If I posted on your talk page, I have it watched so you can reply there.
It just makes for easier reading. Thanks.Archived pages: July 2005 - Jan 2006 | Jan 2006 - Feb 2006 | 20 Feb 2006 - 3 April 2006 | 3 April 2006 - 7 June 2006 | 7 June 2006 - 6 September 2006 | 6 September 2006 - 3 February 2007 | 3 February 2007 - 3 May 2010 | 3 May 2010 - 30 July 2010 | 30 July 2010 - 17 August 2011
Jediism edits
What about wikipedia providing actual and honest information about jediism. Currently it does not present anything jediism related. What it talks and references is Star Wars jedi fandom. Jediists are actually not some Star Wars robe wearing and Walmart spooking weirdos. It is like Buddhism, and not about clowning before public. Now I thought I can just delete and write a more accurate representation of jediism, because it does not even describe with 1 one what actual jediism is. Is this the spirit of Wikipedia, to care about cited content and not the actual information about something?! I did not wrote this what I did for no reason out of nowhere, I've been involved in jediism movement for over a decade now. It's not just because of that, but truly some guy visiting market and getting kicked out of there bcause of hood has nothing to do with jediism. Real jediist would rather care about the public and not make disturbing shows before public just to get attention. Also real jediism has very little to do with Star Wars. Yes it is inspired by the ideals of jedi which are a combination of chivalric tenets, samurai service, buddhist way of life, etc, but it's not a following of Star Wars as it's Bible. In fact, for true adherents it does not even have to be named "jedi". Star Wars brought the inspiration and ideas that are combination of many good philosophies, so in honor and remembrance of the source we call it jediism, but we could call it whatever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droid733 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Honestly, I agree but this strives to be an encyclopedia and therefore has to have cited references. If there are good books on jediism that actually discuss the philosophy, either in layman terms or in scholarly terms, then that would be a good start to either putting in more about jediist philosophy to the jediism article or starting a side article on that. As you already said, most of the news articles tend to be 'Huurr guy standing outside the Walmart telling people to be mindful of the Force'...but if that is all we have to go on, thats what the article ends up as. I hope this helps. Syrthiss (talk) 16:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Lab Macambira
Lab Macambira is the result of Brazilian digital culture movement from both governmental and civil sides. All model is completely OPEN, all code, trac, wiki, databases, ideas, etc. As stated in the article, it is being studied by other collectives as the most advanced line of activism, at least in Brazil. Please resurrect the articles. If you really want institutional relevance, ONU (UN - United Nations) is using Lab Macambira derivative works. Relevant might also be that some Brazilian counsels and forums are using Lab Macambira software. Even so, it is stronger in non-institutional activities (e.g. there are about 200 didactic videos in Brazilian Portuguese in vimeo made and uploaded in July an august: http://vimeo.com/channels/labmacambira ). What do you want to know more about? Can't really the article start as simple as it was and grow as society fells like it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rfabbri (talk • contribs) 14:35, 24 August 2011 (UTC) Fixed this other user's text so that English-speaking people can understand it - United Nations is ONU in portuguese Liberio (talk) 20:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Please revive this page. Lab macambira (and its website urls http://labmacambira.tk, http://labmacambira.sourceforge.net) is listed among several websites including wikipedia pages. Let me know what you need and I will provide you with detailed information. (Also, I will leave a note here that this discussion shouldn't revolve around convincing a single individual.) Thank you. Liberio (talk) 20:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Good morning Liberio. As I said above, I need pages external to Lab Macambira that help support its notability. So if there are official UN pages referencing it, I'd be happy to restore it. I would restore it now, but as it sits it would probably be deleted by another admin causing both you and Rfabbri to have to start this discussion over with them. Best to sort out the issues at least to a basic level and then recreate it. Syrthiss (talk) 11:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Syrthiss, thank you for your reply. From what I have been seeing in Google, Lab Macambira is rapidly increasing in notability, specially as external sites are linking to them. Thus, we can restore this page soon, and in a solid way as you said, so that the page can stand uncontested. Liberio (talk) 02:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent, I look forward to it. Syrthiss (talk) 13:13, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- United nations pages reference to Lab Macambira like this: http://righttohousingdebates.org/?lang=en uses the Lab Macambira system for online deliberation which was marketed by the company Ethymos to which there is a link at the bottom of the referenced UN page. To prove that Ethymos works with Lab Macambira in this deliberative system, check out http://ethymos.com.br/blog/delibera-a-solucao-para-a-organizacao-de-reunioes-e-conferencias/ (it is in portuguese but you can search for "Lab Macambira"). There. Can we now restore this wikipedia page? I will include this UN usage there. Liberio (talk) 04:01, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent, I look forward to it. Syrthiss (talk) 13:13, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- Also check out http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scilab which cites Lab Macambira. Checkout their