→ANSWER: stop or you will be blocked |
Final warning: Formatting, date, language, etc (Manual of style). (TW) |
||
Line 330: | Line 330: | ||
* Your other edits are good, these are bad. (else I would have already asked you to be blocked, OK?) |
* Your other edits are good, these are bad. (else I would have already asked you to be blocked, OK?) |
||
If I see you sort another dab, I will ask you to be blocked. Repeat after you are unblocked, and I will ask to be blocked again. Eventually you will not be able to edit here. Please confirm you understand. If it helps, I speak German. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 10:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC) |
If I see you sort another dab, I will ask you to be blocked. Repeat after you are unblocked, and I will ask to be blocked again. Eventually you will not be able to edit here. Please confirm you understand. If it helps, I speak German. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 10:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
== October 2015 == |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]]. ''mass sorting dabs against [[WP:CONSENSUS]]. See [[WP:MOSDAB]]''<!-- Template:uw-mos4 --> <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 10:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:04, 16 October 2015
Welcome
|
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
![]() |
June 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Arles may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ] king.<ref>[http://www.ccel.org/w/wace/biodict/htm/iii.iii.iv.htm Wace, ''Dictionary''])</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ChamithN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sri Lanka, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 09:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Vrac. Your recent edit to the page Guadalajara appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vrac (talk) 20:39, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Merrimack River may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- com/Merrimac|title=Merrimac|accessdate=2011-03-21|publisher=1911encyclopedia.org}}</ref>) is a {{convert|117|mi|km|adj=mid|-long}} river<ref name=NHD>U.S. Geological Survey. National
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Redirect Barnstar | |
Your diligent work in the area of redirect categorization and improvement is duly recognized and greatly appreciated. You are truly one of the unsung heroes of Wikipedia, and we hope you continue to enjoy your improvement of this awesome encyclopedia! Compassionate727 (talk) 19:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC) |
July 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sigmaringen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |area_code = 07571, 07570 (Gutenstein), 07577 (Jungnau
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Leap year may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- A '''leap year''', '''intercalary''' or '''bissextile year''') is a year containing one additional day (or, in the case of [[lunisolar calendar]]s, a month) in
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Duchy of Athens may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- The '''Duchy of Athens''' ([[Greek]]: ''Δουκᾶτον Ἀθηνῶν'', [[Catalan]]: ''Ducat d'Atenes'' was one of the [[Crusader State]]s
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Eichenbühl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to CSU
- Heimbuchenthal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to FWG
- Lyubsha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Russian
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bad Bibra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to CDU
- Karben (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to CDU
- Wetterzeube (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to PDS
- Zeitz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to FDP
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Are you a person, or a bot?
Heya, your recent editing history - with just redirects - seems to indicate that this account may be a bot account. Are you a human? (If so, I'm amazed at how fast you're making these redirects!) Thanks, | Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 12:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, I'm a person. Best regards -- Sweepy (talk) 12:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Cottian Alps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to German
- Province of Sondrio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Italian
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Mauna Loa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hawaiian
- Peter Laird (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to North Adams
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to UIC may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * ''UIC'', {{lang-fr|Union Internationale des Chemins de fer}}), see [[[[International Union of Railways]]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:19, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Uppsala Astronomical Observatory may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- The '''Uppsala Astronomical Observatory''' ('''UAO'''), '''Astronomiska observatoriet i Uppsala''') is the oldest astronomical observatory in [[Sweden]]. It was founded in 1741, though there was a
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sound effect may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '''Sound effect(s)''' or '''audio effect(s)''') are artificially created or enhanced [[sound]]s, or sound processes used to emphasize artistic or
