→A Voice for Men AFD: I don't see anything sanctionable under the article probation, which includes edit warring, personal attacks, incivility and assumptions of bad faith. I think you should just let the AfD run it's course. There are plenty of rel |
→re: Withdrawal: new section |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
Hi TParis, I know your fairly busy now, but could you take a look at the contributions of user [[User: Photon lloyd| Photon lloyd]], Their only edits are to put A Voice for Men up for AFD, and to call it a hate group at the same time. I've got no real comment as to whether the article should be deleted or not, but I'm fairly certain the article falls under the Mens Rights Movement Article Probation. What's more, the group is fairly small, and calling it a hate group can run afoul of [[WP: BLP]]. I'm not saying stop the AFD, but this type of AFD posting just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. --[[User:Kyohyi|Kyohyi]] ([[User talk:Kyohyi|talk]]) 14:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC) |
Hi TParis, I know your fairly busy now, but could you take a look at the contributions of user [[User: Photon lloyd| Photon lloyd]], Their only edits are to put A Voice for Men up for AFD, and to call it a hate group at the same time. I've got no real comment as to whether the article should be deleted or not, but I'm fairly certain the article falls under the Mens Rights Movement Article Probation. What's more, the group is fairly small, and calling it a hate group can run afoul of [[WP: BLP]]. I'm not saying stop the AFD, but this type of AFD posting just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. --[[User:Kyohyi|Kyohyi]] ([[User talk:Kyohyi|talk]]) 14:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
:I don't see anything sanctionable under the article probation, which includes edit warring, personal attacks, incivility and assumptions of bad faith. I think you should just let the AfD run it's course. There are plenty of reliable sources to support the article's notability and the new editor will learn quickly that "I don't like it" isn't a deletion rationale.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 18:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC) |
:I don't see anything sanctionable under the article probation, which includes edit warring, personal attacks, incivility and assumptions of bad faith. I think you should just let the AfD run it's course. There are plenty of reliable sources to support the article's notability and the new editor will learn quickly that "I don't like it" isn't a deletion rationale.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 18:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
== re: Withdrawal == |
|||
Yes, I don't think there is much point in keeping this up. Assorted shenanigans are now threatening to cause trouble to other editors; I don't want to see people bickering about edit waring, or causing trouble for MONGO, FSP, you or anyone else unlucky enough to get involved in this mess. Let this end here and move on. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 00:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:09, 12 February 2014
USER PAGE | TALK PAGE | CONTRIBUTIONS | AWARDS | DASHBOARD | RECALL | MOTIVES | POLITICS | RTRC |
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Holiday wishes!
I wish you success and happiness in your endeavours for this coming year, and I hope we'll be able to carry on improving the wonderful project that is Wikipedia together! Keep rocking on! :)
|
Merry Christmas!
Searching ArbCom
In this edit you stated, "Arbcom already heard MilesMoney's appeal and gave a solid rejection back at him."
I would like to read that appeal.
I tried searching this page for "Milesmoney", which returned three pages, none of which were the appeal.
So I am interested in knowing how to search for something in ArbCom, as my approach failed, and I would be interested to see the appeal, so if you have a link, or a way to find the link, I would appreciate it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 03:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, you can ignore this request. I was puzzled that ArbCom would entertain such an appeal, because it was my understanding that BASC rather than ArbCom had jurisdiction. I see that it was BASC who dismissed the appeal.--S Philbrick(Talk) 03:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
FYI
Greetings, while browsing Category:Username_internal_link_templates, I tried out {{IP_summary}}, and the "count" link went to http://toolserver.org/~tparis/pcount/index.php which after awhile redirected to http://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/pcount/index.php ...
Shouldn't the proper behavior be to go directly to the wmf labs url like the {{User summary}} template? I didn't check any of the other templates in that category which may have a "count" option. FYI. ...172.162.77.52 (talk) 15:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Looks like someone saw your message and updates the links already. Thanks for pointing it out.--v/r - TP 18:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Opinion
As you were the closer on the ANI-set editing restrictions [1]) for Lucia Black, I need your opinion if this might be a problem.
Specifically, in long discussion on the MOS:TM talk page, Lucia stated that "You know who you're really calling an idiot Gaijin? the people who are for the MOS". (Note that Gaijin commented before that "It appears that people that pronounce the "five" [in Deadmau5] are generally considered idiots and called out for it widely." - as this was not a comment to goad Lucia in any way). I suggested to them they may want to retract that comment. They replied on my talk page, saying they weren't going to do that and that they were only under an IBAN (which seems wrong), and then proceed to expand on that comment on MOS:TM's talk page. And they did wipe that warning I gave too.
I've not been involved in the larger issues with Lucia so I don't know how serious this, hence why I ask for a check. If you believe this is a problem, I can handle the larger report to ANI if that's needed. If this is nothing to worry about, I'll let it drop. --MASEM (t) 17:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- There are several restrictions on Lucia but they all relate to ChrisGualtieri for the most part. There is a specific restriction that allows any administrator to ban her from a page if she is causing disruption. I've looked over Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Trademarks and I don't see any particular disruptive behavior. Even the comments you quote above, it's just a snarky parody of Gaijin's own comments. I'm not sure there is anything actionable here. She's certainly being rude and scratching the surface of WP:CIVIL. For someone who is recently under new sanctions, she should be careful in how she acts. But again, nothing actionable at this time. Sorry, Masem.--v/r - TP 18:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Clarey Bridge
Sorry to delay responding ... I meant to do so last night but I was up late watching the Beatles tribute with my wife and that turned out to be more tiring than I thought, so after it ended the next thing I really remember is waking up on the couch an hour later.
But enough about me ... I was thinking about your request and what exactly you want to do and how I could help you. What sort of help are you looking for? What are your ultimate goals for the article? Those are the questions we should begin with. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
A Voice for Men AFD
Hi TParis, I know your fairly busy now, but could you take a look at the contributions of user Photon lloyd, Their only edits are to put A Voice for Men up for AFD, and to call it a hate group at the same time. I've got no real comment as to whether the article should be deleted or not, but I'm fairly certain the article falls under the Mens Rights Movement Article Probation. What's more, the group is fairly small, and calling it a hate group can run afoul of WP: BLP. I'm not saying stop the AFD, but this type of AFD posting just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. --Kyohyi (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see anything sanctionable under the article probation, which includes edit warring, personal attacks, incivility and assumptions of bad faith. I think you should just let the AfD run it's course. There are plenty of reliable sources to support the article's notability and the new editor will learn quickly that "I don't like it" isn't a deletion rationale.--v/r - TP 18:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
re: Withdrawal
Yes, I don't think there is much point in keeping this up. Assorted shenanigans are now threatening to cause trouble to other editors; I don't want to see people bickering about edit waring, or causing trouble for MONGO, FSP, you or anyone else unlucky enough to get involved in this mess. Let this end here and move on. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)