Supreme Deliciousness (talk | contribs) |
HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs) →Moving forward: new section |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
I'm not formally logging this, because I'm not imposing this under any sort of discretionary sanction. I'm simply informing you that per your recent edits, if you speak to or refer to JJG outside of the context of a currently outstanding AE request, you will be blocked. The reason for this should be quite clear. If you want to appeal this, please take it straight to AN/ANI and leave me a note on my talk page if you wish. '''<font color="navy">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 05:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC) |
I'm not formally logging this, because I'm not imposing this under any sort of discretionary sanction. I'm simply informing you that per your recent edits, if you speak to or refer to JJG outside of the context of a currently outstanding AE request, you will be blocked. The reason for this should be quite clear. If you want to appeal this, please take it straight to AN/ANI and leave me a note on my talk page if you wish. '''<font color="navy">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 05:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Moving forward == |
|||
JJG has been topic-banned and the consensus seems to be that there is no solid basis for any formal sanction against yourself, so I'm about to close the current AE request against you. You should consider this something like a "last chance"{{mdash}}I don't want to sanction you or anybody else, I'm sure we all have better things to do. I would caution you, though, that if a third party files an AE request against you, with genuine evidence of disruption that postdates this message, you'll be facing a lengthy topic ban. To put it concisely: please make a genuine effort to keep your nose clean and take this opportunity to prove that you can be genuinely beneficial (not just non-detrimental) to the topic area. You can consider this an amnesty on anything you haven't been sanctioned for up to now. Best, [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ Mitchell'''</font>]] | [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]] 21:16, 5 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:16, 5 March 2011
Topic ban lifted
I've lifted your topic ban and amended WP:ARBPIA to reflect this. In lieu of the remaining month on your topic ban consider this a caution to edit within the letter and the spirit of ARBPIA and all applicable policies and guidelines. Consider it a chance to prove that the topic ban was unnecessary. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Unfortunately premature it looks like. Notified Cptnono (talk) 20:55, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- SD, I apologise for not keeping a grip on my temper earlier. For future reference, I don't have an issue with you filing AE requests, I just would have appreciated it if you had levelled with me and told me that's what you were planning when we were discussing your topic ban and I think you can understand how you might have come across as disingenuous, even if that's not how you meant it. In future, if you want my help, then level with me. I think you'll find me a reasonable person, but it helps if you're reasonable with me. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Jerusalem
Hi. Funny actually as I was considering making one of Jerusalem but that was the very reason I didn't because of politics. and might cause disputes. I can create one without boundaries and of specific areas of Jerusalem but as I am unaware of where the political boundaries are I can't really do that.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Servers are bad at the moment but I've made one of Old Jerusalem at Template:Location map Old Jerusalem. If they're better tomorrow I'll do one of the whole city.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:11, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
See Jaffa Gate. PLease add it to other articles and add more details in the infoboxes.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:15, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Not sure whether you are Israel or Palestine but I made one for Gaza. See Al Deira Hotel.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Oh don't worry I will make one of the whole of Jerusalem. The server wouldn't let me this evening but allowed the Gaza one. I'll try again tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Done. No idea why the server works at times and others it doesn't.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, google maps are copyrighted, that's the best I can do.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:58, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
The maps though are supposed to show an outline of where in the city is, ignore the Hebrew text..♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
I'll make one of Eastern Jerusalem (northeastern).♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
See Cave of the Ramban. I tried to block out as much Hebrew text as possible. Should be OK for a few landmarks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
In my experience drawing borders on maps ignites edit wars and bickering with disagreements over where the boundaries are. At the end of the day land is land and people are people.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
You have a Paint or photoshop programme on your PC? Feel free to draw a line yourself. I have no idea about politics and am not a position to know where the division is.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
JJG
This conversation is now closed. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
What he does elsewhere on the Internet is his business and, given how touchy you are about disclosure of your previous username, I would be very careful not to do anything that might be construed as "outing" by others if I were in your position. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Are you daft? You linked an article which someone published under his real life name with his wikipedia id, which is nowhere in that article. This is textbook outing. The shocking thing is that people are wasting time debating if you should be topic banned when behaviour like this should lead to complete ban from wikipedia. Rym torch (talk) 00:32, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
If you do not understand outing by now then you never will. Much like your abuse of multiple accounts. Don't argue with me when you know what the answer is. Other people have responded so keeping it up does nothing but waste server space and people's times. It was not your place to link the editor with the real life person. Multiple editors have tried to say this and you still do not get it. That is why you should banned and I look forward to laughing when it eventually happens. You came so close to being a decent editor with the whole patience during the settlement thing but I now realize you were just biding your time until it as advantageousness to make your point. Good luck on Wikipedia. I hope you get banned again and come back with a beter understanding but if not... well that is just as ell considering your current attitude. Cptnono (talk) 10:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC) |
Notification
I'm not formally logging this, because I'm not imposing this under any sort of discretionary sanction. I'm simply informing you that per your recent edits, if you speak to or refer to JJG outside of the context of a currently outstanding AE request, you will be blocked. The reason for this should be quite clear. If you want to appeal this, please take it straight to AN/ANI and leave me a note on my talk page if you wish. NW (Talk) 05:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Moving forward
JJG has been topic-banned and the consensus seems to be that there is no solid basis for any formal sanction against yourself, so I'm about to close the current AE request against you. You should consider this something like a "last chance"—I don't want to sanction you or anybody else, I'm sure we all have better things to do. I would caution you, though, that if a third party files an AE request against you, with genuine evidence of disruption that postdates this message, you'll be facing a lengthy topic ban. To put it concisely: please make a genuine effort to keep your nose clean and take this opportunity to prove that you can be genuinely beneficial (not just non-detrimental) to the topic area. You can consider this an amnesty on anything you haven't been sanctioned for up to now. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:16, 5 March 2011 (UTC)