website http://labmacambira.sf.net. Checkout a link to Lab Macambira at the bottom of the SIP toolbox http://siptoolbox.sourceforge.net. There is a radio show which interviewed Lab Macambira a couple of times: http://www.radio.ufscar.br/frequenciaaberta/?p=256 and http://www.radio.ufscar.br/frequenciaaberta/?p=269. Lab Macambira members made contributions to other widely-known software, for instance Ekiga: http://git.gnome.org/browse/ekiga/commit/?id=79f7ceb6e3 and Mozilla Firefox https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548263 (AndresMRM and daniloshiga are both members of Lab macambira, see http://wiki.nosdigitais.teia.org.br/Equipe_Lab_Macambira).Liberio (talk) 04:26, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Liberio (talk) 01:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I haven't received a reply. Kindly respond or provide an update, Mr. Admin. Thanks!Liberio (talk) 03:08, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry I am on vacation this week so not around to take actions. To me, none of those sites explicitly support the notability. Its all very circumstantial (see the UN references us, but only through a developer that uses some of our stuff). However, I don't want to hold you up in case I am just missing something. Feel free to recreate the article if you think those show the notability. Make sure you support facts with a reference that claims them. Regards. Syrthiss (talk) 13:36, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
CML Microcircuits Page
Good afternoon,
I see you have previously deleted the page for CML Microcircuits (syr's note - page deleted in June 2010, contributing editor blocked as spamusername not by me), citing an infringement from CHinaICmart or some sort of website.
As the manufacturer of these parts, I am curious why you would delete the page and cite that the datasheet website was the correct information?
I think the page should stand and be re made. But thought I would contact you first.
Mocks1287 (talk) 15:06, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- It is good that you contacted me first. (1) We don't care what the source for the plagiarized content is, we just delete that kind of content on sight and advise those who are contributing it on the proper way to release content to Wikipedia. This is to protect your rights as the copyright holder. That said (2) the deleted material was not suitable for Wikipedia because it was very promotional in tone. In fact, that is why your previous account CML Micro was blocked from editing the encyclopedia. Often people would like to just cut and paste their own website material to Wikipedia, but tone that is perfectly acceptable on your own website is glaringly out of place in a neutral informative encyclopedia article. If you can establish that the company is notable and produce a neutrally phrased article on it, we'd be happy to have an article on your company. Hope this was useful to you. Syrthiss (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply, I admit the first attempt at a page I had not read the rules regarding writing a piece. It was my intention to improve the page. It is not our intention to use this site as a promotional tool, we are the oldest semiconductor manufacturer in the UK which should make us notable, we would like to submit a piece with our history, and what the company does today. What is the best way for us to do this? To provide a user such as yourself with the information? Or to try again ourselves and make it as neutral as possible? Mocks1287 (talk) 15:06, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Dear Mocks1287 - we have a few avenues available to you then. You could place a request at Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Business_and_economics/Businesses_and_organizations to suggest that someone experienced create an article for you. This is the most cautious route with respect to avoiding advertising conflicts, but is also the slowest (as in, it may be days to months before an article gets created). You could use the article wizard WP:WIZ and follow the steps to either submit the article for review or create a userspace draft. Both of those options places the burden on you to create the article, and the difference between the two is that the article submission route lets someone experienced look at what you have written and give you feedback before the page goes live. That is my suggested route for you. You can also go the userspace draft route, and then leave me a message here to take a look when you feel your page is done. I'm afraid I cannot write the article for you at this time. I hope this is helpful. Syrthiss (talk) 14:02, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Dear Syrthiss, could you take a look at the following link, and let me know if im on the right lines, or still going about it the wrong way? I dont want to waste too much time on it if its wrong! Thanks a lot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mocks1287/Enter_your_new_article_name_here
Mocks1287 (talk) 16:45, 15 September 2011 (GMT)
- You are doing pretty good. Basic facts are there. Personally I'd drop the 'products' section, maybe renamed to 'Notable products' or something to keep the Concorde reference. In comparison, if you looked at a page for a big business like Cisco Systems or IBM they have product sections that are nowhere near as detailed. I'm a little nervous that despite existing for 40 years I couldn't find links in google news searches for the company, but perhaps a search under its prior name would resolve that. If you could present references that support that fact, it would help if the article was sent for a deletion discussion. Syrthiss (talk) 15:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tips, I will change the product section definitely. If you search for CML Microcircuits there are hundred of websites with mentions, I assure you. What is it you are searching for? I am still trying to link in other pages, and technologies but haven't had the time yet. I will come back to you with an improved page shortly.
