Vanished user uih38riiw4hjlsd (talk | contribs) Notice: Bad AIV report. (TW) |
→RFA: note |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for making a report on [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]]. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and [[Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism|all users are encouraged]] to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in [[WP:VAND|vandalism]], or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately [[WP:WARN|warned]]. Please note there is a difference between [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] and unhelpful or misguided edits made in [[WP:AGF|good faith]]. If the user continues to vandalise after a ''recent'' final warning, please re-report it. Thank you!<!--Template:Uw-AIV--> [[User:Netalarm|<font color="#00AA11">'''Netalarm'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Netalarm|<font color="#FF9933">'''talk'''</font>]]</sup> 03:50, 14 August 2010 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thank you for making a report on [[Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism]]. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and [[Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism|all users are encouraged]] to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in [[WP:VAND|vandalism]], or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately [[WP:WARN|warned]]. Please note there is a difference between [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] and unhelpful or misguided edits made in [[WP:AGF|good faith]]. If the user continues to vandalise after a ''recent'' final warning, please re-report it. Thank you!<!--Template:Uw-AIV--> [[User:Netalarm|<font color="#00AA11">'''Netalarm'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Netalarm|<font color="#FF9933">'''talk'''</font>]]</sup> 03:50, 14 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Swillia9, |
|||
:The key point in the above is, '''Please take the issue to [[Talk:Christian perfection]] before editing the page again''' |
|||
:Please read [[Wikipedia:Editing_policy#Talking_and_editing]]. |
|||
:You reported another user for vandalism [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=378817022] and the edits were '''not''' vandalism. |
|||
:Vandalism is things such as, adding "LALALALALALALALALA". |
|||
:{{xt|Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism.}} |
|||
:Please read [[Wikipedia:Vandalism]]. |
|||
:[[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|Stay cool]], and [[Wikipedia:No angry mastodons|relax]]. Have a [[Wikipedia:A nice cup of tea and a sit down|cup of tea]] or something. Talk, and sort this out, in a civil way. |
|||
:If you continue to make changes without discussion, you are in danger of damaging your reputation on Wikipedia, and even being blocked. |
|||
:If you cannot come to an agreement, we can deal with that – we can get a [[WP:3O|third opinion]], make a [[WP:RFC|request for comments]], or get [[WP:MEDCAB|mediation]] – but all of this can be done in a nice, calm environment. |
|||
:I have seen similar incidents hundreds of times – and, at this point, it can go one of two ways. Please, let's sort this out, and work together, to make Wikipedia better. |
|||
:Thank you very much for your time in reading this.<small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">[[User:Chzz|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white"> Chzz </span>''']][[User talk:Chzz|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:yellow;"> ► </span>]]</span></small> 05:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:26, 14 August 2010
August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Christian perfection worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Techman224Talk 02:15, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Please stop adding Nazarene Church additions to Christian Perfection. I explained that this is a general page and need not have the discipline of denominations. You may be blocked from further edits if you continue. รัก-ไทย (talk) 19:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
RFA
I have undone your edit to WP:RFA, as you must follow the directions to nominate yourself for adminship. The instructions are Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nominate.
Now, let me get to brass tacks for a moment. Your RFA has zero chance of being successful. When I passed, I had been around for six months- low by some standards- and had made over 55,000 edits. The smallest edit count I've ever seen pass was around 2,500. Your edit count is under 50, and you've been actively around for two days. If you want to run, you may, but you should go into it with your eyes open, and browse through a couple of this year's failed RFAs. Let me know on ym talk page if I can be of assistance. Courcelles 03:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Christian perfection. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please take the issue to Talk:Christian perfection before editing the page again; gain consensus there before adding this material. Skier Dude (talk 03:39, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you! Netalarmtalk 03:50, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Swillia9,
- The key point in the above is, Please take the issue to Talk:Christian perfection before editing the page again
- Please read Wikipedia:Editing_policy#Talking_and_editing.
- You reported another user for vandalism [1] and the edits were not vandalism.
- Vandalism is things such as, adding "LALALALALALALALALA".
- Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism.
- Please read Wikipedia:Vandalism.
- Stay cool, and relax. Have a cup of tea or something. Talk, and sort this out, in a civil way.
- If you continue to make changes without discussion, you are in danger of damaging your reputation on Wikipedia, and even being blocked.
- If you cannot come to an agreement, we can deal with that – we can get a third opinion, make a request for comments, or get mediation – but all of this can be done in a nice, calm environment.
- I have seen similar incidents hundreds of times – and, at this point, it can go one of two ways. Please, let's sort this out, and work together, to make Wikipedia better.