop Songs reverts to Mainstream Top 40 (Pop Songs). Via consensus this is the name we've settled on because the two billboard sites (.com / .biz) refer to it as Pop Songs or Mainstream Top 40. Because there was no preference either way it was decided to name it both. As per WP:USCHARTS which contains the charts with their officially approved names. Lil-unique1 (talk) 02:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All I Ever Wanted (Kelly Clarkson song)
Leona Lewis's song ahd more coverage.. This single barely has any (it's not even getting a music video). unfortunatley, not all singles become notable, in spite of what fans wish for Alan - talk 05:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. the Leona song you linked to saying it never charted, did chart in multiple countries.. as for the Clarkson song, it doesn't even have album art, all the images being put up for it's cover are fan-made using photoshop back in January and February (yes, wikipedia ads that data when images are uploaded) Alan - talk 05:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're probably right about it never getting coverage.. but then again, it can still chart on a major chart since it's on the component charts now, and getting enough airplay, only time will tell. Alan - talk 05:46, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Talkback
Hello, Tbhotch. You have new messages at WP:RPP. Message added 04:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
On 5 April 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Baja California earthquake, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.
Thank you for this. That IP has a lengthy history of not adhering to policy, especially the WP:RS. They only start to respond when the article they're warring on gets protection. Anyhow, thanks again. It can get tiresome defending that article :) Pinkadelica♣ 01:02, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
comment
How wat did i do —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrFYE (talk • contribs) 01:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That is not my u tube channel —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrFYE (talk • contribs) 01:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're right...
A lot of juvenile- and youth-themed movie articles were under attack. I'll go ahead and lift the block. Thanks for letting me know. PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You got it. In fact, I am trying to work with the vandal in question since he's showing a willingness to change. Here's hoping... PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:51, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Game
Hi. The edits you reverted [1] are indeed sourced. Coby Bell has joined burn notice and will be a recurring character. 64.26.98.90 (talk) 22:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bucket Seats
My contribution to the Wikipedia entry "bucket seats" was completely worthwhile and valid. It does not surprise me to find it policed and redacted on a website frequented by pavid vermin such as yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.36.97.101 (talk) 18:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Talkback
Hello, Tbhotch. You have new messages at Crystal Clear x3's talk page. Message added 20:00, 7 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Merriam-Webster goes on to say: "...traditionally, however, only the apostrophe is added when the s would not be pronounced in normal speech".
I would venture to say that most people say "Douglas-es", therefore an apostrophe is mandatory.
Please do not change this again--I will simply change it back. This is an important point of English grammar that goes back to Shakespeare's time and is gradually being lost on the world, the editorial policies of Time Magazine and The Wall Street Journal notwithstanding.
Cbrodersen (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
For the WP:RPP fix... was wondering why didn't work. Tommy (msg) 03:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Howdy and thanks for the cookies
I did a pretty severe edit on the Reza Pahlavi page as you were doing yours. Not trying to war with you, but I am trying to reduce the self-promotion of the page as it existed. Have a good night! PR (talk) 05:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't normally laugh at vandalism but I can't stop giggling at this! Parrotof Doom 17:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
revert
This ip has the same editing pattern as aradic-es and pushes the same pov in the football riots article. [2] If you would take a closer look at his nonsensical edits you would notice he has added latin, changed the demographics, and added unsourced information. ◅ PRODUCER(TALK) 18:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
very funny! If you take a look a revert... you will see
see the article Muslims by nationality-prior 1991 there were no any "Bosniaks" there.Referring them as Bosniaks is unsourced and his WP:OR
just look at the official source . No "Bošnjaci" but "Muslimani".So, his version is
also leaving spam amoung external links is good thing???
Latin name of place is valid information as any alternative name.
Therefore only vandal in this situation is PRODUCER and I suggest you not to follow his pattern!
