Catalogue → Opus in infoboxes
Hello, Solidest ~ Per our chat yesterday, I have gone back to my various work on Jean Sibelius, Leevi Madetoja, Uuno Klami, Ernst Mielck, Lars-Erik Larsson, and Dag Wirén to convert the inboxes accordingly. There are several Sibelius opus-numbered compositions pages that still lack an infobox, although if/when I even get to them, I will add inboxes accordingly. From your perspective, are inboxes generally useful on composition articles? If so, I can make it a point to add them sooner rather than later (i.e., not waiting until I undertake expansions of the articles). Warmly, ~ Silence of Järvenpää 19:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. Thanks for the edits. I was going to do this myself a bit later as we discussed yesterday, but I'm glad you got ahead of me. Yes, I think infoboxes are always useful in such articles. I know that some users take (or have taken) the opposite approach regarding classical compositions, and this optionality seems to be even written into the guidelines as far as I remember, but I don't really get the point of it. The infobox is actually a brief summary of the subject of the article, and can always be filled in, and it will always be useful to the reader. Solidest (talk) 20:55, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Article:Afro Tech , contributions and edits
1. They are clearly two seperate words, and how the subgenres name is predominantly displayed as well as typed across a plethora of sources and platforms, not a stylization. (Your move also only suspiciously, took place after the pages views were increasing. After your move ,it's back to near 0). Again ,seems malicious and unecessary, not even by accident or genuinely wanting to improve.Thus, if the bots or more established admins haven't found a problem, I think you should disregard it. 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Fusion_music_genres ; "This category contains music genres that could be considered fusions of various historical genres; that is, they combine elements of different genres together." As per numerous sources and evidence , this is or will definitely be the case , in future, if not so, already. 3 None of the sources , source nothing , if you have time to read properly ,they all mention or highlight the topic/ article. Thank you. ToosieJoosie (talk) 19:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- I have actually just found that you are the last and only editor on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro_Tech page's contributions that created a duplicate , citation, instead of re-using, which I have to rescue and fix, now. I don't know what your problem is but please stop with the fixation and malisciousness. ToosieJoosie (talk) 20:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)