108.205.228.188 (talk) →Pinto:: new section |
108.205.228.188 (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
{{U|NickCT}}, not sure if you got the email I sent you. I am debating filing a ARE against Hugh. See the copy below. Please don't reply here from your account because I'm sure Hugh will be tracking our comments and then trying to claim canvasing or the like.
subst:Sanction enforcement request header|Hugh
<!-- Supply diffs as evidence here, and explain why they require arbitration enforcement. Any allegation not supported by a diff is usually disregarded. You may also link to an archived version of long discussions instead of supplying very many diffs. -->
Editor banned from edits related to conservative politics post 2009 [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HughD&diff=694747797&oldid=694376942] and the political activities of the Koch family in particular [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HughD&diff=678240669&oldid=678239153] (" I am imposing a one-year topic ban on you from all articles related to the Tea Party movement broadly, including but not limited to anything at all related to Americans for Prosperity, Koch Industries, the Koch brothers.").
The [[Fraser Institute]] is described as a conservative think tank in the article lead. The editor has previously added Koch related content to the article (example [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fraser_Institute&diff=652101390&oldid=652100790]) which makes the general article a violation of "broadly". The violating edit was related to a 2014 article about the institute which would violate the 2009 and later conservative topic's portion of the ban.
; Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any :
<!-- To the extent it may be relevant, link to previous sanctions such as blocks or topic bans.-->
Previous issues with topic ban violations.
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/
#[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive187#HughD Jan 7, 2016] 1 week block for violation. Appeal of block was rejected [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive188#Statement_by_HughD]
;If [[Wikipedia:AC/DS|discretionary sanctions]] are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see [[
<!-- The following are examples. Write "Not applicable" or similar if this is not a discretionary sanctions enforcement request. Otherwise, fill out at least one line that applies and delete the rest. If you wish to request discretionary sanctions but none of these situations apply, issue an alert yourself instead of making this request, see the link above. -->
*Previously given a discretionary sanction for conduct in the area of conflict on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HughD&diff=678240669&oldid=678239153 Date] by admin|Ricky81682.
*Alerted about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, see the system log linked to above.
*Gave an alert about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on [http://Difflink1 Date]
*Participated in an arbitration request or enforcement procedure about the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on [http://Difflink1 Date].
*Successfully appealed all their own sanctions relating to the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on [http://Difflink1 Aug 28, 2015].
|
Revision as of 19:57, 11 April 2016
NickCT, not sure if you got the email I sent you. I am debating filing a ARE against Hugh. See the copy below. Please don't reply here from your account because I'm sure Hugh will be tracking our comments and then trying to claim canvasing or the like.
subst:Sanction enforcement request header|Hugh
- [[1]] of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation how these edits violate it
Editor banned from edits related to conservative politics post 2009 [2] and the political activities of the Koch family in particular [3] (" I am imposing a one-year topic ban on you from all articles related to the Tea Party movement broadly, including but not limited to anything at all related to Americans for Prosperity, Koch Industries, the Koch brothers.").
The Fraser Institute is described as a conservative think tank in the article lead. The editor has previously added Koch related content to the article (example [4]) which makes the general article a violation of "broadly". The violating edit was related to a 2014 article about the institute which would violate the 2009 and later conservative topic's portion of the ban.
- Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any
Previous issues with topic ban violations.
- Oct 11, 15 Violation of topic ban resulting in warning.
- Oct 29, 15 1 week block for violation of ban. Appeal of block was rejected [5]
- Jan 7, 2016 1 week block for violation. Appeal of block was rejected [6]
- If discretionary sanctions are requested, supply evidence that the user is aware of them (see [[7]])
- Previously given a discretionary sanction for conduct in the area of conflict on Date by admin|Ricky81682.
- Alerted about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, see the system log linked to above.
- Gave an alert about discretionary sanctions in the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on Date
- Participated in an arbitration request or enforcement procedure about the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on Date.
- Successfully appealed all their own sanctions relating to the area of conflict in the last twelve months, on Aug 28, 2015.