Stalwart111 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 279: | Line 279: | ||
== outing == |
== outing == |
||
If you believe outing is occurring it's counterproductive to have the issue end up at ANI. First please use [[Wikipedia:Requests for oversight]] to have the content removed, and ''then'' consider raising the issue of the posting editor's behavior. While I'm sure you were acting in good faith with MarioNovi, an unnecessarily confrontational tone (e.g. "amoral") is more likely to put an editor and the defensive and cause them to "dig in," and create a bigger issue, than a more educational informative approach. <small>[[User talk:NE Ent|NE Ent]]</small> 13:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC) |
If you believe outing is occurring it's counterproductive to have the issue end up at ANI. First please use [[Wikipedia:Requests for oversight]] to have the content removed, and ''then'' consider raising the issue of the posting editor's behavior. While I'm sure you were acting in good faith with MarioNovi, an unnecessarily confrontational tone (e.g. "amoral") is more likely to put an editor and the defensive and cause them to "dig in," and create a bigger issue, than a more educational informative approach. <small>[[User talk:NE Ent|NE Ent]]</small> 13:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
<!--I've requested oversight in this matter and removed the offending content from three pages: The Better Badges AfD, MarioNovi's talk page, and the COIN. If there are any other instances that you know of or that occur in the near future, please remove them and inform oversight. My responses on each of the three pages were intended as red herrings, to avoid drawing attention to the edits. If you have any questions or comments, it would be best if you took them to my talk page. Thank you. ~~~~ --> |
Revision as of 01:45, 17 January 2013
This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 8 sections are present. |
16 May 2024 |
Welcome!
Please feel free to leave a note if you need to get in touch with me.
Nice things from other people.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A barnstar for you!
A "Barnstar" for your efforts!
A barnstar for you!
A barnstar for you!
New DVS Shoes articleA barnstar for you!
|
Merry Christmas!!
For all you do!! Have a wonderful HOLIDAY!!
2013
File:Happy New Year 2013.jpg | Have an enjoyable New Year! | |
Hello Stalwart111: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000(talk) 15:42, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
Re:
I'll do! Since these stuffs are definitely not notable my suggestion is to remove both the page and the RfD. The subject says his own trademak MUST be on the freedboard page, IANAL, but I don't see any legal background for the request. I'll forward his requests to the ANI and I'll hopefully step out of this boring case of spam+legal threats. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oh I already considered you though I didn't know so much about the duties of opening an ANI thread over there :D
- Now I was about to notify SQGibbon but I saw you already has beaten me in time!
- --Vituzzu (talk) 14:37, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I need your help.
Hi, I have just read your profile. I am impressed. Can you please help me in my article Rebecca Masterton please. Regards, -- Lubna Rizvi 15:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
SPI, ANI, and stuff
Hey there, thanks for dealing with all this Gravitis crap and keeping me up-to-date on it all. I've been super busy IRL and haven't been able to spend any time on WP stuff. Good luck on things and hopefully those people won't get you down. Thanks. SQGibbon (talk) 01:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Deletion and external hosting.
Rather than continuing to hi-jack the AfD, I'll come here. In the AN discussion, Coren finished by saying this. I'll wait until the end of the month and ask him if I don't see anything happening. Happy New Year! Thincat (talk) 13:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ha! I posted my response there before the notice of your note popped up. All good! I find myself in furious agreement with you - on deletion (mostly), on Coren's suggestion and on leaving that AFD to do its thing. As I said there - let me know if the suggestion is progressed. We will soon have our test cases! Stalwart111 14:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
DYK for David González (skateboarder)
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Deletion notice errors
Hi, thanks for your attention to matters of deletion. It's a lengthy bit of time since I was involved in an AfD, until now. In the case of these recent two, maybe could you take a look at the notices on my talk page. You'll notice that on both the discussion links are wrong, due to extraneous characters. I suspect this is because of some copy and paste stumble by the nominator, but I had thought if an article one had created got an AfD one got a proper notice automatically? Wwwhatsup (talk) 14:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC).
- Incidentally, in an extremely rare occurrence, and particularly as I have not edited much of late, I find myself involved in an edit war over at Richard Manitoba. A coincidence? Wwwhatsup (talk) 13:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for that further correction. You will see that on the companion AFD, the result has been no consensus with a strong recommendation to convert to article about MacFie, which I am reluctantly embracing. As to the nominator I am tending more to WP:AGF now as a further look at the contribs does indicate more newbie stumbling, even if it is single-minded. One observes limited comprehension of SPA to the level of using it to leverage another AfD, also possibly driven by the need to avoid that designation personally :) We shall see. Wwwhatsup (talk) 21:52, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your offer. Much appreciated. As far as MarioNovi goes, single-minded appears an understatement :)
Environmental impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill
Hi, Stalwart111. You participated at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of endangered species threatened by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill discussion. The result of that discussion was to merge the List of endangered species threatened by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill into Environmental impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The list was merged. However, there is a related discussion if the Environmental impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill was split correctly from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and if it should be merged back there. Relevant sections for this discussion are this and this. Your comments are appreciated. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Fortification
--S. Rich (talk) 22:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for being the first person to send me a welcome on wikipedia. Rebecski (talk) 13:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk Back
Message added 15:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— Yash [talk] 15:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
ANI
Hello, can you please do the ANI thing? Thank you, MarioNovi (talk) 09:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tag removal, and, again, for your general, dare I say, stalwart interventions. While the SPA factor was suspicious, as the scenario developed, as I said earlier, I came to believe MarioNova was indeed acting in good faith, if perhaps a little misguided. He/she still doesn't really appear to understand that those suspicions were also in good faith, and not an "attack" as such. However he/she does seem ready to learn from mistakes, so hope is alive. Probably early days of a great wikipedian, just practicing their deletionist skills on what appeared to them to be an open and shut case. Wwwhatsup (talk) 06:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
outing
If you believe outing is occurring it's counterproductive to have the issue end up at ANI. First please use Wikipedia:Requests for oversight to have the content removed, and then consider raising the issue of the posting editor's behavior. While I'm sure you were acting in good faith with MarioNovi, an unnecessarily confrontational tone (e.g. "amoral") is more likely to put an editor and the defensive and cause them to "dig in," and create a bigger issue, than a more educational informative approach. NE Ent 13:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)