→Removals: irrelevant |
Please stop using revert as a weapon |
||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
Svetovid, I noticed that you've been removing some Hungarian names, and using edit summaries of "Unsourced for 50 days". A better way to handle this, would be to add a {{tl|cn}} (citation needed) tag to whatever you intend to remove. Then, if no source is provided within a week, go ahead and remove the information. But per [[WP:V]], it's better to at least give fair warning that you are intending to remove something. Thanks, [[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 15:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC) |
Svetovid, I noticed that you've been removing some Hungarian names, and using edit summaries of "Unsourced for 50 days". A better way to handle this, would be to add a {{tl|cn}} (citation needed) tag to whatever you intend to remove. Then, if no source is provided within a week, go ahead and remove the information. But per [[WP:V]], it's better to at least give fair warning that you are intending to remove something. Thanks, [[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 15:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
:OK. But editors need to keep in mind that they need to source that the names are real AND that they are relevant.--[[User:Svetovid|Svetovid]] ([[User talk:Svetovid#top|talk]]) 18:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC) |
:OK. But editors need to keep in mind that they need to source that the names are real AND that they are relevant.--[[User:Svetovid|Svetovid]] ([[User talk:Svetovid#top|talk]]) 18:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Reverts== |
|||
Svetovid, please stop using "revert" as a tool in a content dispute. I've been trying to give you a lot of leeway here, but if you revert another good faith edit, or speak with incivility, I will re-impose sanctions and/or block account access again. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 19:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:12, 29 June 2008
“ | The problem is that the people with the most ridiculous ideas are always the people who are most certain of them..........................................Bill Maher | ” |
“ | Wikipedia is too often like the wild west, where the ability to shout the loudest, swing the hardest, and outlast the other fellow counts more than the quality and depth of one's sources..........................................Raymond Arritt | ” |
Welcome!
|
Nice work. Tankred 03:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for that Svetovid. This article was kindly nominated by Bbik. In the future feel free to self-nom like the majority of our entries. It certainly is ok, and we definitely could do with Slovakian stuff on DYK more often. I actually went to Bratislava for a day....back in ol 2001. See you around, Blnguyen (cranky admin anniversary) 02:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Merger proposed
I'm proposing a merger on an article you worked on. Since the shelf clouds and roll clouds are subset of the arcus clouds, they should be integrated into the later article. This would make a more complete article instead of splitting the information among three articles. Anwer in Talk:arcus cloud.
Pierre cb (talk) 04:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Behavior
Svetovid, why the recent incivility? You had been doing so well, and I was looking forward to lifting your revert restrictions. But now you're back to incivility, personal attacks, and even a revert at Hedvig Malina. Please stop. If you continue, I will have to block your account access again. --Elonka 06:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- I rest my case about political correctness overcoming the real issues. I reverted vandalism that compromised the whole article. You should be wondering why nobody else reverted that in 20 days even though they were eager to revert other changes in minutes.
If you really want to keep talking about the Malinová article, I'd like to remind you of: "This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous."--Svetovid (talk) 08:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
®µ§¥£—
Hi paradigmatic boy... > —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.230.238.106 (talk) 07:45, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Slovak-Hungarian naming convention
Hi Svetovid, could you explain me what exactly are your concerns about the naming convention that was constructed at User talk:Elonka/Hungarian-Slovakian experiment? I think it's all about WP:NCGN, which leaves quite some room for different interpretations. Some people apparently think that all Slovak names were invented in 1918, and other people think that Hungarian names should be removed from every article about places in Slovakia. Markussep Talk 21:23, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Removals
Svetovid, I noticed that you've been removing some Hungarian names, and using edit summaries of "Unsourced for 50 days". A better way to handle this, would be to add a {{cn}} (citation needed) tag to whatever you intend to remove. Then, if no source is provided within a week, go ahead and remove the information. But per WP:V, it's better to at least give fair warning that you are intending to remove something. Thanks, Elonka 15:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- OK. But editors need to keep in mind that they need to source that the names are real AND that they are relevant.--Svetovid (talk) 18:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Reverts
Svetovid, please stop using "revert" as a tool in a content dispute. I've been trying to give you a lot of leeway here, but if you revert another good faith edit, or speak with incivility, I will re-impose sanctions and/or block account access again. --Elonka 19:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)