→Sorting disambiguation pages: new section |
|||
Line 245: | Line 245: | ||
[[WP:Edit warring]] over the extra "or" at the [[Sexual intercourse]] article. After we discussed that extra "or" (see [[User talk:Flyer22/Archive 19#Sexual intercourse]]), you went ahead and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexual_intercourse&diff=673858098&oldid=673844541 re-added it anyway]. And very recently, you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexual_intercourse&diff=678057455&oldid=677927068 re-added it again]. Stop it. Even a slow edit war is still an edit war. And repeatedly adding contested additions without discussion can be [[WP:Disruptive]]. You clearly are not willing to discuss this matter, which is why you are being disruptive in this regard. The aforementioned discussion isn't even a discussion; it's you briefly commenting on my talk page, me replying, and you ceasing to reply. If you want to contest that extra "or," then make that case here at your talk page or at the Sexual intercourse talk page. There is no need to reply at my talk page, especially since your talk page is on my [[WP:Watchlist]]. As I stated in my latest revert of you, I'm more annoyed by your edit warring than you removing that extra "or" at this point. It feels like you are trying to [[WP:Game the system]] with the a slow edit war. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 04:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC) |
[[WP:Edit warring]] over the extra "or" at the [[Sexual intercourse]] article. After we discussed that extra "or" (see [[User talk:Flyer22/Archive 19#Sexual intercourse]]), you went ahead and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexual_intercourse&diff=673858098&oldid=673844541 re-added it anyway]. And very recently, you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexual_intercourse&diff=678057455&oldid=677927068 re-added it again]. Stop it. Even a slow edit war is still an edit war. And repeatedly adding contested additions without discussion can be [[WP:Disruptive]]. You clearly are not willing to discuss this matter, which is why you are being disruptive in this regard. The aforementioned discussion isn't even a discussion; it's you briefly commenting on my talk page, me replying, and you ceasing to reply. If you want to contest that extra "or," then make that case here at your talk page or at the Sexual intercourse talk page. There is no need to reply at my talk page, especially since your talk page is on my [[WP:Watchlist]]. As I stated in my latest revert of you, I'm more annoyed by your edit warring than you removing that extra "or" at this point. It feels like you are trying to [[WP:Game the system]] with the a slow edit war. [[User:Flyer22|Flyer22]] ([[User talk:Flyer22|talk]]) 04:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
:Hello Flyer 22, I disagree, my edit is/was an edit-warring. So much "or" are written as my edit. Please look at my preferences, how much dates I've adapted and only a few of them became reverts. I do good work for en-WP and you can see it on this user-talk. Therefore your blame don't pertain...Regards -- [[User:Sweepy|Sweepy]] ([[User talk:Sweepy#top|talk]]) 07:35, 27 August 2015 (UTC) |
:Hello Flyer 22, I disagree, my edit is/was an edit-warring. So much "or" are written as my edit. Please look at my preferences, how much dates I've adapted and only a few of them became reverts. I do good work for en-WP and you can see it on this user-talk. Therefore your blame don't pertain...Regards -- [[User:Sweepy|Sweepy]] ([[User talk:Sweepy#top|talk]]) 07:35, 27 August 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Sorting disambiguation pages == |
|||
Hi! Please note that disambiguation pages should '''not''' be ordered alphabetically, but by relevance and/or importance of the linked article. Please see [[MOS:DABORDER]] "''Within each group or section, entries should be ordered to best assist the reader in finding their intended article. Entries are typically ordered first by similarity to the ambiguous title [...]''". When in doubt, I generally take the length of the linked article and its number of sources into account too. -- [[user:intgr|intgr]] <small>[[user talk:intgr|[talk]]]</small> 07:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:41, 27 August 2015
Welcome
|
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
![]() |
June 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Arles may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ] king.<ref>[http://www.ccel.org/w/wace/biodict/htm/iii.iii.iv.htm Wace, ''Dictionary''])</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ChamithN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sri Lanka, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 09:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Vrac. Your recent edit to the page Guadalajara appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vrac (talk) 20:39, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Merrimack River may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- com/Merrimac|title=Merrimac|accessdate=2011-03-21|publisher=1911encyclopedia.org}}</ref>) is a {{convert|117|mi|km|adj=mid|-long}} river<ref name=NHD>U.S. Geological Survey. National
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Redirect Barnstar | |
Your diligent work in the area of redirect categorization and improvement is duly recognized and greatly appreciated. You are truly one of the unsung heroes of Wikipedia, and we hope you continue to enjoy your improvement of this awesome encyclopedia! Compassionate727 (talk) 19:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC) |
July 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sigmaringen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |area_code = 07571, 07570 (Gutenstein), 07577 (Jungnau
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Leap year may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- A '''leap year''', '''intercalary''' or '''bissextile year''') is a year containing one additional day (or, in the case of [[lunisolar calendar]]s, a month) in
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Duchy of Athens may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- The '''Duchy of Athens''' ([[Greek]]: ''Δουκᾶτον Ἀθηνῶν'', [[Catalan]]: ''Ducat d'Atenes'' was one of the [[Crusader State]]s
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Eichenbühl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to CSU
- Heimbuchenthal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to FWG
- Lyubsha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Russian
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bad Bibra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to CDU
- Karben (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to CDU
- Wetterzeube (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to PDS
- Zeitz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to FDP
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Are you a person, or a bot?
