→Nomination of Jenna Rose for deletion: My only involvement was closing the last AfD |
No edit summary |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
So here's the deal: stop trying to bait me into objecting too strongly to your fucktardery and I won't need to come back. Deal? Leave me a talkback if you desperately want me to unretire. <span style="font: Tahoma, Arial, San-Serif; font-size: 8pt;">'''˜[[User:Danjel|danjel]]''' [ [[User_talk:Danjel|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Danjel|contribs]] ]</span> 08:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC) |
So here's the deal: stop trying to bait me into objecting too strongly to your fucktardery and I won't need to come back. Deal? Leave me a talkback if you desperately want me to unretire. <span style="font: Tahoma, Arial, San-Serif; font-size: 8pt;">'''˜[[User:Danjel|danjel]]''' [ [[User_talk:Danjel|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Danjel|contribs]] ]</span> 08:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Really? You're going to lecture me on hypocrisy? Apparently you spend too much time around those kids because your throwing quite the tantrum. You came back yesterday, un-'baited', and continued to harass the closer and participants. You did that on your own - and I simply reported it. The difference between closes is that my request was supported by 100% of the participants. Yours held less than 33% (32% and change). How about you just do yourself a favor and leave for good. Every time you come back and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pass_a_Method&diff=prev&oldid=542294780 harass Epeefleche] and those who [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&diff=prev&oldid=542295642 supported him], I'm going to be on top of it. That's the real baiting right there: the crap you spam around Wikipedia trying to get attention. What a joke you are. It's been my highest pleasure, but go away now.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 13:58, 7 March 2013 (UTC) |
:Really? You're going to lecture me on hypocrisy? Apparently you spend too much time around those kids because your throwing quite the tantrum. You came back yesterday, un-'baited', and continued to harass the closer and participants. You did that on your own - and I simply reported it. The difference between closes is that my request was supported by 100% of the participants. Yours held less than 33% (32% and change). How about you just do yourself a favor and leave for good. Every time you come back and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pass_a_Method&diff=prev&oldid=542294780 harass Epeefleche] and those who [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&diff=prev&oldid=542295642 supported him], I'm going to be on top of it. That's the real baiting right there: the crap you spam around Wikipedia trying to get attention. What a joke you are. It's been my highest pleasure, but go away now.--v/r - [[User:TParis|T]][[User_talk:TParis|P]] 13:58, 7 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Nomination of [[Bush Derangement Syndrome]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[Bush Derangement Syndrome]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bush Derangement Syndrome (6th nomination) ]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:Yworo|Yworo]] ([[User talk:Yworo|talk]]) 18:06, 9 March 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:06, 9 March 2013
USER PAGE | TALK PAGE | CONTRIBUTIONS | AWARDS | DASHBOARD | RECALL | MOTIVES | POLITICS | RTRC |
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
BHG talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for restoring my comments
I thought it was an edit conflict (I believe that was the message I got when I hit "Save page") and clicked to move out of the editing window before I copied the post and thought it was gone forever. Don't know how you did it but thanks!--Amadscientist (talk) 02:20, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Lol, it was in the edit history ;)--v/r - TP 02:22, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Well, thanks for noticing it. I just gave up too quickly I guess.--Amadscientist (talk) 02:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 16:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Rschen7754 16:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Since you thought it was done...
I just want to be sure you see the additional msg. I've left you on my talk page. LadyofShalott 20:37, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Stop. The only reason why I keep coming back here to deal with your bullshit is because you and your friends keep insisting on posting to my talkpage, resulting in an e-mail notification turning up in my inbox and reminding me that this fucktardery is still flapping in the wind. All of the other loose ends have been tied off except for your crazy obsession. In regards to the last ANI thread, and your subsequent posts to the closer's talkpage, do you not see any hypocrisy in complaining about a close to a thread about me complaining about a close? Or your posts elsewhere about how you're a forgiving and reasonable person and yet you continue to hound a user who has, for all intents and purposes, walked away from the fight? You have completely lost perspective.
So here's the deal: stop trying to bait me into objecting too strongly to your fucktardery and I won't need to come back. Deal? Leave me a talkback if you desperately want me to unretire. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 08:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Really? You're going to lecture me on hypocrisy? Apparently you spend too much time around those kids because your throwing quite the tantrum. You came back yesterday, un-'baited', and continued to harass the closer and participants. You did that on your own - and I simply reported it. The difference between closes is that my request was supported by 100% of the participants. Yours held less than 33% (32% and change). How about you just do yourself a favor and leave for good. Every time you come back and harass Epeefleche and those who supported him, I'm going to be on top of it. That's the real baiting right there: the crap you spam around Wikipedia trying to get attention. What a joke you are. It's been my highest pleasure, but go away now.--v/r - TP 13:58, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Bush Derangement Syndrome for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bush Derangement Syndrome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bush Derangement Syndrome (6th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yworo (talk) 18:06, 9 March 2013 (UTC)