Kapil.xerox (talk | contribs) →AN Report: new section |
Two discretionary sanctions alerts Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:AN-notice-->[[User:Kapil.xerox|Kapil.xerox]] ([[User talk:Kapil.xerox|talk]]) 05:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC) |
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:AN-notice-->[[User:Kapil.xerox|Kapil.xerox]] ([[User talk:Kapil.xerox|talk]]) 05:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
==Discretionary sanctions alert for India, Pakistan and Afghanistan== |
|||
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' |
|||
'''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]]. |
|||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 12:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC). |
|||
==Discretionary sanctions alert for biographies of living people== |
|||
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' |
|||
'''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. |
|||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 12:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC). |
Revision as of 12:35, 26 September 2015
Welcome
Welcome to my talk page. Please be respectful. Have had issues in the past and now I am unblocked. My expertise and general interest is with controversial topics within Hinduism. Swamiblue (talk) 04:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Akshardham
You undid 3 of my edits and termed it as vandalism. Do you know the exact meaning of vandalism or you are obliged not to explain the reason behind the reverts?
Reference errors on 11 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Akshardham (Delhi) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help) and an unsupported parameter error (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Vandalism
Please take the time to consider that Wikipedia policy does not consider content disputes, such as at Akshardham (Delhi), to be WP:VANDALISM; and that unwarranted accusations of vandalism in edit summaries constitute personal attacks, and must be avoided. You've been doing this often, for quite a while, and it really must stop; the next time you refer to a good faith editor as a vandal, you'll likely find yourself blocked. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for clearing that up. Some times I quickly revert content removal without valid reason and call it vandalism because of the nature of the topic but I will make sure that I am more aware. I would like to have your input on the disputed content if you have time. Thanks User:Jpgordon, Swamiblue (talk) 01:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC); edited to clarify author Dr Crazy 102 (talk) 07:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Your RfC on Talk:Akshardham_(Delhi)
Welcome Back to Wiki Swamiblue! You may want to check out WP:Request for comment on how to properly file an RfC, as well as instructions on creating a proper RfC that sends out a message to multiple editors who may not be involved on the article to put in their two cents on the question asked. I am posting this since you do not seem to have put in the Template:Rfc which would inform other editors and open a proper RfC. Dr Crazy 102 (talk)
Reference errors on 19 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Akshardham (Delhi) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swaminarayan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sentimentalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Blocked for personal attacks
I've warned you previously about this; you're now blocked for 48 hours, and it will escalate rapidly should you do it again. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- I said misguided because I wasn't sure if the user even read the mountain of discussion on the talk page. There has been several new users that have been reverting that particular topic and it has been vandalism so I don't think that it was necessary to block me. What is it when someone just deletes everything without reason? Swamiblue (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- It's called a content dispute, and your repeated accusations of vandalism are the actual problem here. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:36, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- I need to stop calling content dispute vandalism. Got it. I will take the next few days off and re read some polices. I think stating something like "Restoring mass deletion of sourced material, I don't see a consensus on the talk page to remove this" would have been more appropriate. The other user is state copyright issues but I am not clear if when we are suppose to use direct sentences. I find myself conflicted because when I write another way, someone tells me that the no where in the source does it say that because I summarized. Thanks for your reply.Swamiblue (talk) 19:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- It's called a content dispute, and your repeated accusations of vandalism are the actual problem here. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:36, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- I said misguided because I wasn't sure if the user even read the mountain of discussion on the talk page. There has been several new users that have been reverting that particular topic and it has been vandalism so I don't think that it was necessary to block me. What is it when someone just deletes everything without reason? Swamiblue (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Re: Akshardham_Environmental_Violation
Message added Drcrazy102 (talk) 00:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ANI Report
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kapil.xerox (talk) 05:10, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
AN Report
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Kapil.xerox (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert for India, Pakistan and Afghanistan
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 Bishonen | talk 12:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC).
Discretionary sanctions alert for biographies of living people
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 Bishonen | talk 12:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC).