No edit summary |
|||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:: But I want to say thanks for all the advice, I still owe you some GT pictures, don’t I? [[User:TDC|Ten Dead Chickens]] 23:24, 3 February 2006 (UTC) |
:: But I want to say thanks for all the advice, I still owe you some GT pictures, don’t I? [[User:TDC|Ten Dead Chickens]] 23:24, 3 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Seeking Help== |
|||
I am preparing conduct RFC's against [[User:Commodore Sloat]] and [[User:Ryan Freisling]]. They have been harrassing me because I have resisted their attempts to push POV in several articles, including [[Plame Affair]] and [[Larry C. Johnson]]. They and their POV allies have just lauched an unjustified attack RFC on my conduct.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User:Mr_j_galt] I will eventually need someone to join me to certify both RFC's. Could you please review the situation. If you agree that their conduct is becoming a problem, could you weigh in on their talk pages or one of the article talk pages (a pre-requisite to certify a conduct RFC)? It would be appreciated. Thanks! --[[User:Mr j galt|Mr j galt]] 00:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)- |
Revision as of 00:13, 5 February 2006
User_talk:TDC/Archive_1 User_talk:TDC/Archive_2 user_talk:TDC/Archive_3 user_talk:TDC/Archive_4
Friday June 21th 23:12
Depleted uranium dispute resolution
As agreed, I had the DU article unlocked and replaced it with the /basic verson with links to the Health effects and Gulf War syndrome pages, bringing this round to an end. I think the fact that we managed to hammer this out by ourselves is a feather in our caps and an example to all who are in conflicts on the 'pedia. I thank you all. --DV8 2XL 01:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hip Hip! DTC 02:51, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
FYI...if that edit war starts again and I see you post to AN/3RR, I'll block him. I think you request was overlooked due to unsympathetic admins and I just now noticed it,,,he/she appears to have moved ona bit though.--MONGO 05:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
TDC or DTC?
Why did you change your sig to read DTC? Any reason in particular, or just felt like it? Just curious. --LV (Dark Mark) 00:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- I was feeling frisky. DTC, ''T''en ''D''ead ''C''hickens 05:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC) 00:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enough. ;-) --LV (Dark Mark) 01:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Final decision
The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Winter Soldier case. Raul654 21:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hi TDC, I hope you can give up your edit warring. I imagin every editor you've tangled with is saying to themselves about now:
- hmmm... how can I provoke TDC, shouldn't take much more to get him banned from the whole project.
- Don't take the bait :) For what its worth I think the resolution was a good one. --Duk 23:14, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- I say forget about that article, I am done with it! Time to take it off my watch list and move onto someone else. All I ever wanted to do was to bring the anon to the table and force him to play on a level playing field and play by the rules like anyone else would have to (as I myself have been forced to), and now that I have accomplished that, I will never respond to him again. I would say the ruling was good one as well. There is no way I can honestly say that I did not act inappropriately from time to time, because I did, no way to deny it. But I have learned from my mistakes, and have been able to compromise with many disparate users on many different articles. This whole process has been a drain of epic proportions, and I am dancing with glee about the fact that other editors who have given up on the WSI article can finally get back to it without being molested to the point of a mental explosion by what can only be described as the most deceptive and malicious user I have ever run across. The resolution was good, and if it takes sacrificing my ability to edit in order to deal with Rob the Earthlink Anon, then so be it.
- But I want to say thanks for all the advice, I still owe you some GT pictures, don’t I? Ten Dead Chickens 23:24, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Seeking Help
I am preparing conduct RFC's against User:Commodore Sloat and User:Ryan Freisling. They have been harrassing me because I have resisted their attempts to push POV in several articles, including Plame Affair and Larry C. Johnson. They and their POV allies have just lauched an unjustified attack RFC on my conduct.[1] I will eventually need someone to join me to certify both RFC's. Could you please review the situation. If you agree that their conduct is becoming a problem, could you weigh in on their talk pages or one of the article talk pages (a pre-requisite to certify a conduct RFC)? It would be appreciated. Thanks! --Mr j galt 00:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)-