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lawsuit may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- laws still in effect today, such as the [[Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution]].}}) is "a vernacular term for a suit, action, or cause instituted or depending between two private
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sankt Georgen an der Gusen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lit. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to NLM CityHopper does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jetstreamer Talk 10:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Redirect Barnstar | |
Your diligent work in the area of redirect categorization and improvement is duly recognized and greatly appreciated. You are truly one of the unsung heroes of Wikipedia, and we hope you continue to enjoy your improvement of this awesome encyclopedia! (Microsoft Service Messanger.) Ben7cullimore (talk) 06:42, 20 August 2015 (UTC) |
WP:Edit warring over the extra "or" at the Sexual intercourse article. After we discussed that extra "or" (see User talk:Flyer22/Archive 19#Sexual intercourse), you went ahead and re-added it anyway. And very recently, you re-added it again. Stop it. Even a slow edit war is still an edit war. And repeatedly adding contested additions without discussion can be WP:Disruptive. You clearly are not willing to discuss this matter, which is why you are being disruptive in this regard. The aforementioned discussion isn't even a discussion; it's you briefly commenting on my talk page, me replying, and you ceasing to reply. If you want to contest that extra "or," then make that case here at your talk page or at the Sexual intercourse talk page. There is no need to reply at my talk page, especially since your talk page is on my WP:Watchlist. As I stated in my latest revert of you, I'm more annoyed by your edit warring than you removing that extra "or" at this point. It feels like you are trying to WP:Game the system with the a slow edit war. Flyer22 (talk) 04:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Flyer 22, I disagree, my edit is/was an edit-warring. So much "or" are written as my edit. Please look at my preferences, how much dates I've adapted and only a few of them became reverts. I do good work for en-WP and you can see it on this user-talk. Therefore your blame don't pertain...Regards -- Sweepy (talk) 07:35, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- No matter how much good work you are doing for Wikipedia, you are indeed WP:Edit warring in this case. This is because you keep restoring a contested edit without further discussion. See the links I listed above, which show that we already discussed this and that you keep reverting. There also appears to be a language barrier between us.
Sorting disambiguation pages
Hi! Please note that disambiguation pages should not be ordered alphabetically, but by relevance and/or importance of the linked article. Please see MOS:DABORDER "Within each group or section, entries should be ordered to best assist the reader in finding their intended article. Entries are typically ordered first by similarity to the ambiguous title [...]". When in doubt, I generally take the length of the linked article and its number of sources into account too. -- intgr [talk] 07:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello intgr, in all my alphabetical sortings, I observe the WP-rules. My take on finding the searching is faster with alphabetical than without sorting. Please can you tell me several examples, where I did'nt? Regards -- Sweepy (talk) 09:34, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Pennsylvanien listed at Redirects for discussion
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pennsylvanien. Since you had some involvement with the Pennsylvanien redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 20:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Gerne :-) --Edcolins (talk) 18:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Neustadt (Aisch)-Bad Windsheim may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '''Neustadt (Aisch)-Bad Windsheim''' ([[German language|German]]: '''Landkreis Neustadt an der Aisch-Bad Windsheim''', official '''
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Austrian schilling may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- The '''Schilling''' ([[German language|German: ''Österreichischer Schilling'']] was the [[currency]] of [[Austria]] from
- 7E2002_-_2nd_Republic_Schilling_Circulation/country/927-Austria colnect - catalogue by collectors > Coins > Austria (Österreich) > 1945~2002 - 2nd Republic (Schilling) Circulation (16), built 2003-2014]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Spiš may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Slovak]]); [[Latin]]: Cips/Zepus/Scepus, {{lang-de|Zips}}, {{lang-hu|Szepesség}}, {{lang-pl|Spisz}}) is a region in north-eastern [[Slovakia]], with a very small area in south-eastern [[Poland]] (14
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/WP_teahouse_logo_3.png/40px-WP_teahouse_logo_3.png)
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ashenai (talk) 18:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC). (You can at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/WP_teahouse_logo_3.png/40px-WP_teahouse_logo_3.png)
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ashenai (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC). (You can at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