Mocks1287 (talk) 16:48, 15 September 2011 (GMT)
Well, yes. If I do a google search for anything on CML Microcircuits I get 160000 hits. If I do a Google News search like this I get no hits. Syrthiss (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
You're invited! Wikimedia DC Annual Membership Meeting
DC Meetup 23 & Annual Membership Meeting | |
---|---|
Wikimedia District of Columbia, the newest officially recognized chapter, is holding its Annual Membership Meeting at 1pm on Saturday, October 1, 2011 at the Tenley-Friendship Neighborhood Library. Agenda items include:
Candidate nominations are open until 11:59pm EDT on Saturday, September 24. We encourage you to consider being a candidate. (see see candidate instructions) The meeting is open to both the general public and members from within the DC-MD-VA-WV-DE region and beyond. We encourage everyone to attend! You may join the chapter at the meeting or online. |
Note: You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude
Need your help
Hello Syrthiss,
One of the article Celoxis I wrote in wiki was deleted and I understand the reason of the deletion. I intended to put this article for the information and not for the advertisement. I am here to provide all the required information on Celoxis as a company and need your help in submitting the article again as it is my first article on wikipedia. Below are some references for Celoxis
Some references
- Business.com (http://www.business.com/guides/online-project-management-2191/)
- PC World (http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/142807/simpler_projectmanaging_apps_get_the_job_done.html)
- TopTen Reviews (http://online-project-management-review.toptenreviews.com/)
- CeoWorld (http://ceoworld.biz/ceo/2011/04/01/top-10-best-online-project-management-services-review-for-ceos-and-entrepreneurs)
Are you around to help? 61.8.140.170 (talk) 12:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
DC-area Meetup, Saturday, October 8
National Archives Backstage Pass - Who should come? You should. Really. | |
---|---|
You are invited to the National Archives in College Park for a special backstage pass and scanathon meetup with Archivist of the United States David Ferriero, on Saturday, October 8. Go behind the scenes and into the stacks at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Free catered lunch provided! Dominic·t 16:33, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
Blocks
Try "Else=hair" , not "Else = hair". DS (talk) 13:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrolling
Hi. I'm just letting you know that I have declined your CSD on RyanShoreUK. He's not the same person. You may wish to re tag with CSD A7 - he's only 15 years old. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Please review these blocks
There was a bug in MediaWiki 1.18 that caused blocks made via the API to have talk page access disabled when it should have been enabled. This also affected scripts such as User:Animum/easyblock.js. Please review the following blocks to make sure that you really intended talk page access to be disabled, and reblock if necessary.
