rv sock of banned user Matt Sanchez/Bluemarine |
70.234.154.58 (talk) hello, question |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:I'm only watching the article inasmuch as I am also watching the OTRS tickets related to the article. It's also a hectic week for me, but yes, trust that the article does have eyes on it. Feel free to ask for help if you have any questions about the map. [[User:Swatjester|<font color="red">⇒</font>]][[User_talk:Swatjester|<font face="Euclid Fraktur"><font color="black">SWAT</font><font color="goldenrod">Jester</font></font>]] [[WP:CLIMBING|<small><sup>Son of the Defender</sup></small>]] 06:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
:I'm only watching the article inasmuch as I am also watching the OTRS tickets related to the article. It's also a hectic week for me, but yes, trust that the article does have eyes on it. Feel free to ask for help if you have any questions about the map. [[User:Swatjester|<font color="red">⇒</font>]][[User_talk:Swatjester|<font face="Euclid Fraktur"><font color="black">SWAT</font><font color="goldenrod">Jester</font></font>]] [[WP:CLIMBING|<small><sup>Son of the Defender</sup></small>]] 06:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Wondering== |
|||
Hello, I was wondering, why did you remove my edit to [[Lawyer]]? [[Special:Contributions/70.234.154.58|70.234.154.58]] ([[User talk:70.234.154.58|talk]]) 04:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:49, 28 February 2008
Φ
SPR
Thanks for the protect. This article always gets hit hard during school vacations.--Lepeu1999 (talk) 14:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Matt Sanchez picture
If the assertion of bad faith is warranted by relevant and strong evidence, I don't think it's an assumption. But I won't continue to revert - I don't have a strong opinion on the issue. Kalkin (talk) 02:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 02:57, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your efforts
Thank you for your edits in Supreme Court of the United States on the judicial usurpation/activism section. Glad to know it was not just me. Magidin (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. The fun part is seeing how far that extends in other sections. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 20:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Red Faction
There's an IP editing Red Faction that I can't figure out. First he blanks, and then he spams. He has now added onto the article stuff that I can't honestly delete and call it vandalism. Can you check it out? -WarthogDemon 02:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Sure. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 02:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's advertising, I've removed it and semiprotected.⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 02:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
More Sanchez
So there *are* other admins watching the article! Good. Please let me know if I a) overstep or b) understep - I feel like I might be getting too close sometimes, and I feel like I'm too new with the mop to know what and when to clean up. Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 06:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm only watching the article inasmuch as I am also watching the OTRS tickets related to the article. It's also a hectic week for me, but yes, trust that the article does have eyes on it. Feel free to ask for help if you have any questions about the map. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 06:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Wondering
Hello, I was wondering, why did you remove my edit to Lawyer? 70.234.154.58 (talk) 04:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)