October 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Mass a-b sorting dab pages is disruptive. More than one of us has pointed this out. Stop now, else this will end in a block. Please revert them and discuss. Widefox; talk 10:24, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 10:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I've mentioned this at the project, as it may need mass fixing, ping User:Intgr. Widefox; talk 10:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, please discuss (at project above) before you sort another dab. In fact, the general warning shown when editing dabs has been ignored, as well as the specific not to a-b sort dabs. Ignoring WP:consensus risks being instantly blocked. Before you edit another dab, you must familiarise yourself with WP:MOSDAB. Other editors are now spending time clearing this up, so suggest replying there. Widefox; talk 19:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of QBA (disambiguation)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on QBA (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
- disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Widefox; talk 21:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
ANSWER
Hello together, I'm very sure, my edits, alphabetical sortings and so on are correct. I wrote some users about their revertings. I will do it to all others reverters my correct edits. It's for me many work but I'll clear and explain it. Please give me time. I'm not a vandale! You can look at my 8,956 edits in your WP since april 2014! Not more than about 30 have been reverted...Why is my doing and helping in your WP now incorrect? When you are being of the opinion, I don't work correct, I've no problems when you will block me...Mentioned in passing you can look at my user page to see the awards from two other users. Best regards -- Sweepy (talk) 23:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- You also can look at my corrections in infoboxes from towns etc. at very, very old dates and my corrections to the new dates! Inhabitants, areas, codes, car Registrations, mayors, parties and so on! I'm very wondering about checking this fact...Regards -- Sweepy (talk) 23:43, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- As you say, you're not a new editor, so you shouldn't need pointing towards WP:consensus. At least 4 editors have undone these dab/hatnote edits. You ignored it at WP:MOSDAB, and when two editors explicitly pointed it out above and when these edits were undone. (plus the hatnote at QBA, dab QBA (disambiguation) and those are just the edits we've checked so far). If you've read MOSDAB, then you need to familiarise yourself better before you edit a dab again. Your reply above doesn't convince me you're going to not do this again. You're convinced you're right, wrong. See WP:IDHT. Widefox; talk 00:38, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- First I thank for your answer. I don't know all your notices to ruls, in english not all the more. I think I'm not alone...Therefore say me please, shall I continue my work or not? Please be so kind to answer directly. Than I finish immediately because you've much better editors and volunteers...Congratulations for this...-- Sweepy (talk) 00:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- As you say, you're not a new editor, so you shouldn't need pointing towards WP:consensus. At least 4 editors have undone these dab/hatnote edits. You ignored it at WP:MOSDAB, and when two editors explicitly pointed it out above and when these edits were undone. (plus the hatnote at QBA, dab QBA (disambiguation) and those are just the edits we've checked so far). If you've read MOSDAB, then you need to familiarise yourself better before you edit a dab again. Your reply above doesn't convince me you're going to not do this again. You're convinced you're right, wrong. See WP:IDHT. Widefox; talk 00:38, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- You also can look at my corrections in infoboxes from towns etc. at very, very old dates and my corrections to the new dates! Inhabitants, areas, codes, car Registrations, mayors, parties and so on! I'm very wondering about checking this fact...Regards -- Sweepy (talk) 23:43, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Why are you still indiscriminately sorting alphabetically after being asked not to? If you continue to do this then I will block you. —Xezbeth (talk) 07:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
You ask "shall I continue my work or not?" Yes, please continue to make helpful edits to the encyclopedia, but please stop your disruptive A-Z sorting edits to disambiguation pages such as this one. The reader is much better served by the previous, carefully-thought-out, sequence in the "Music" section whereby there are people, bands, albums, songs, grouped together. A-Z by article title serves best the reader who knows the exact title of the target article ... but that reader will not have come to the dab page. The reader who does not know just how Wikipedia has titled the article they are looking for is better served by a dab page with a structured list, such as this one. So please do not continue to sort dab pages A-Z: there is no justification in policy or guidelines and it does not help the reader. PamD 10:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- As English isn't your native language...to be clear:
- Do not sort another dab, agree?
- Your other edits are good, these are bad. (else I would have already asked you to be blocked, OK?)
If I see you sort another dab, I will ask you to be blocked. Repeat after you are unblocked, and I will ask to be blocked again. Eventually you will not be able to edit here. Please confirm you understand. If it helps, I speak German. Widefox; talk 10:02, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. mass sorting dabs against WP:CONSENSUS. See WP:MOSDAB Widefox; talk 10:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)