→AfD trouble: new section Tag: New topic |
Superastig (talk | contribs) →AfD trouble: Reply Tag: Reply |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
Tough luck bud. I'm kinda disappointed with the outcomes of those 2 DRVs. What you received was a double kill, make that triple kill because someone reported you to the AN. [[User:SBKSPP|SBKSPP]] ([[User talk:SBKSPP|talk]]) 23:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
Tough luck bud. I'm kinda disappointed with the outcomes of those 2 DRVs. What you received was a double kill, make that triple kill because someone reported you to the AN. [[User:SBKSPP|SBKSPP]] ([[User talk:SBKSPP|talk]]) 23:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
:So am I. Since the time I was scolded months ago in [[User talk:Superastig/Archive 5#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KOAD-LP|a previous discussion]], I've been careful in picking which discussion to close and, believe me or not, those closures are really well-thought. Yet, a lot of editors seem to get triggered with some of my closures. Of almost 300 closures I've done for the past year, less than 10 of them were either overturned or relisted. I can't even believe an editor is making a big deal out of such. It's outright ridiculous. As for [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badnaseeb (2nd nomination)|Badnaseeb]], had anyone identified the sockpuppet IPs in the first place, then I wouldn't have touched the discussion at all. <span style="font-family: Century Gothic">[[User:Superastig|<span style="color: darkgoldenrod;">ASTIG</span>]][[User talk:Superastig|😎]][[Special:Contributions/Superastig|🙃]]</span> 18:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:09, 10 February 2023
- Welcome to my talk page. Take note of these rules before posting a comment.
- If you're here to throw hissy fits over any of my edits, get out. Ain't nobody got time for arguing with anyone.
- I have the right to end and delete any conversation which turn into arguments and are not worth continuing.
- If you're here to report disruptive edits from IP users and the pages involved, take them to the WP:AIV and WP:RFPP where they're better taken care of. I'm not an admin.
- I welcome good conversations, but I don't tolerate arguments. I don't wanna end up like a mastodon.
- Always sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Hi. There was no consensus to merge. The policy based responses were to delete. Please reconsider and revert your close. Onel5969 TT me 15:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I cannot. Two editors voted to "merge" its content to the respective target because they believed that it's not notable enough to warrant a standalone article and therefore is a valid WP:ATD. Therefore, I don't see a reason for me to revert my closure. ASTIG️🎉 (HAPPY 2023) 16:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Deletion review for 21 High Street Doha
An editor has asked for a deletion review of 21 High Street Doha. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Onel5969 TT me 19:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Reconsidering the close for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badnaseeb (2nd nomination)
Hey, I think you made the wrong call in closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badnaseeb (2nd nomination) given that keep !voters were never able to substantiate an actual case for how notability guidelines were met (as well as the prevalence of SPA IPs on the keep side). I'd ask you to reconsider your decision to NAC the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 15:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I cannot. I know that the "keep" votes are weak, but they still have merit whatsoever. And I don't see enough consensus for it to be deleted or redirected either. Therefore, I don't see a reason for me to revert my closure. ASTIG️🎉 (HAPPY 2023) 01:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Deletion review for Badnaseeb
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Badnaseeb. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. signed, Rosguill talk 02:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy Fourteenth First Edit Day!
Hey, Superastig. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2023 (UTC) |
Hi, I've undone your close of this AfD. For the rationale, see the relist comment. The BLP1E argument came late in the discussion, but merits to be addressed. --Randykitty (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Superastig non-admin AfD closes. Thank you. To be clear, I have proposed to topic ban you from closing AfDs. Flatscan (talk) 05:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
AfD trouble
Tough luck bud. I'm kinda disappointed with the outcomes of those 2 DRVs. What you received was a double kill, make that triple kill because someone reported you to the AN. SBKSPP (talk) 23:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- So am I. Since the time I was scolded months ago in a previous discussion, I've been careful in picking which discussion to close and, believe me or not, those closures are really well-thought. Yet, a lot of editors seem to get triggered with some of my closures. Of almost 300 closures I've done for the past year, less than 10 of them were either overturned or relisted. I can't even believe an editor is making a big deal out of such. It's outright ridiculous. As for Badnaseeb, had anyone identified the sockpuppet IPs in the first place, then I wouldn't have touched the discussion at all. ASTIG😎🙃 18:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)