- Are We Done Yet, MascotGuy? (talk · block log · block user) by Syrthiss at 2011-10-06T17:33:01Z, expires infinity: Abusing [[WP:Sock puppetry|multiple accounts]]
- Bay de Way (talk · block log · block user) by Syrthiss at 2011-10-06T17:33:26Z, expires infinity: Abusing [[WP:Sock puppetry|multiple accounts]]
- Mr. Discovery (talk · block log · block user) by Syrthiss at 2011-10-06T17:33:42Z, expires infinity: Abusing [[WP:Sock puppetry|multiple accounts]]
- Squeak Squad (talk · block log · block user) by Syrthiss at 2011-10-06T17:33:57Z, expires infinity: [[WP:Block#Evasion of blocks|Block evasion]]
- DA EVIL PAGE DESTROYER (talk · block log · block user) by Syrthiss at 2011-10-12T15:17:11Z, expires infinity: [[WP:Vandalism-only account|Vandalism-only account]]
If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to post at User talk:Anomie#Allowusertalk issue. Thanks! Anomie⚔ 02:10, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- yepyep, all in order. socks don't get to request unblock. Syrthiss (talk) 11:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
I've declined the speedy for copyright violation on the grounds that the URL you gave as a source doesn't come close to looking like a source for that page, and I'm sure no administrator is willing to look for a needle in a haystack to find the exact page this was copied from. If you can give us a more specific URL, please feel free to re-tag. Thank you. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Dear Blanchardb. Thanks for your fine work here with the encyclopedia. While I realize that any editor may remove a CSD notice, perhaps not all editors should. A specific example of the copyright violation text is at http://www.nm.cz/Naprstek-Museum/Exhibitions-NpM/Around-the-World-in-299-Days.html, but really the entire article is violation text from all of that website which is why I gave the more generic URL. I have restored the copyright violation notice. Syrthiss (talk) 17:12, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Neutron reflector edits
Zircaloy also with trademark and I don`t write without calling for own rights on new reflector tantalum and also to add is tungsten alone, working also other compositions like carbide. I did write material scientist before deleting with no answer but readable also by yourself with more informations also on lead, Fe also C and Be more known as moderator thick reflecting in ESCOM PBMR 1m sidewall. I`m german help with editing is wished.
Kay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kay Uwe Böhm (talk • contribs) 13:02, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Nonsense adding tantalum but delting my copyright for new naterial found by myself and that`s sure no vandalism more deleting. Can you remove vandalism and left inside maybe another form but you have to rely on myself else keep tantalum out. Reference left inside other places also. I worked much on neutron capture Very High Temperature Pebble Bed, neutron moderator also removed by material scientist bit stopped removing other places now reworked. New moderator there hydrocarbons is strange and dangerous just "suggested as another possibility". CH4 changing to 14CT4 radioactive&explosive not so good absorbing see H behavier compared to D later same place and 12C not so small like really good new He under pressure at danger away without danger by myself long time. Also 11BN works or BeO or Li or (H+D+T)2 as gas explosiv but 11BN or He also for RBMK or molten salt reactor Gen4 instead graphite burning main spreader Chornobyl 6000death 1 Mio cancer fukushima 0 just 2% out 1/10 chornobyl with water no burning also longtime nothing.
If time adding long article extension to fukushima waht happend exactly waht areva helped !
Kay — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.165.145.97 (talk) 16:04, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Dear Mr. Böhm. It is very very difficult to follow your English. I will put this as plainly as I can - we do not sign or append email addresses to text in articles. Period. Your contributions are clearly visible in the article history. Now, what you seem to be saying is that this use for tantalum as a neutron reflector is your own discovery. Has this been published in a peer reviewed journal? If not, and you have no reference for this material being used in this way, then it is WP:OR and will be removed until such time as it is citable. I cannot speak to physics topics, just to the policies and editing guidelines of the encyclopedia. Regardless, as I said on your page - any further attempts to add your email address will cause me to block you from editing the encyclopedia. It is disruptive. Do I make myself clear? Syrthiss (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