Heya, your recent editing history - with just redirects - seems to indicate that this account may be a bot account. Are you a human? (If so, I'm amazed at how fast you're making these redirects!) Thanks, | Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 12:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, I'm a person. Best regards -- Sweepy (talk) 12:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Cottian Alps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to German
- Province of Sondrio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Italian
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Mauna Loa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hawaiian
- Peter Laird (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to North Adams
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to UIC may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * ''UIC'', {{lang-fr|Union Internationale des Chemins de fer}}), see [[[[International Union of Railways]]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:19, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Uppsala Astronomical Observatory may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- The '''Uppsala Astronomical Observatory''' ('''UAO'''), '''Astronomiska observatoriet i Uppsala''') is the oldest astronomical observatory in [[Sweden]]. It was founded in 1741, though there was a
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sound effect may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '''Sound effect(s)''' or '''audio effect(s)''') are artificially created or enhanced [[sound]]s, or sound processes used to emphasize artistic or
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sankt Georgen an der Gusen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lit. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to NLM CityHopper does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jetstreamer Talk 10:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Redirect Barnstar | |
Your diligent work in the area of redirect categorization and improvement is duly recognized and greatly appreciated. You are truly one of the unsung heroes of Wikipedia, and we hope you continue to enjoy your improvement of this awesome encyclopedia! (Microsoft Service Messanger.) Ben7cullimore (talk) 06:42, 20 August 2015 (UTC) |
WP:Edit warring over the extra "or" at the Sexual intercourse article. After we discussed that extra "or" (see User talk:Flyer22/Archive 19#Sexual intercourse), you went ahead and re-added it anyway. And very recently, you re-added it again. Stop it. Even a slow edit war is still an edit war. And repeatedly adding contested additions without discussion can be WP:Disruptive. You clearly are not willing to discuss this matter, which is why you are being disruptive in this regard. The aforementioned discussion isn't even a discussion; it's you briefly commenting on my talk page, me replying, and you ceasing to reply. If you want to contest that extra "or," then make that case here at your talk page or at the Sexual intercourse talk page. There is no need to reply at my talk page, especially since your talk page is on my WP:Watchlist. As I stated in my latest revert of you, I'm more annoyed by your edit warring than you removing that extra "or" at this point. It feels like you are trying to WP:Game the system with the a slow edit war. Flyer22 (talk) 04:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Flyer 22, I disagree, my edit is/was an edit-warring. So much "or" are written as my edit. Please look at my preferences, how much dates I've adapted and only a few of them became reverts. I do good work for en-WP and you can see it on this user-talk. Therefore your blame don't pertain...Regards -- Sweepy (talk) 07:35, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Sorting disambiguation pages
Hi! Please note that disambiguation pages should not be ordered alphabetically, but by relevance and/or importance of the linked article. Please see MOS:DABORDER "Within each group or section, entries should be ordered to best assist the reader in finding their intended article. Entries are typically ordered first by similarity to the ambiguous title [...]". When in doubt, I generally take the length of the linked article and its number of sources into account too. -- intgr [talk] 07:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)