= Trivia
There are notable events sections in other Oscar ceremony articles. I'm not trying to create a trivia section. I'm trying to give information on details. Here are other example:
Thanks for uploading File:Salvadorcabañas es+.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.38.50 (talk) 04:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lady Gaga and RedOne
Hi there, please do not refer Lady Gaga and RedOne as "Stefani Germanotta" and "Nadir Khayat". If this is not changed in due course, I shall have to report you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlieJS13 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment
But you have to admit, I was pretty fast. I vandalized it after it had only been up for a few seconds.--9999 pound elephant (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
RPP for Luis moisés peña lévano
Sorry about listing that, I thought if it was creation-protected it showed up on the log here [5], didn't realize it only shows up on the public log at [6]. mauler90 (talk) 00:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just wondering if you're using automated tools to leave warnings? I noticed this [8], which is a warning on an accounts talk page, but for some reason the Shared IP notice dropped in? Burpelson AFB (talk) 00:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok. I thought maybe it was a Twinkle bug because of the leading numbers in the account's name. Burpelson AFB (talk) 01:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
User:CharlieJS13
Is there a reason why he/she was removing comments from your page? I'm considering taking out an ANI/edit war report out against him/her because he/she has failed to respond to discussions about crediting Gaga's songwriting on Telephone as her birth name and i would like to know if his edits to your page were deliberate or not. They will form part of the report.Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Threaten
Please do not threaten me on the site. If you continue to do so, I will have to contact an administrator about you. CharlieJS13 (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you're talking about a Wikipedia article, then it is not your talk page. Your talk page is on your home page. CharlieJS13 (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Moving RFPP around
Is it a new agreed-upon thing to re-arrange RFPP to bring unaddressed requests to the top, or did you unilaterally decide that was a good idea? I'm not so sure about it; it messes up the timelines. Tan | 39 15:56, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you
I just wanted to thank you for getting Saw VII protected for two weeks. Every time I ask for protection it's two or three days! Ugh. I guess it depends on the admin (Fastily is awesome though). Just wanted to come by and tell you that. :) —MikeAllen 06:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Talkback
Hello, Tbhotch. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection. Message added 21:07, 19 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I have left more detailed rationale on my decline, hope this helps. Taelus (talk) 21:07, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed duration. Thanks for noticing.—Kww(talk) 04:50, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lady Gaga songwriter
- I would advise you to change the songwriter row about Lady Gaga immediately. The song articles were perfect before you came along and changed them. Please change them back to Lady Gaga and RedOne respectively. CharlieJS13 (talk) 18:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Vandalise
Then I will have no choice other than to contact an administrator for unreliably sourced information on the song articles. CharlieJS13 (talk) 18:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Brexx edits
Brexx isn't permitted to contribute. His contributions to articles can stand if another editor stands behind them, but his participation on talk pages serve no purpose whatsoever. The only time an article on a talk page should stand is if another editor has already responded to it. In this case, there had been no response.
Bear in mind that the goal is to have Brexx leave. Anything which provides him encouragement works against that.—Kww(talk) 18:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your warning re removal of poorly sourced material on living persons
Re this
No, content was about living persons. Please see WP:BLP: "Remove immediately any contentious material about a living person that is unsourced or poorly sourced...The three-revert rule does not apply to such removals." 92.30.16.168 (talk) 20:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
About "edit war" and [SpinWatch]
Dear Tbhotch,
Thank you for your message. I really do not want to be in an edit war. I don't think that the material I added was wrong or malicious, just giving a broader idea of what [SpinWatch] was about. I would have liked to have collaborated with 92.30.16.168, but he or she just deleted everything I added, without any attempt at trying to find a middle ground. I will take your point to heart, and ask 92.30.16.168 to suggest an alternative wording.Murray McDonald (talk) 20:50, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How did I vandalize
I apologize for not signing my post before. You have marked me down for vandalism, but I do not know on what. Please respond on my talk page with what I vandalized. Iankap99 Iankap99 21:57, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're not the only one. He's also been vandalizing the Lady Gaga song articles too by changing the stage names to the real names. They used to be perfect, but because of him, they don't look the same. CharlieJS13 (talk 18:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here
As far as I know, you didn't has been vandalizing Wikipedia. Could you bee a little more explicit in which article I said that? TbhotchTalk C. 00:00, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
"This might be my fault, but on the vandalism watch thats on my profile it says "Moderate vandalism at this moment." with your signature after it." —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Iankap99 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ogg
To create an Ogg music file, I use Audacity. It's kind of like Windows Movie Maker for music. If you import an MP3 music file onto Audacity, you are able to cut and chop the file to the correct size and then export it as an OggVorbis file, which you can then upload to Wikipedia. Pyrrhus16 16:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]