It is very difficult to work constructive on wikipdia if someone just deleting without understanding and look like lie what you are telling just making problems with nonsense must be published before in newsletter done by emails already also to companies and many other places email address added simply very practible. Adding tantalum usefull but my copyright not for text for use of tantalum has to be kept by wikipedia see own sides. I`m german so english not perfect but also lie difficult to understand and english correction/impovement help directly would be usefull ! Why you are at this side at all ? I can change even more because steal&lead nearly wrong as reflector and Be & C only thick normally moderator. Simply on construction of turnable regulatorstopp-rods in HTR behind so called reflector side walls one side of rod reflector with C/Be/steal/Fe/Pb not works but with W/Ta full only reflector with W absorbing a little bit not Ta invented and published by myself thsi way also in Wikipedia with copyright. Copyright german "Urheberrecht" means nobody else can ask for patent right except myself or over myself by law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.165.141.101 (talk) 11:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Every time you edit the encyclopedia, you pepper it with your email address. If you cannot understand why this is objectionable, perhaps you should restrict yourself to editing the German language wikipedia. The revision I just removed had 3 total email addresses in it, and I refuse to assume good faith anymore and redact only them. This is your final warning - continuing to make edits in this fashion will force me to block your IP and main account. Syrthiss (talk) 11:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Logo-200.jpg
While I understand the renaming of this image (it was a logo for a radio station, WRLF) and I understand the deletion of the old image name, I find it very hard to believe that I requested it deleted as you stated in your edit summary. "Multiple reasons: Speedy deletion criteria R3, G6, G7". G7 is, of course, "Author requests deletion". Since that didn't happen, it is misleading and an outright lie. I kinda don't like that happening. I will pretend it was a slip of the finger and not something intentional. Please, though, try not to let it happen again in the future. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 16:12, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Dear Neutralhomer. Prepare for an incoming AGF warning on your talkpage:
- Page history
- (del/undel) (diff) 08:52, 24 October 2011 . . Armbrust (talk | contribs | block) (73 bytes) (Requesting speedy deletion (CSD R3, CSD G6, CSD G7). (Twinkle))
- (del/undel) (diff) 08:51, 24 October 2011 . . Armbrust (talk | contribs | block) (48 bytes) (moved File:Logo-200.jpg to File:WRLF (radio station) logo.jpg: using User:Splarka/ajaxfilemove.js;Descriptive title)
- So, what it looks like is that Armbrust renamed the file to something else, and then requested the redirect be deleted. I complied with that request, since the redirect page was indeed owned and edited only by him. I suggest you take it up with him. Then I request you take your fucking 'misleading and an outright lie' phrase and learn to edit in a collaborative environment. Syrthiss (talk) 16:19, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Warning was deleted immediately per WP:DTTR. Now, Armburst can rename any file he wants, but he still isn't the author, I am. I am the author of the new file too. Why? I uploaded the original image, making me the author of the file (on Wikipedia). Regardless, G7 should never have been given as a reason. Oh and the "fucking 'misleading and an outright lie' phrase"...that could be considered a personal attack. I will save you the warning. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 16:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- but... the file still exists at File:WRLF (radio station) logo.jpg, with full attribution to you? I deleted a redirect that he created when he moved your file. He can himself request that any page that he created be deleted. Syrthiss (talk) 16:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- That he can, but he didn't create that page. I did. I created page "File:Logo-200.jpg", the one you deleted. It was created when I originally uploaded the image (bad image name, I know, I had just joined Wikipedia). So, I was the author of the page, not him. So, G7 shouldn't have been used. Oh and there wasn't a need for a TB notice, I have you on watchlist. You can lose the snark. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 16:38, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- but... the file still exists at File:WRLF (radio station) logo.jpg, with full attribution to you? I deleted a redirect that he created when he moved your file. He can himself request that any page that he created be deleted. Syrthiss (talk) 16:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Warning was deleted immediately per WP:DTTR. Now, Armburst can rename any file he wants, but he still isn't the author, I am. I am the author of the new file too. Why? I uploaded the original image, making me the author of the file (on Wikipedia). Regardless, G7 should never have been given as a reason. Oh and the "fucking 'misleading and an outright lie' phrase"...that could be considered a personal attack. I will save you the warning. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 16:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I'll lose the snark when you stop accusing me of lying. If you were not, and were instead accusing him of lying then my snark level will decrease but not entirely go away. Syrthiss (talk) 16:41, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- See, I never said you were lying, I said G7 was a lie, never you. I actually gave you the benefit of the doubt and asked, politely, to not let it happen again. You can't hear tones of voice in text, but I think I made it clear in writing the original post. If I had been accusing you of lying, I would have come straight out and said it, "I think you are being misleading and outright lying" or something like that. I am not the kind of person to beat around a bush or any kind of lawn decoration. So, the snark, it isn't needed nor warranted. I wouldn't use it anyway, gives people the wrong signals and makes people less likely to work with you, since this is a "collaborative environment". - Neutralhomer • Talk • 16:52, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- (3O from a talk page stalker) NH, when you accuse someone of making an "outright lie", it's unreasonable to expect not to be met with snark. I see people claiming all the time "I didn't say you were a liar, I said that what you said was a lie", but it's kind of a rhetorical game; you can't tell a lie if you aren't a liar. Perhaps instead of "lie" (an intentional untruth) you meant "incorrect"? In general, "lie" is a good word to avoid about 99% of the time. As an outside observer, your original message did not come across as "polite", as you seem to think. (Also, if you want to get technical about it, when Armbrust moved the page, he became the author of the redirect page, so G7 was OK anyway. But why get technical about it?) --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:04, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
(edit conflict)::See, in an environment where I cannot recall ever having interacted with you before (tho surely I must have) I don't know what you would and would not do. Where I come from (which I know you do not know), being called a liar is a very big thing. I would say for many Westerners, that is the case. I will now accept your assurances that when you wrote that it was an outright lie, you meant the tag and not that I (or Armbrust) were lying about the tags. I will also apologize for being upset at perceiving your wording as calling me a liar. I hope that now that you can do whatever you wish with your moved file whose redirect I deleted. Regards, Syrthiss (talk) 17:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- I will accept your apology and give one of my own. Not that I am putting any excuses forth, but I have Aspergers (a form of Autism) and what to me sounds perfectly normal, comes across as rude or strongly toned. It's part of the Aspergers. Again, not an excuse, just something I am actively working on and something I continue to work on (which seems I need to try harder in this case). So, I apologize for the strongly-worded originial post, that was not my intention and I was not intended you call you or Armbrust a liar, but that the tag was
a lieincorrect. It obviously came across not as I intended and again, I apologize. As for the file (regardless the name), it just goes on the ol' watchlist pile, probably never to be seen again. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 17:52, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- I will accept your apology and give one of my own. Not that I am putting any excuses forth, but I have Aspergers (a form of Autism) and what to me sounds perfectly normal, comes across as rude or strongly toned. It's part of the Aspergers. Again, not an excuse, just something I am actively working on and something I continue to work on (which seems I need to try harder in this case). So, I apologize for the strongly-worded originial post, that was not my intention and I was not intended you call you or Armbrust a liar, but that the tag was
Neutron Moderator
What are you doing on this side ? Be used normally as BeO melting point 2507° german W. 2575° also usable for pebble bed aboput same moderation as graphite 100% not burning because oxidized not 11BN Just deleting is no contribution ! Spreading information about 11BN, BeO, He or graphite burning ? Also new suggested CH4 dangerous compared to He changing to 14CT4 radioactive & explosive genial ! Also Li works but melting early and pressurized N2/O2 with 14N compared to 12C also not absorbing ! N2 less diffusion problem than H2/He. Also unlikely considerd for construction with steaming UO2 in melting case modereted by air arround just adding some absorber materials arround enough for Zero Risk. UO2 condensing and flatend arround out. Normally going out through wished break point core. Why this should stand in talk first ? Also ESCOM PBMR can restart with 11BN after stopped myself ! Russian translation made for 11BN High pressure He cheap 1A heavy absorber going in corium Mo2B5 ? Stoppsandsystem before ? SiO2+HfC+HfB2+Mo,MoB5,B4C,10BN,Ti,TiB2 with sandgun or helicopter until out ! HfC heavier UO2 not used B4C swimming upon only ! Pb against gamma rays melting away just 2-3m sand gamma dense ! Russians did not know about available cheap Mo/Ti still 18-20s for stopp rods -50/60% instead <2s -90% like EPR/Advanced CANDU also injecting "Gadoliniumnitrat" into D2O. Fukushima tsunami wall by governement 3.12m build 5.7m 14m tsuanami opened door 10m high instead closed and snorkling generators >30m. THOR quake >10 tsunami >100m no danger from THOR stays closed and also opend no problem with 11BN also after A380 not burning no active cooling needed. FULL ZERO RISK but increasing deaths with just green energy on oil&gas&coal exploration and no money for expensive energy in winter time economy collapsing worldwide without +5TW up to 2050.
Can you write also arround more about that ? EPR side with hint for HfC Layer 3890° 1A absorber on critical point ramp&core catcher. If flatend out also but if ramp... melting ? ODIN Zero Risk.
Kay